The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on
WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and
WP:CONTEXT.[?]
If there is not a
free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
There are a few occurrences of
weasel words in this article- please observe
WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
is considered
might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
As done in
WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the
CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
Ydone Turn an external jump I see into proper citation.
Ydone "He has represented his country at every level, and is considered a tremendous athlete." "Tremendous athlete"?!
POV.
Ydone Make your citing more consistent.
In general, all the articles you have submitted need further expansion, in order to become more comprehensive; otherwise, a peer-review cannot be very useful.--
Yannismarou11:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)reply
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on
WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and
WP:CONTEXT.[?]
If there is not a
free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
There are a few occurrences of
weasel words in this article- please observe
WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
is considered
might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
As done in
WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the
CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
Ydone Turn an external jump I see into proper citation.
Ydone "He has represented his country at every level, and is considered a tremendous athlete." "Tremendous athlete"?!
POV.
Ydone Make your citing more consistent.
In general, all the articles you have submitted need further expansion, in order to become more comprehensive; otherwise, a peer-review cannot be very useful.--
Yannismarou11:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)reply