I edited this article to better conform to Wikipedia standards and would like some other editors to take a look at it to make sure I'm not missing anything obvious. Also, I really don't know about the section titles in the article. They don't sound very good to me, but I couldn't think of a better way to divide them at the time. The names and section-break placement are open for discussion.
I'd like to get this article up to GA standards if we can. —
OranL (
talk)
08:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Too short to be judged. The citation-tags need fixing, the article should be expanded to go further the stub status, and the last stubby section is a "Personal Life" or "Family" section; note what its heading declares.-- Yannismarou ( talk) 19:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated with the aid of a semi-automatic javascript program.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The lead should have an appropriate number of paragraphs, and should adequately summarize the article. [?]
- This article has few images. Please see if there are any further free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non- fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload. [?]
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006. [?]
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as it could be. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]
- Very short sections should ideally be either expanded or merged.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 14:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I edited this article to better conform to Wikipedia standards and would like some other editors to take a look at it to make sure I'm not missing anything obvious. Also, I really don't know about the section titles in the article. They don't sound very good to me, but I couldn't think of a better way to divide them at the time. The names and section-break placement are open for discussion.
I'd like to get this article up to GA standards if we can. —
OranL (
talk)
08:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Too short to be judged. The citation-tags need fixing, the article should be expanded to go further the stub status, and the last stubby section is a "Personal Life" or "Family" section; note what its heading declares.-- Yannismarou ( talk) 19:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated with the aid of a semi-automatic javascript program.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The lead should have an appropriate number of paragraphs, and should adequately summarize the article. [?]
- This article has few images. Please see if there are any further free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non- fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload. [?]
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006. [?]
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as it could be. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]
- Very short sections should ideally be either expanded or merged.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 14:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)