GA level article targeting now FA. IMHO, the article starts to have at least partial FA quality. Please comment on the possible shortcomings and suggest improvements. Contributions to the article are naturally very welcome! -- Drieakko 12:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
This article is definitely a good article, and with a little improvement should be FA. After taking a look at the article these are my suggestions...
Other than forgetting to reference a few places you've done a great job on a complicated subject. If it's at all possible to incorporate the links in the See Also section into the main article please do. I also assume there are no external links? He doesn't have a blog or myspace page I suppose ;). If you're ready, then take it to FA. Psych less 19:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
GA level article targeting now FA. IMHO, the article starts to have at least partial FA quality. Please comment on the possible shortcomings and suggest improvements. Contributions to the article are naturally very welcome! -- Drieakko 12:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
This article is definitely a good article, and with a little improvement should be FA. After taking a look at the article these are my suggestions...
Other than forgetting to reference a few places you've done a great job on a complicated subject. If it's at all possible to incorporate the links in the See Also section into the main article please do. I also assume there are no external links? He doesn't have a blog or myspace page I suppose ;). If you're ready, then take it to FA. Psych less 19:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)