This article on a South African politician was a stub with hardly any info in it. It is now completely rewritten, with references and sources, portrait and infobox links to WikiSource etc. Currently a B-status is looked for, with GA-status or above hoped for, when the remaining section of Reitz as cultural figure is completed, and some more editing has further improved the article. Michel Doortmont ( talk) 13:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
B-status has been issued by an independent reviewer. Michel Doortmont ( talk) 18:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated with the aid of a semi-automatic javascript program:
{{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}}
along with the required parameters to the article - see
Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
[?]{{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}}
inserted.You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 12:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
All of the above comments have been worked on rigourously and subsequenly the article was put up for Good Article (GA) status. Please assist in making this happen! Michel Doortmont ( talk) 00:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This article on a South African politician was a stub with hardly any info in it. It is now completely rewritten, with references and sources, portrait and infobox links to WikiSource etc. Currently a B-status is looked for, with GA-status or above hoped for, when the remaining section of Reitz as cultural figure is completed, and some more editing has further improved the article. Michel Doortmont ( talk) 13:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
B-status has been issued by an independent reviewer. Michel Doortmont ( talk) 18:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated with the aid of a semi-automatic javascript program:
{{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}}
along with the required parameters to the article - see
Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.
[?]{{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}}
inserted.You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan ( talk) 12:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
All of the above comments have been worked on rigourously and subsequenly the article was put up for Good Article (GA) status. Please assist in making this happen! Michel Doortmont ( talk) 00:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)