- a previous peer review was conducted on January 2nd, 2007 and is now archived here
It's been over a year and a half since the last review. Since then I've cleaned up and reorganized the article, and added more references to improve it. I'd like to get some fresh advice from the community regarding what else I should do to continue improving the article towards Good Article status. -- Maelwys ( talk) 14:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Review by User:Anne Teedham
I would like to suggest to you that you reach out to a copy-edit volunteer. Anne Teedham ( talk) 17:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice, I'll try that. -- Maelwys ( talk) 18:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- a previous peer review was conducted on January 2nd, 2007 and is now archived here
It's been over a year and a half since the last review. Since then I've cleaned up and reorganized the article, and added more references to improve it. I'd like to get some fresh advice from the community regarding what else I should do to continue improving the article towards Good Article status. -- Maelwys ( talk) 14:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Review by User:Anne Teedham
I would like to suggest to you that you reach out to a copy-edit volunteer. Anne Teedham ( talk) 17:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice, I'll try that. -- Maelwys ( talk) 18:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)