Respectfully request a peer review of the article about a military aircraft accident. I'm taking somewhat of a break from WWII articles I guess. Thank you in advance. Cla68 08:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Wow, that's a well-written and interesting article. Great photos too. My only input is minor: are you aware that some grammarians hate the phrase "due to"? See, for example, here. I mention this because you use it 5 or 6 times in a short article. Surely a phrase like:
would be better phrased as:
I'm no grammarian, but I only use "due to" when it is preceded by "was" or "is". I think. — Kevin Myers 15:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Very nice, but a few minor issues that need to be looked at:
Kirill Lokshin 01:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Respectfully request a peer review of the article about a military aircraft accident. I'm taking somewhat of a break from WWII articles I guess. Thank you in advance. Cla68 08:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Wow, that's a well-written and interesting article. Great photos too. My only input is minor: are you aware that some grammarians hate the phrase "due to"? See, for example, here. I mention this because you use it 5 or 6 times in a short article. Surely a phrase like:
would be better phrased as:
I'm no grammarian, but I only use "due to" when it is preceded by "was" or "is". I think. — Kevin Myers 15:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Very nice, but a few minor issues that need to be looked at:
Kirill Lokshin 01:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)