I am nominating this article for A-class review, in light of the article's improvements following successful GA assessment and incorporation of suggestions from FA sibling article Boeing 767. Regards, SynergyStar ( talk) 22:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I haven't done much editing to this article, so I'm going to take the liberty to review it.
More reviewing to come... — Comp dude 123 16:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Okay, here's my review of the rest of this article:
Overall, this is a great article and is pretty close to FA status and definitely ready to be promoted to A-Class. Great work on this article! — Comp dude 123 04:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments. As always feel free to revert my copyediting. I made the following changes:
The wiki is running slow, so I'll finish up with comments here:
I am nominating this article for A-class review, in light of the article's improvements following successful GA assessment and incorporation of suggestions from FA sibling article Boeing 767. Regards, SynergyStar ( talk) 22:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
I haven't done much editing to this article, so I'm going to take the liberty to review it.
More reviewing to come... — Comp dude 123 16:58, 24 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Okay, here's my review of the rest of this article:
Overall, this is a great article and is pretty close to FA status and definitely ready to be promoted to A-Class. Great work on this article! — Comp dude 123 04:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Comments. As always feel free to revert my copyediting. I made the following changes:
The wiki is running slow, so I'll finish up with comments here: