Thanks for accepting the article before the season started. I'm sure someone is working on the companion page for the women's team, the Orlando Pride. Orlando City B is not going to field a team this year.
GreyGreenWhy ( talk) 20:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
-- Rafaelsantino ( talk) 23:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Yourmistake ( talk) 09:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
I can't find the link to the article anywhere? I'm not sure it's been published..
Not very quickly! But, I know how hard it is! There are tons of articles in review!
I suppose follow up as best as possible? I can't find the link to the article anywhere? I'm not sure it's been published.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yesterdaysfire ( talk • contribs) 00:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Not at all! My submission received some comments and declined. Then I contacted the reviewer and answered his comments. He then accepted the submission. But quickly another reviewer rejected my submission!
After about one week.
There should be one reviewer in charge. Different reviewers with different subjective views just waste our own and their own time and redirect us to multiple directions. Thus, I ask you to reconsider my submission. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Literarum fan ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
i find impossible to create a biography article- please help
quickly enough, thanks
Thank you for changing a category of the article "Isaac Itkind". Would highly appreciate instructions to create a Biography article Thank you ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irapliss ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
JameswoodSK ( talk) 03:22, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes
Below 24h
NO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.239.252.124 ( talk) 13:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
The article is class C, meaning that it "it may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style."
Since the information is biographical, it is, by definition, not fictional. There seems to be no issue with citation, so it appears to come down to clarity, balance, or flow, or policy violation. Is there an issue of bias, perhaps? I have tried to eliminate bias by sourcing practically everything and not using subjective language, i.e., no opinions are being expressed, except those of others coming from published reviews. I chose actually, not to quote reviews, precisely because they might be considered biased and selective. The objective was to put out an artist's life-time career that the world might have an interest in, especially in light of some cultural issues of general interest provoked by her work.
Is this where I need some input? Thank you. Pmuehlen ( talk) 13:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
E.G. Is this a talk page - if 'yes', I have to end with tildes. If not (I've simply been asked for feedback) I could simply click a 'submit' button as in other sites. But, no, I have a 'publish changes ' option. What changes? I haven't made any changes to anything.If it's a 'project page' then I don't have to sign with tildes (?)
Already we have a simple concept drowning in ambguity (not actually the kind of thing any real editor enjoys or would encourage). In the process of trying to be exhaustive the participant is exhausted.....ad victoribus spolia.
Now, let's see; do I publish changes? No, there are no changes. Do I sign with tildes? No, this is not a 'talk page'...I suppose the 'change' is that there was a blank page and now...there isn't ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeQuinceyMalden ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes.I appreciated the advice, and the links with instructions from reviewers were very good.(Referencing is not an easy thing, even though I am an academic...)
Initial submission took a while (maybe 6 weeks?). But then, once I fixed the references (which were the problem for the initial decline), then it only took less than 24 hours for the article to be approved.
Not sure. I guess I would appreciate any advice on this article, and how to improve it - it will help not just with this one, but for the future. I will go to the talk sections.
regards yakshaver
Yes
Reasonably fast
This was my first effort. I felt my subject was going to be acceptable. Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Answ3rback227 ( talk • contribs) 20:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- "Reads like an advertisement" - really? what exactly does that mean when nothing is being sold and nothing is being promoted?
- "Inadequate references" - which ones? why?
Referring the author to the standard pages on how to write your first article (and so on) is not really helpful. I have been working as an academic for more than 30 years and (like most working professionals) I believe I know exactly what is meant by "verifiable" and "independent". If I reviewed my students' work like this I would soon have no students and no tenure ... but we are not trying to emulate academic work here (are we?). We now face the key question: how much effort *should* be or *could* be put into the review process? It seems to me that at least *highlighting* is needed to draw the authors attention to the references (or portions of the text) that are seen as problematic. Or a two stage process? In my most recent case (the first time I found myself in the review process in more than ten years' contributing) the reviewer was generous enough to make an email address available, and one simple email exchange (and some work on the part of the reviewer) sorted things out. I guess I might have been lucky? AndyB ( talk) 08:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes.
A few weeks.
No - very happy. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WJDB ( talk • contribs) 11:46, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
How to insert His Excellency Pan Sorasak picture? Please see the sample as attached. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saray sin ( talk • contribs) 09:56, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
There has been a spate of admin nominating articles about musicians for deletion that clearly fit the criteria of being notable. I suggest that people familiarise themselves more with the second point of WP:MUSICBIO Technohead1980 ( talk) 15:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for accepting the article before the season started. I'm sure someone is working on the companion page for the women's team, the Orlando Pride. Orlando City B is not going to field a team this year.
GreyGreenWhy ( talk) 20:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
-- Rafaelsantino ( talk) 23:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Yourmistake ( talk) 09:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
I can't find the link to the article anywhere? I'm not sure it's been published..
Not very quickly! But, I know how hard it is! There are tons of articles in review!
I suppose follow up as best as possible? I can't find the link to the article anywhere? I'm not sure it's been published.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yesterdaysfire ( talk • contribs) 00:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Not at all! My submission received some comments and declined. Then I contacted the reviewer and answered his comments. He then accepted the submission. But quickly another reviewer rejected my submission!
After about one week.
There should be one reviewer in charge. Different reviewers with different subjective views just waste our own and their own time and redirect us to multiple directions. Thus, I ask you to reconsider my submission. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Literarum fan ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
i find impossible to create a biography article- please help
quickly enough, thanks
Thank you for changing a category of the article "Isaac Itkind". Would highly appreciate instructions to create a Biography article Thank you ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irapliss ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
JameswoodSK ( talk) 03:22, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes
Below 24h
NO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.239.252.124 ( talk) 13:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
The article is class C, meaning that it "it may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style."
Since the information is biographical, it is, by definition, not fictional. There seems to be no issue with citation, so it appears to come down to clarity, balance, or flow, or policy violation. Is there an issue of bias, perhaps? I have tried to eliminate bias by sourcing practically everything and not using subjective language, i.e., no opinions are being expressed, except those of others coming from published reviews. I chose actually, not to quote reviews, precisely because they might be considered biased and selective. The objective was to put out an artist's life-time career that the world might have an interest in, especially in light of some cultural issues of general interest provoked by her work.
Is this where I need some input? Thank you. Pmuehlen ( talk) 13:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
E.G. Is this a talk page - if 'yes', I have to end with tildes. If not (I've simply been asked for feedback) I could simply click a 'submit' button as in other sites. But, no, I have a 'publish changes ' option. What changes? I haven't made any changes to anything.If it's a 'project page' then I don't have to sign with tildes (?)
Already we have a simple concept drowning in ambguity (not actually the kind of thing any real editor enjoys or would encourage). In the process of trying to be exhaustive the participant is exhausted.....ad victoribus spolia.
Now, let's see; do I publish changes? No, there are no changes. Do I sign with tildes? No, this is not a 'talk page'...I suppose the 'change' is that there was a blank page and now...there isn't ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeQuinceyMalden ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes.I appreciated the advice, and the links with instructions from reviewers were very good.(Referencing is not an easy thing, even though I am an academic...)
Initial submission took a while (maybe 6 weeks?). But then, once I fixed the references (which were the problem for the initial decline), then it only took less than 24 hours for the article to be approved.
Not sure. I guess I would appreciate any advice on this article, and how to improve it - it will help not just with this one, but for the future. I will go to the talk sections.
regards yakshaver
Yes
Reasonably fast
This was my first effort. I felt my subject was going to be acceptable. Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Answ3rback227 ( talk • contribs) 20:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- "Reads like an advertisement" - really? what exactly does that mean when nothing is being sold and nothing is being promoted?
- "Inadequate references" - which ones? why?
Referring the author to the standard pages on how to write your first article (and so on) is not really helpful. I have been working as an academic for more than 30 years and (like most working professionals) I believe I know exactly what is meant by "verifiable" and "independent". If I reviewed my students' work like this I would soon have no students and no tenure ... but we are not trying to emulate academic work here (are we?). We now face the key question: how much effort *should* be or *could* be put into the review process? It seems to me that at least *highlighting* is needed to draw the authors attention to the references (or portions of the text) that are seen as problematic. Or a two stage process? In my most recent case (the first time I found myself in the review process in more than ten years' contributing) the reviewer was generous enough to make an email address available, and one simple email exchange (and some work on the part of the reviewer) sorted things out. I guess I might have been lucky? AndyB ( talk) 08:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes.
A few weeks.
No - very happy. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WJDB ( talk • contribs) 11:46, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
How to insert His Excellency Pan Sorasak picture? Please see the sample as attached. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saray sin ( talk • contribs) 09:56, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
There has been a spate of admin nominating articles about musicians for deletion that clearly fit the criteria of being notable. I suggest that people familiarise themselves more with the second point of WP:MUSICBIO Technohead1980 ( talk) 15:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)