Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< June 12 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 14 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I created an entirely new artist page and tried saving the draft. For some reason, it doesn't let me. I cannot see the article or edit anything. Please help AZaMas ( talk) 02:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
HOW. you were saying it wasn't notable even though i knew it was. Now there exists a page on this topic! even though i made it first! ( Personal attack removed) HarryNewart ( talk) 04:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Dear all, my submission was rejected. However, I followed the same structure, style and I provided the same sources of another submission that instead is accepted and published ( /info/en/?search=Jamshed_Bomanji). Can you please tell me what it is different? Any help would be useful.
FRAIOLI73 ( talk) 08:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
i don't understand why my article is rejected. plz, tell me what changes should I have to make to make it acceptable. plz, highlight the mistake. Mirkha Shahbaz ( talk) 08:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for the quick rejection! You rejected this article before my submission for review! Can it be submitted by extending and adding more references or is it rejected because I am the author of the base method? Anyway, the promotion of a method is not an advertisement! Please clarify the reason.
Regards Dr. Shahram Salami
Shsalami ( talk) 11:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I have read about COI. And I think people might find I am too connected to Ancestris to write about it. I am one of the volunteers for this program, writing the Dutch documentation there. I saw sofar no Wikipedia page for the Ancestris program existed. So I decided to write one or at least to write anything here. I am trying to be as objective as possible. So not advertising but just describe.
I take the Gramps page as an example (also a genealogy program) and that page is accepted, so if i try to do it the same way i hope its acceptable too. So I would appreciate if i can get some advise about how to proceed. Its still draft, because it misses a lot and many links should be added to make it follow the wikipedia standards.
Thanks for reading, Tineke Mother10 ( talk) 12:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
how can i start same article MANISHSWAMI01 ( talk) 12:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I need some help here, the Luan_Muça is a well know businessman in Albania and mention in a lot of independent websites Alban2024 ( talk) 13:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, This is my first time trying to contribute, can somebody tell me what is wrong with this article? It is a copy of the German version of the Wikipedia page. So I am not sure why it was rejected. It has all the reputable sources as well. Ali4abs ( talk) 13:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
"I doubt the reason is notability"– just to clarify, this draft wasn't declined for notability reasons; I was saying that's why I would have declined it. And even I'm not saying that the subject isn't notable, I'm saying the sources currently cited don't prove that it is notable. It may well be, but this isn't evident. The evidence we need to see is described in the relevant notability guideline WP:ORG.
"I did not know I was not allowed to do inline citation"– no, you are more or less required to do inline citations; you are not allowed to do inline external links, which is what you've done. You can reference the same external resources, but instead of just pointing to them with a link, you cite them using the appropriate citation template, eg. {{ cite web}}. See WP:REFB and WP:ILC for advice.
"Most sources are also very reliable sources at least in Germany"– I'm not (necessarily) saying that your sources aren't reliable; I'm saying they don't meet the full criteria of a source which contributes towards notability per WP:ORG, namely being at once reliable, and entirely independent of the subject, and secondary (newspapers, magazines, TV and radio programmes, books, etc.), and providing significant coverage of the subject. In other words, reliability is important, but it isn't enough.
The submission was declined. The page of the previous ambassador András Kocsis was not. Please let me know which changes I need to make to the draft in order for it to be accepted. Thank you in advance, kind regards Embassyhunl ( talk) 14:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
What is wrong with the article. Gabriel (talk to me ) 14:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to submit my article please Dgatopoulos ( talk) 17:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
My submission has been rejected for a third time, for "insufficient" content and encouraged to be merged with another tiny and incomplete draft. This is ridiculous. I spent the last few weeks trying to bring it in line with the "Manual of Style" and it has 40 different and verifiable sources and far more content in every way possible. I am aware of the existence of the original page in the Draft space, but it is meant to be a placeholder for what I put together and the author of that particular draft knows this. That page was rejected previously at the author's request. My biggest mistake when I began was to work in the "sandbox" rather than in that "Draft" page and I am sorry for that.
But please, can someone look at this: /info/en/?search=Draft:Felix_Albrecht_Harta_(2) and the other one without the 2, and compare and let me know where I should go from here. Thank you. Mightythos77 ( talk) 18:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Emily is well known. Her page was rewrite few months ago and wasn't reviewed. Can someone please review it? Thanks Shinaimm ( talk) 21:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
My first draft of this page was declined with this reason "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources.". The sources I have used are considered very reputable in the Art world in Australia, also the newspaper cited is one of the main papers in Victoria, Australia. I just made a minor edit to include links to one of the main public galleries in Australia. I have based these sources on wikipedia pages for other Australian artists. If you still consider this inadequate please provide additional details about the inadequacy. Thanks Stoja2024 Stoja2024 ( talk) 23:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Dear Help Desk,
I would like to create an English version of the following page. Reference page: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AE%97%E6%9C%AC%E5%BA%B7%E5%85%B5
So far, I have tried to modify it according to the instructions, but in the end it was rejected.
How can I post the English version on Wikipedia in the future?
I just want to post an existing Japanese page translated into English.
Thank you. 183.77.158.192 ( talk) 23:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< June 12 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 14 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I created an entirely new artist page and tried saving the draft. For some reason, it doesn't let me. I cannot see the article or edit anything. Please help AZaMas ( talk) 02:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
HOW. you were saying it wasn't notable even though i knew it was. Now there exists a page on this topic! even though i made it first! ( Personal attack removed) HarryNewart ( talk) 04:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Dear all, my submission was rejected. However, I followed the same structure, style and I provided the same sources of another submission that instead is accepted and published ( /info/en/?search=Jamshed_Bomanji). Can you please tell me what it is different? Any help would be useful.
FRAIOLI73 ( talk) 08:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
i don't understand why my article is rejected. plz, tell me what changes should I have to make to make it acceptable. plz, highlight the mistake. Mirkha Shahbaz ( talk) 08:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for the quick rejection! You rejected this article before my submission for review! Can it be submitted by extending and adding more references or is it rejected because I am the author of the base method? Anyway, the promotion of a method is not an advertisement! Please clarify the reason.
Regards Dr. Shahram Salami
Shsalami ( talk) 11:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I have read about COI. And I think people might find I am too connected to Ancestris to write about it. I am one of the volunteers for this program, writing the Dutch documentation there. I saw sofar no Wikipedia page for the Ancestris program existed. So I decided to write one or at least to write anything here. I am trying to be as objective as possible. So not advertising but just describe.
I take the Gramps page as an example (also a genealogy program) and that page is accepted, so if i try to do it the same way i hope its acceptable too. So I would appreciate if i can get some advise about how to proceed. Its still draft, because it misses a lot and many links should be added to make it follow the wikipedia standards.
Thanks for reading, Tineke Mother10 ( talk) 12:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
how can i start same article MANISHSWAMI01 ( talk) 12:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I need some help here, the Luan_Muça is a well know businessman in Albania and mention in a lot of independent websites Alban2024 ( talk) 13:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, This is my first time trying to contribute, can somebody tell me what is wrong with this article? It is a copy of the German version of the Wikipedia page. So I am not sure why it was rejected. It has all the reputable sources as well. Ali4abs ( talk) 13:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
"I doubt the reason is notability"– just to clarify, this draft wasn't declined for notability reasons; I was saying that's why I would have declined it. And even I'm not saying that the subject isn't notable, I'm saying the sources currently cited don't prove that it is notable. It may well be, but this isn't evident. The evidence we need to see is described in the relevant notability guideline WP:ORG.
"I did not know I was not allowed to do inline citation"– no, you are more or less required to do inline citations; you are not allowed to do inline external links, which is what you've done. You can reference the same external resources, but instead of just pointing to them with a link, you cite them using the appropriate citation template, eg. {{ cite web}}. See WP:REFB and WP:ILC for advice.
"Most sources are also very reliable sources at least in Germany"– I'm not (necessarily) saying that your sources aren't reliable; I'm saying they don't meet the full criteria of a source which contributes towards notability per WP:ORG, namely being at once reliable, and entirely independent of the subject, and secondary (newspapers, magazines, TV and radio programmes, books, etc.), and providing significant coverage of the subject. In other words, reliability is important, but it isn't enough.
The submission was declined. The page of the previous ambassador András Kocsis was not. Please let me know which changes I need to make to the draft in order for it to be accepted. Thank you in advance, kind regards Embassyhunl ( talk) 14:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
What is wrong with the article. Gabriel (talk to me ) 14:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
I want to submit my article please Dgatopoulos ( talk) 17:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
My submission has been rejected for a third time, for "insufficient" content and encouraged to be merged with another tiny and incomplete draft. This is ridiculous. I spent the last few weeks trying to bring it in line with the "Manual of Style" and it has 40 different and verifiable sources and far more content in every way possible. I am aware of the existence of the original page in the Draft space, but it is meant to be a placeholder for what I put together and the author of that particular draft knows this. That page was rejected previously at the author's request. My biggest mistake when I began was to work in the "sandbox" rather than in that "Draft" page and I am sorry for that.
But please, can someone look at this: /info/en/?search=Draft:Felix_Albrecht_Harta_(2) and the other one without the 2, and compare and let me know where I should go from here. Thank you. Mightythos77 ( talk) 18:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Emily is well known. Her page was rewrite few months ago and wasn't reviewed. Can someone please review it? Thanks Shinaimm ( talk) 21:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
My first draft of this page was declined with this reason "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources.". The sources I have used are considered very reputable in the Art world in Australia, also the newspaper cited is one of the main papers in Victoria, Australia. I just made a minor edit to include links to one of the main public galleries in Australia. I have based these sources on wikipedia pages for other Australian artists. If you still consider this inadequate please provide additional details about the inadequacy. Thanks Stoja2024 Stoja2024 ( talk) 23:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Dear Help Desk,
I would like to create an English version of the following page. Reference page: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AE%97%E6%9C%AC%E5%BA%B7%E5%85%B5
So far, I have tried to modify it according to the instructions, but in the end it was rejected.
How can I post the English version on Wikipedia in the future?
I just want to post an existing Japanese page translated into English.
Thank you. 183.77.158.192 ( talk) 23:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)