Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 3 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 5 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hello,
Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thank you.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 02:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I do not know why every reviewer of this draft gave the comment that it is not notable as it is not really possible to give only show reviews as a reliable reference because not every Indian newspaper gives only reviews about the tv shows in their articles. It will always have to do with launch dates, actors and other short descriptions about the show. Why are the reviewers so adamant about the draft to be having only reviews to show notability that and they don't give the article any chance? Does that mean this show Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana does not even deserve an article in Wikipedia? This show has been on-air for the past two months and has satisfied both WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG but the reviewers gave some or the other reasons and kept declining the submissions. There is also a additional claim that the people are paid and are promoting the show. I really don't know about the others but I'm neither paid nor do I want to promote the show but I am a fan of the show. Can please do something about Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. I can understand the issues of disruptive editing but for that can't the article be protected once it is published? Or can you atleast reduce the page protection required for it's creation given to atleast the extended confirmed users than the administrators? Because no administrator is interested in contributing to the creation of this page. I humbly request please help with Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. Thank you-- 117.193.136.129 ( talk) 05:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
What is your connexion to the show?The only answer to this question is that I am a really ardent fan of the show. You know that special feel which you get when something touches your heart. I get the same with this show and I feel really sad that this is only show in Star Plus which does have any article in Wikipedia while one of it's upcoming shows like Dance Plus (season 6) has a Wikipedia article with "just three sources where one is not even reliable" which makes it clear that it has not at all fulfilled WP:GNG. I don't know if I can ask this but then why is the Wikipedia admin so careless about such articles as Dance Plus (season 6) but are very strict not to have an article for Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana which has the potential to fulfill both WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG? Not trying to offend anyone here just asking.
"ultra-level protection" is not a thing and we do not use protection to enforce contentIsn't there any other way out such that an proper article is created on the show while protecting it so that no disruptive or paid editing is done? That is what I asked.
Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks, as far as I am aware, do not review draftsNo I don't want them to review drafts. I want them to create a proper Wikipedia article for this show. As of now only an administrator can create an article which as far as I know none of the admin is interested to contribute. If the article creation access is given also to the "extended confirmed users" then the very best editors and article creators of Indian Shows which as far as I know are only Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks can create the article with what Wikipedia needs in the article. I'm 100% sure that Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks will value all that the Wikipedia needs for a good article on WP:TVSHOW. You can check their edit history, they always have created the best articles of Indian Shows or even better if they are eligible give them the admin access to create this article.-- 117.193.136.129 ( talk) 07:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Isn't there any other way out such that an proper article is created on the show while protecting it so that no disruptive or paid editing is done?No. Protection is reactive. We don't protect a page in anticipation issues will arise; we protect pages in response to issues already occurring - such as repeatedly re-crating an article while disregarding the deletion debate that resulted in its initial deletion.
I don't want them to review drafts. I want them to create a proper Wikipedia article for this show.We will not compel users to write about articles that they do not wish to write about; historically any such compulsions for editors have been due to outside influences and not an editorial mandate. Given the history here, I would be very surprised if they wanted to try their hand at this without drafting the page first. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
I have added 8 refernces to the article already. 3 of the references(story published by newspapers) have their own wikipedia pages. All the 8 refernces directly target the person or refer to the person(actually all 8 have published a story of the subject in their newspapers, separately from 2 years, as you can check the date of the articles, among which 3 newspapers have their own wikipedia pages in which the subject's story was published. The last time I included around 15 news media portals/newspapers (in URL form) that have taken forecasts from the subject, one of the reviewers told me there is no need to mention it as the subject is enough notable and would obviously be in the newspaper. So, I removed the list. Should I add all of them again? or you would allow publishing of the wikipedia page. Please take a look into this. Thanking you in anticipation. Weatherforyou ( talk) 06:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Laveatein (
talk)
12:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thank you. Laveatein ( talk) 12:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I am a reviewer at Afc. Accordingly, can I myself review my pages, and approve my drafts? Gyan Know contributions? 12:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I resubmitted my article after making it a simple read and not any sort of paid advertisement. But still the reviewer rejected it. Please do suggest me how else can I change the article to get that approved.
Akshaypatil510 (
talk)
12:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
What name should I use then to edit ? Also please let me know how to prove that I'm not a paid editor. Because honestly I'm not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 ( talk • contribs) 12:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Will that solve the problem and the article be approved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 ( talk • contribs) 13:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Also as suggested can I knowhow to do mandatory disclosure, I'm bit messed up and can't find where to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 ( talk • contribs) 13:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Greetings for the day.! I've removed all the unnecessary information from the draft. Request you to kindly review the same once more. Sajidnasar4 ( talk) 14:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Please edit article and give feedback for submission. Thank you. Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 16:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Michaelse2002 (
talk)
16:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thanks — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mokbul7000 (
talk •
contribs)
17:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Mokbul7000 ( talk) 17:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I am a reviewer at Afc. I created this page. I need some other editor to accept it on my behalf, because I'm finding it immoral accepting my own pages. Gyan Know contributions? 17:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello. The draft (link above) was deleted speedily, even though I contested it, so the link will only take you to a blank "new document" page. I have been a Wikipedia editor for over 12 years, but have not created a brand new article, yet. I am well acquainted with Wikipedia markup, etc.
I have been hired as a freelance writer by a company, FlexTeam, who has a client who feels that their large company "Happy Returns" is a notable company and they would like an article on Wikipedia. I have declared paid conflict-of-interest in every possible section as I have worked on the draft.
I understand that the article was not admitted because of section G11 criteria and I would like your advice on how to create a simple article for Happy Returns company which just states facts, cites many accurate sources and does not appear to be an advertisement. Might I just create a draft with a company infobox? My understanding is that Happy Returns is a fairly large player in the consumer industry and would therefore be a notable article for Wikipedia. Please, let me know your advice. Thanks. Spncrinc ( talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Spncrinc ( talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
That was super helpful! Exactly what I needed to know. Thanks again for taking the time to go through it and explain it to me. Spncrinc ( talk) 00:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting help as both drafts have been declined. Thank you.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 19:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
How are my sources not reliable? All of my sources referred to the actual websites.
Market News 101 (
talk)
20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Need help with citing references. Thanks.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 20:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
How do I improve this article? Thanks.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 20:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello there I need some assistance on editing my article since I am still un familiar with wikipedia's format
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Marukome1981 (
talk)
21:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
SavetheTreeSBro (
talk)
23:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
``You Were rude Why cant There be Another It was Kind of you not to just Decline and not Leave a message it was ruude though mine was about the local area of ovedio so its kinda rude of you to just shatter my WHOLE ARTICLE under no circumstances So Can you please Allow me to `` -Dear SL93 -
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 3 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 5 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hello,
Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thank you.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 02:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I do not know why every reviewer of this draft gave the comment that it is not notable as it is not really possible to give only show reviews as a reliable reference because not every Indian newspaper gives only reviews about the tv shows in their articles. It will always have to do with launch dates, actors and other short descriptions about the show. Why are the reviewers so adamant about the draft to be having only reviews to show notability that and they don't give the article any chance? Does that mean this show Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana does not even deserve an article in Wikipedia? This show has been on-air for the past two months and has satisfied both WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG but the reviewers gave some or the other reasons and kept declining the submissions. There is also a additional claim that the people are paid and are promoting the show. I really don't know about the others but I'm neither paid nor do I want to promote the show but I am a fan of the show. Can please do something about Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. I can understand the issues of disruptive editing but for that can't the article be protected once it is published? Or can you atleast reduce the page protection required for it's creation given to atleast the extended confirmed users than the administrators? Because no administrator is interested in contributing to the creation of this page. I humbly request please help with Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. Thank you-- 117.193.136.129 ( talk) 05:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
What is your connexion to the show?The only answer to this question is that I am a really ardent fan of the show. You know that special feel which you get when something touches your heart. I get the same with this show and I feel really sad that this is only show in Star Plus which does have any article in Wikipedia while one of it's upcoming shows like Dance Plus (season 6) has a Wikipedia article with "just three sources where one is not even reliable" which makes it clear that it has not at all fulfilled WP:GNG. I don't know if I can ask this but then why is the Wikipedia admin so careless about such articles as Dance Plus (season 6) but are very strict not to have an article for Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana which has the potential to fulfill both WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG? Not trying to offend anyone here just asking.
"ultra-level protection" is not a thing and we do not use protection to enforce contentIsn't there any other way out such that an proper article is created on the show while protecting it so that no disruptive or paid editing is done? That is what I asked.
Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks, as far as I am aware, do not review draftsNo I don't want them to review drafts. I want them to create a proper Wikipedia article for this show. As of now only an administrator can create an article which as far as I know none of the admin is interested to contribute. If the article creation access is given also to the "extended confirmed users" then the very best editors and article creators of Indian Shows which as far as I know are only Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks can create the article with what Wikipedia needs in the article. I'm 100% sure that Shinnosuke15 and Mann Rocks will value all that the Wikipedia needs for a good article on WP:TVSHOW. You can check their edit history, they always have created the best articles of Indian Shows or even better if they are eligible give them the admin access to create this article.-- 117.193.136.129 ( talk) 07:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Isn't there any other way out such that an proper article is created on the show while protecting it so that no disruptive or paid editing is done?No. Protection is reactive. We don't protect a page in anticipation issues will arise; we protect pages in response to issues already occurring - such as repeatedly re-crating an article while disregarding the deletion debate that resulted in its initial deletion.
I don't want them to review drafts. I want them to create a proper Wikipedia article for this show.We will not compel users to write about articles that they do not wish to write about; historically any such compulsions for editors have been due to outside influences and not an editorial mandate. Given the history here, I would be very surprised if they wanted to try their hand at this without drafting the page first. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 22:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
I have added 8 refernces to the article already. 3 of the references(story published by newspapers) have their own wikipedia pages. All the 8 refernces directly target the person or refer to the person(actually all 8 have published a story of the subject in their newspapers, separately from 2 years, as you can check the date of the articles, among which 3 newspapers have their own wikipedia pages in which the subject's story was published. The last time I included around 15 news media portals/newspapers (in URL form) that have taken forecasts from the subject, one of the reviewers told me there is no need to mention it as the subject is enough notable and would obviously be in the newspaper. So, I removed the list. Should I add all of them again? or you would allow publishing of the wikipedia page. Please take a look into this. Thanking you in anticipation. Weatherforyou ( talk) 06:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Laveatein (
talk)
12:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thank you. Laveatein ( talk) 12:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I am a reviewer at Afc. Accordingly, can I myself review my pages, and approve my drafts? Gyan Know contributions? 12:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I resubmitted my article after making it a simple read and not any sort of paid advertisement. But still the reviewer rejected it. Please do suggest me how else can I change the article to get that approved.
Akshaypatil510 (
talk)
12:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
What name should I use then to edit ? Also please let me know how to prove that I'm not a paid editor. Because honestly I'm not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 ( talk • contribs) 12:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Will that solve the problem and the article be approved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 ( talk • contribs) 13:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Also as suggested can I knowhow to do mandatory disclosure, I'm bit messed up and can't find where to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatil510 ( talk • contribs) 13:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Greetings for the day.! I've removed all the unnecessary information from the draft. Request you to kindly review the same once more. Sajidnasar4 ( talk) 14:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Please edit article and give feedback for submission. Thank you. Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 16:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Michaelse2002 (
talk)
16:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Would like to know if any edits are necessary for draft to be accepted. Thanks — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mokbul7000 (
talk •
contribs)
17:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Mokbul7000 ( talk) 17:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I am a reviewer at Afc. I created this page. I need some other editor to accept it on my behalf, because I'm finding it immoral accepting my own pages. Gyan Know contributions? 17:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello. The draft (link above) was deleted speedily, even though I contested it, so the link will only take you to a blank "new document" page. I have been a Wikipedia editor for over 12 years, but have not created a brand new article, yet. I am well acquainted with Wikipedia markup, etc.
I have been hired as a freelance writer by a company, FlexTeam, who has a client who feels that their large company "Happy Returns" is a notable company and they would like an article on Wikipedia. I have declared paid conflict-of-interest in every possible section as I have worked on the draft.
I understand that the article was not admitted because of section G11 criteria and I would like your advice on how to create a simple article for Happy Returns company which just states facts, cites many accurate sources and does not appear to be an advertisement. Might I just create a draft with a company infobox? My understanding is that Happy Returns is a fairly large player in the consumer industry and would therefore be a notable article for Wikipedia. Please, let me know your advice. Thanks. Spncrinc ( talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Spncrinc ( talk) 17:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
That was super helpful! Exactly what I needed to know. Thanks again for taking the time to go through it and explain it to me. Spncrinc ( talk) 00:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Requesting help as both drafts have been declined. Thank you.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 19:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
How are my sources not reliable? All of my sources referred to the actual websites.
Market News 101 (
talk)
20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Need help with citing references. Thanks.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 20:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
How do I improve this article? Thanks.
Howdyfreshhhhh ( talk) 20:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello there I need some assistance on editing my article since I am still un familiar with wikipedia's format
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Marukome1981 (
talk)
21:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
SavetheTreeSBro (
talk)
23:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
``You Were rude Why cant There be Another It was Kind of you not to just Decline and not Leave a message it was ruude though mine was about the local area of ovedio so its kinda rude of you to just shatter my WHOLE ARTICLE under no circumstances So Can you please Allow me to `` -Dear SL93 -