Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 18 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 20 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
45.64.11.91 (
talk)
04:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi All, first of all, I am sorry for trying to create the page again and again. I am new to wikipedia and don't know all the policies. When we first created the page, it was deleted and we realized that we can't have our page live without independent press coverage. Recently, we got covered in some of the top-notch publications and we thought to give it a try one more time. Our intention was not to spam wikipedia, please forgive us for our mistakes and please give us a fresh start and please review our draft afresh. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience caused to you all due to our ignorance. Irovvaul ( talk) 04:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
What are the reasons to reject my article so that I can work on them Maheshchulet2011 ( talk) 12:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I have added references and links that validate that the pageant is real and relevant to those living in County Cork (Ireland's largest County).
The event takes place every year and involves hundreds of people so I don't know what more to do to make this article qualify as being of public interest
Thanks
4mckeowns (
talk)
13:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The article is a biography of Kenneth Kimuli. He is popularly known as Pablo. Is it okay if I change the subject of the article to Kenneth Kimuli(Pablo)? Secondly, if one had put up their pictures on social media before and would prefer the picture to be put up on Wikipedia, does deleting the picture from the social media, e.g facebook, and using it on Wikipedia violate any copyrights?
Thanks
Mlajum ( talk) 14:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could explain how the article may not be sufficient for a Wikipedia page of its own? I'm at a bit of a loss as to how I can amend it.
Thank you MMcC321 ( talk) 15:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I am attempting to make a Wikipedia page for Ankura. Despite almost 10 citations to relevant materials regarding the company's creation, investments, acquisitions, and work, the article has been rejected. Many similar companies (i.e. Analysis Group, Cornerstone Research, etc. ) have less or similar cited materials in their articles.
Thus I would like to request help with the following: 1) Which of the citations listed in the article do not meet relevant criteria for reliability? I have reviewed the sections of Wikipedia's help page for reliability standards, but there is still some gray area on what can qualify. For instance, I have included a Bloomberg profile (having seen those used on several other articles!), but if that is not reliable I would still like to use the other source provided (an interview of the individual in question). 2) Given the nature of the article, I have added a few sources to some of the cited sections. Should I keep citations to one for each factoid, or are additional citations that demonstrate reliability better. 3) How many additional sources meeting the above criteria should be included? I did not want to over inundate the article page at first but if even more information is needed for approval then so be it. 3b) In the same way, are there sources I have listed that are considered not reliable that should be redacted all together? If so I am happy to remove them.
I appreciate any and all feedback on this manner. I am driven to make this happen!
Jwilson2032 ( talk) 16:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I created this page for Yiannis Papadopoulos it was declined 7 months ago. Since then I renewed all the sources and i updated the page quite a few times. Can someone please help me with this? I believe the article is in great standing, it's been seven months, at least please give me feedback regarding the page and if there's anything I can do to make it even better. This guy definitely deserves a Wiki page, he's won so many awards/ competition, he's touring around the world, and he's recognised and respected in the guitar community. Thank you for your time. Your help is greatly appreciated. Electra Roberts ( talk) 17:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Greetings. At a request from Whpq, I would like some help determining if my edits to the draft above are on the tright track. The original creator of the draft is Degacrowe9, but I made a few improvements to it. So, am I doing okay so far? Zanygenius( talk to me!)( email me!) 19:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
admin help}}
template.
Yunshui
雲
水
08:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I created this draft for a master planned community here in Nevada, Skye Canyon: /info/en/?search=Draft:Skye_Canyon,_Nevada
It seemed like the community warranted a Wikipedia article, since other master planned communities of similar size and significance also have articles ( /info/en/?search=Anthem,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Southern_Highlands,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Summerlin,_Nevada). In fact, Summerlin has 3 articles ( /info/en/?search=Summerlin,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Summerlin_South,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Sun_City_Summerlin,_Nevada).
My draft has been declined many times, and is still not approved for the following reasons:
- This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
- This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
However, when reviewing the pages of the other master planned communities, their sources don't meet this criteria any better than those on my draft. Skye Canyon is a huge, prominent, albeit new community here in Nevada (6,500 homes). How else can I show that this is a legitimate, noteworthy entity?
Any help is much appreciated. Thank you!
TJRobertson ( talk) 19:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
To whom it may concern,
I created this Wikipedia page approximately 8 Week ago and was on a 8 Week waiting list which today has jumped to 4 months. I was wondering if there was an explanation for this or a priority system? An explanation for the jump from 8 Weeks to 4 Months is all I'm seeking unless you would like to review the Wikipedia Article itself.
Thanks, Brandon C.T. Lee
Shibby182 (
talk)
23:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 18 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 20 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
45.64.11.91 (
talk)
04:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi All, first of all, I am sorry for trying to create the page again and again. I am new to wikipedia and don't know all the policies. When we first created the page, it was deleted and we realized that we can't have our page live without independent press coverage. Recently, we got covered in some of the top-notch publications and we thought to give it a try one more time. Our intention was not to spam wikipedia, please forgive us for our mistakes and please give us a fresh start and please review our draft afresh. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience caused to you all due to our ignorance. Irovvaul ( talk) 04:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
What are the reasons to reject my article so that I can work on them Maheshchulet2011 ( talk) 12:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I have added references and links that validate that the pageant is real and relevant to those living in County Cork (Ireland's largest County).
The event takes place every year and involves hundreds of people so I don't know what more to do to make this article qualify as being of public interest
Thanks
4mckeowns (
talk)
13:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
The article is a biography of Kenneth Kimuli. He is popularly known as Pablo. Is it okay if I change the subject of the article to Kenneth Kimuli(Pablo)? Secondly, if one had put up their pictures on social media before and would prefer the picture to be put up on Wikipedia, does deleting the picture from the social media, e.g facebook, and using it on Wikipedia violate any copyrights?
Thanks
Mlajum ( talk) 14:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
I was wondering if you could explain how the article may not be sufficient for a Wikipedia page of its own? I'm at a bit of a loss as to how I can amend it.
Thank you MMcC321 ( talk) 15:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I am attempting to make a Wikipedia page for Ankura. Despite almost 10 citations to relevant materials regarding the company's creation, investments, acquisitions, and work, the article has been rejected. Many similar companies (i.e. Analysis Group, Cornerstone Research, etc. ) have less or similar cited materials in their articles.
Thus I would like to request help with the following: 1) Which of the citations listed in the article do not meet relevant criteria for reliability? I have reviewed the sections of Wikipedia's help page for reliability standards, but there is still some gray area on what can qualify. For instance, I have included a Bloomberg profile (having seen those used on several other articles!), but if that is not reliable I would still like to use the other source provided (an interview of the individual in question). 2) Given the nature of the article, I have added a few sources to some of the cited sections. Should I keep citations to one for each factoid, or are additional citations that demonstrate reliability better. 3) How many additional sources meeting the above criteria should be included? I did not want to over inundate the article page at first but if even more information is needed for approval then so be it. 3b) In the same way, are there sources I have listed that are considered not reliable that should be redacted all together? If so I am happy to remove them.
I appreciate any and all feedback on this manner. I am driven to make this happen!
Jwilson2032 ( talk) 16:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I created this page for Yiannis Papadopoulos it was declined 7 months ago. Since then I renewed all the sources and i updated the page quite a few times. Can someone please help me with this? I believe the article is in great standing, it's been seven months, at least please give me feedback regarding the page and if there's anything I can do to make it even better. This guy definitely deserves a Wiki page, he's won so many awards/ competition, he's touring around the world, and he's recognised and respected in the guitar community. Thank you for your time. Your help is greatly appreciated. Electra Roberts ( talk) 17:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Greetings. At a request from Whpq, I would like some help determining if my edits to the draft above are on the tright track. The original creator of the draft is Degacrowe9, but I made a few improvements to it. So, am I doing okay so far? Zanygenius( talk to me!)( email me!) 19:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
admin help}}
template.
Yunshui
雲
水
08:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I created this draft for a master planned community here in Nevada, Skye Canyon: /info/en/?search=Draft:Skye_Canyon,_Nevada
It seemed like the community warranted a Wikipedia article, since other master planned communities of similar size and significance also have articles ( /info/en/?search=Anthem,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Southern_Highlands,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Summerlin,_Nevada). In fact, Summerlin has 3 articles ( /info/en/?search=Summerlin,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Summerlin_South,_Nevada, /info/en/?search=Sun_City_Summerlin,_Nevada).
My draft has been declined many times, and is still not approved for the following reasons:
- This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
- This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
However, when reviewing the pages of the other master planned communities, their sources don't meet this criteria any better than those on my draft. Skye Canyon is a huge, prominent, albeit new community here in Nevada (6,500 homes). How else can I show that this is a legitimate, noteworthy entity?
Any help is much appreciated. Thank you!
TJRobertson ( talk) 19:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
To whom it may concern,
I created this Wikipedia page approximately 8 Week ago and was on a 8 Week waiting list which today has jumped to 4 months. I was wondering if there was an explanation for this or a priority system? An explanation for the jump from 8 Weeks to 4 Months is all I'm seeking unless you would like to review the Wikipedia Article itself.
Thanks, Brandon C.T. Lee
Shibby182 (
talk)
23:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)