Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 15 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 17 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I have references and citations but i don't know how to do it, i cllicked on links provided by wikipedia but it is too technical, editing is not my thing plus i want my article in an wikipedia manner not like an essay( the reason why it was declined), so i request you to research on my article, i have provided two links or you can google search it, there are sources, the subject "Baba Nagnath Yogeshwar" is worthy of wikipedia page but i am just too illiterate to edit and present it like wikipedia page, so please make the neccessary changes yourself and give consent to the draft, thank you.
117.228.101.79 ( talk) 06:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
I am asking for a re-view because it is my first time creating a page here on Wikipedia and would like to be guided on how exactly is a Wikipedia page supposed to look like.
Irie lwah ( talk) 08:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Well, I can concur with the inquirer a couple of days ago asking why one draft was taking days when others they'd submitted had only taken hours. My page Tomahawk Beach took less than an hour to approve and Allans Beach about thirty seconds. Draft:Smaills Beach is at six weeks and counting. Are reviewers watching the back end of the queue instead of the front?
That's not what I'm inquiring about, however. I've been watching how fast my draft has been crawling forward up the queue as older articles get dealt with. It's spent about two weeks now on the tenth page of submissions. At this rate I calculate it will be approaching six months old by the time it reaches the front. It may be over six months. It may, for that matter, be over six months without substantive edits from me, because I've about reached the point where I need other eyes on it before I have any changes to make. If I'm not much mistaken that would make it automatically a candidate for speedy deletion. Should I do dummy edits every couple of weeks or so to forestall this fate?
VeryRarelyStable ( talk) 09:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Sonu4200 (
talk)
15:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
103.139.9.69 (
talk)
18:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Trying to get this page up, but it seems with every submission there is an increasing amount of credits demanded, with zero specifics. When I'm told to put in more "secondary" sources, and I do, I'm told I still need more--like, how many more? I have 30 sources from newspapers, magazines, television and radio. Now I'm told I need a national or international award of some kind? How many? From where? If I had known a national or international award was required, it could have saved me a lot of time. Is this across the board, or just for singer/songwriters? Little help? No idea what a "tea house" is.
Barbabeau ( talk) 18:29, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
We substantially reworked the article and added more specific references. Bpurkaple ( talk) 19:24, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
@ CaptainEek:
While the topic is unique in primary care medicine, it is not a neologism to the field. It is a philosophy in the medical field that is prevalent so much so that at the North American Primary Care Research group had an entire half-day of the conference spent in discussion of this topic alone with an additional three other speakers discussing this topic in different presentations throughout the rest of the conference. It is in the same vein as person-centered care, which also has its own wikipedia page. Bpurkaple ( talk)
also rolling sky is a valid topic bc its a game i found and hasnt been writen about before so OTFTYT ( talk) 20:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
If I may know, why was my article not suitable for publishing? Bluest111 ( talk) 20:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
I have a very untidy External links reference * Paintings by William Oliver Williams at Art UK. On 30 October OxonAlex tidied a similar reference up by removing 2 spaces (it was something about getting everything on the same line). Could it be indicated precisely what was done to my original reference? The 2 versions look the same to me BFP1 ( talk) 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC) BFP1 ( talk) 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 15 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 17 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I have references and citations but i don't know how to do it, i cllicked on links provided by wikipedia but it is too technical, editing is not my thing plus i want my article in an wikipedia manner not like an essay( the reason why it was declined), so i request you to research on my article, i have provided two links or you can google search it, there are sources, the subject "Baba Nagnath Yogeshwar" is worthy of wikipedia page but i am just too illiterate to edit and present it like wikipedia page, so please make the neccessary changes yourself and give consent to the draft, thank you.
117.228.101.79 ( talk) 06:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
I am asking for a re-view because it is my first time creating a page here on Wikipedia and would like to be guided on how exactly is a Wikipedia page supposed to look like.
Irie lwah ( talk) 08:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Well, I can concur with the inquirer a couple of days ago asking why one draft was taking days when others they'd submitted had only taken hours. My page Tomahawk Beach took less than an hour to approve and Allans Beach about thirty seconds. Draft:Smaills Beach is at six weeks and counting. Are reviewers watching the back end of the queue instead of the front?
That's not what I'm inquiring about, however. I've been watching how fast my draft has been crawling forward up the queue as older articles get dealt with. It's spent about two weeks now on the tenth page of submissions. At this rate I calculate it will be approaching six months old by the time it reaches the front. It may be over six months. It may, for that matter, be over six months without substantive edits from me, because I've about reached the point where I need other eyes on it before I have any changes to make. If I'm not much mistaken that would make it automatically a candidate for speedy deletion. Should I do dummy edits every couple of weeks or so to forestall this fate?
VeryRarelyStable ( talk) 09:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Sonu4200 (
talk)
15:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
103.139.9.69 (
talk)
18:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Trying to get this page up, but it seems with every submission there is an increasing amount of credits demanded, with zero specifics. When I'm told to put in more "secondary" sources, and I do, I'm told I still need more--like, how many more? I have 30 sources from newspapers, magazines, television and radio. Now I'm told I need a national or international award of some kind? How many? From where? If I had known a national or international award was required, it could have saved me a lot of time. Is this across the board, or just for singer/songwriters? Little help? No idea what a "tea house" is.
Barbabeau ( talk) 18:29, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
We substantially reworked the article and added more specific references. Bpurkaple ( talk) 19:24, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
@ CaptainEek:
While the topic is unique in primary care medicine, it is not a neologism to the field. It is a philosophy in the medical field that is prevalent so much so that at the North American Primary Care Research group had an entire half-day of the conference spent in discussion of this topic alone with an additional three other speakers discussing this topic in different presentations throughout the rest of the conference. It is in the same vein as person-centered care, which also has its own wikipedia page. Bpurkaple ( talk)
also rolling sky is a valid topic bc its a game i found and hasnt been writen about before so OTFTYT ( talk) 20:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
If I may know, why was my article not suitable for publishing? Bluest111 ( talk) 20:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
I have a very untidy External links reference * Paintings by William Oliver Williams at Art UK. On 30 October OxonAlex tidied a similar reference up by removing 2 spaces (it was something about getting everything on the same line). Could it be indicated precisely what was done to my original reference? The 2 versions look the same to me BFP1 ( talk) 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC) BFP1 ( talk) 21:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)