Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< June 16 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 18 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Rishikesan T ( talk) 05:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC) Hi,
My wiki article got rejected with the reason 'do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject'. But the 4 references I have listed are all independent sources and carry necessary information about the subject. The first reference is from an article in Tugboat which is a journal published by TeX users group ( /info/en/?search=TUGboat). The second is another article that has been published in https://www.linuxtoday.com/. The third reference is a detailed interview of the subject that has been featured in January 2008 issue of TUG India by the TeX users group. (TeX users group is a community that is mentioned in /info/en/?search=TeX). The fourth is again an article from tug.org that has been retrieved from the internet archive. Based on these references, the article that has been submitted is true to the facts. So, I need some clarification on whether it is the way the references has been included that has resulted in the rejection. Considering the case, I request you to kindly look into the matter and provide your recommendations so that I can get my article published at the earliest. Rishikesan T ( talk) 05:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Keeps getting rejected due to lack of secondary sources, but how many do you need? The The Youth are published in a few sources that I have already listed. How many more do I need to list?
Swampcygnet ( talk) 07:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sounds of the Universe | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An EP listing on a music sales site |
Dummy | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Mostly a primary source interview where a participant talks about themselves, although there is one paragraph by the interviewer covering TTY |
PRS for Music Foundation | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A capsule history written by TTY |
Clash | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Doesn't mention TTY |
NTS | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Possibly some deep link contains significant coverage about TTY, but it appears to be just music by TTY |
Worldwide FM | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Primary source interview in which TTY members talk about TTY |
Total qualifying sources | 0 | There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements |
Hi I was wondering why my article got declined?
Elysium.Nguyen.aus ( talk) 08:06, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
Draft:AdoptOpenJDK was recently rejected for not being notable enough. I've spoken to @K.e.coffman who has suggested that I get a second opinion.
The project is backed by several notable companies including; IBM, Microsoft, GoDaddy and Pivotal (See https://adoptopenjdk.net/sponsors.html for the full list). AdoptOpenJDK is also referenced in several other Wikipedia articles ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?search=adoptopenjdk&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1). Thanks for taking the time to read this and please do let me know if there is any improvements I can make to the article to rectify the problem.
Gdams1 ( talk) 08:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Helloajnabi ( talk) 09:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Gindog ( talk) 11:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Chinnatty 11:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
How can I add the blue columns that say "films" and "television series" to my filmography table?
Britaylor77 ( talk) 12:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I understand that Wikipedia does not consider Allmusic.com and Discogs.com to be reliable sources. I'd love to be directed to sources that Wikipedia does consider reliable regarding people who work in the field of audio engineering. I'll note, in the meanwhile, that discogs.com enumerates 96 production credits for Mr. Walker and allmusic.com notes 29 credits. Also, the article begins with a citation from the New York Times. Many thanks Illbadler ( talk) 12:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Illbadler (
talk)
12:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Manishsinghon (
talk)
13:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I just created a draft. Wikipedia is suggesting that I move the draft to 'Draft Space'. Can you please tell me how to do it, and what does it mean? Falconite007 ( talk) 15:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Removed what I thought to be seen as "basically an ad" section (removed "partnerships"). The content of the article uses the same neutral language as the citations.
Tripledigitmail ( talk) 15:26, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi! This draft was rejected on grounds of insufficient notability. The subject has been the focus of extensive coverage in The Boston Globe, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, and Boston Business Journal. He is also credited in independent sources with having significant influence on modern fundraising models. In my opinion, Mr. Starr clears the bar set by
WP:BIO.
Additionally, the reviewer described the draft as a "fluff piece". I did not omit any negative information available in reliable sources, and I believe my wording is neutral. I also sought out input from editors who have worked on related topics, and Wikiuser100 made some updates to the draft prior to its review.
Would someone be up for taking a look and clarifying where there is room for improvement?
Please note, I have a conflict of interest: I work for a communications agency for which the Pan-Mass Challenge (of which Mr. Starr is founder) is a client. However, I never draft and submit an article on behalf of a client if I don't believe that the subject has encyclopedic value. If nothing else, I would really appreciate any feedback that can help me realign my expectations for my work in the future.
Thank you! Mary Gaulke ( talk) 20:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I have added a reference
Danielbush (
talk)
20:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< June 16 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 18 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Rishikesan T ( talk) 05:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC) Hi,
My wiki article got rejected with the reason 'do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject'. But the 4 references I have listed are all independent sources and carry necessary information about the subject. The first reference is from an article in Tugboat which is a journal published by TeX users group ( /info/en/?search=TUGboat). The second is another article that has been published in https://www.linuxtoday.com/. The third reference is a detailed interview of the subject that has been featured in January 2008 issue of TUG India by the TeX users group. (TeX users group is a community that is mentioned in /info/en/?search=TeX). The fourth is again an article from tug.org that has been retrieved from the internet archive. Based on these references, the article that has been submitted is true to the facts. So, I need some clarification on whether it is the way the references has been included that has resulted in the rejection. Considering the case, I request you to kindly look into the matter and provide your recommendations so that I can get my article published at the earliest. Rishikesan T ( talk) 05:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Keeps getting rejected due to lack of secondary sources, but how many do you need? The The Youth are published in a few sources that I have already listed. How many more do I need to list?
Swampcygnet ( talk) 07:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sounds of the Universe | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An EP listing on a music sales site |
Dummy | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Mostly a primary source interview where a participant talks about themselves, although there is one paragraph by the interviewer covering TTY |
PRS for Music Foundation | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A capsule history written by TTY |
Clash | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Doesn't mention TTY |
NTS | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Possibly some deep link contains significant coverage about TTY, but it appears to be just music by TTY |
Worldwide FM | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Primary source interview in which TTY members talk about TTY |
Total qualifying sources | 0 | There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements |
Hi I was wondering why my article got declined?
Elysium.Nguyen.aus ( talk) 08:06, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
Draft:AdoptOpenJDK was recently rejected for not being notable enough. I've spoken to @K.e.coffman who has suggested that I get a second opinion.
The project is backed by several notable companies including; IBM, Microsoft, GoDaddy and Pivotal (See https://adoptopenjdk.net/sponsors.html for the full list). AdoptOpenJDK is also referenced in several other Wikipedia articles ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?search=adoptopenjdk&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1). Thanks for taking the time to read this and please do let me know if there is any improvements I can make to the article to rectify the problem.
Gdams1 ( talk) 08:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Helloajnabi ( talk) 09:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Gindog ( talk) 11:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Chinnatty 11:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
How can I add the blue columns that say "films" and "television series" to my filmography table?
Britaylor77 ( talk) 12:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I understand that Wikipedia does not consider Allmusic.com and Discogs.com to be reliable sources. I'd love to be directed to sources that Wikipedia does consider reliable regarding people who work in the field of audio engineering. I'll note, in the meanwhile, that discogs.com enumerates 96 production credits for Mr. Walker and allmusic.com notes 29 credits. Also, the article begins with a citation from the New York Times. Many thanks Illbadler ( talk) 12:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Illbadler (
talk)
12:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Manishsinghon (
talk)
13:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I just created a draft. Wikipedia is suggesting that I move the draft to 'Draft Space'. Can you please tell me how to do it, and what does it mean? Falconite007 ( talk) 15:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Removed what I thought to be seen as "basically an ad" section (removed "partnerships"). The content of the article uses the same neutral language as the citations.
Tripledigitmail ( talk) 15:26, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi! This draft was rejected on grounds of insufficient notability. The subject has been the focus of extensive coverage in The Boston Globe, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, and Boston Business Journal. He is also credited in independent sources with having significant influence on modern fundraising models. In my opinion, Mr. Starr clears the bar set by
WP:BIO.
Additionally, the reviewer described the draft as a "fluff piece". I did not omit any negative information available in reliable sources, and I believe my wording is neutral. I also sought out input from editors who have worked on related topics, and Wikiuser100 made some updates to the draft prior to its review.
Would someone be up for taking a look and clarifying where there is room for improvement?
Please note, I have a conflict of interest: I work for a communications agency for which the Pan-Mass Challenge (of which Mr. Starr is founder) is a client. However, I never draft and submit an article on behalf of a client if I don't believe that the subject has encyclopedic value. If nothing else, I would really appreciate any feedback that can help me realign my expectations for my work in the future.
Thank you! Mary Gaulke ( talk) 20:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
I have added a reference
Danielbush (
talk)
20:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)