Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 6 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 8 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hi guys! Can anyone advise why was this page moved to Draft? Looks like the Reviewer (SamHolt6), advised that "the article is primary to WP:PRIMARY sources, and was declined by WP:AFC several times. Incubate." What does it mean Incubate? I see heaps of Web Frameworks approved even with less references, not sure what is the norm. One example: /info/en/?search=Bottle_(web_framework), has less references (5), so why double standards? Or this: /info/en/?search=Nagare_(web_framework), or: /info/en/?search=Webware_for_Python ???? Amassing. Not a single external reference for both! I do not understand this process, it's frustrating to say at least. I've collected 7 references, tried my best to present this info here, and did not receive any communication that the page was moved to Draft! Any communication at all. Nothing on Talk either, here is citation from /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Drafts" "As a matter of good practice the editor moving a page to draft should mark its talk page with the tags of any relevant projects as a means of soliciting improvements from interested editors." So what do I do now? Wait till December b/c someone decided that this is not good enough? And than another year if rejected again? Guys, if that is so, half of the Web Frameworks (free and Open source software) should be put back to Draft on the basis of notability. Like this I've mentioned above. Very disappointing for the first time Wikipedia contributor. You just lost me. Not worth my time, sorry. Gone surfing.... Platipusica ( talk) 06:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Really guys? So now the Reviewer (Theroadislong) is saying that "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia." And previously other Reviewers (StraussInTheHouse, Mjs1991) did not have any criticism on that note, but they requested more References, which I've clearly provided. Looks like some articles can be published with no References and notability what so ever.
Ok, I am with you. However, why no one advised me about this 6 months ago? How shall I write this in non advertising manner, which changes to implement if : other crap exists is not relevant at all? Thanks
Yabirkaur31 ( talk) 08:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
2409:4063:4E02:CBB:0:0:A7C8:6605 (
talk)
09:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Hope everything is fine with you. I have made every necessary changes to the article camping co but still there is issue with the notability of the subject as commented . I have attached two newspaper mentions as of now also few article mentions about the subject in various websites. Also i am in the search for more digital copies of news mentions. So it will be very helpful if you suggest and help me in publishing this article. As this will get a better educational visibility about such a venture idea which will eventually add values in the tourism sector of the northeast India
Thanks in advance with regards Krishanu Kribondhar ( talk) 11:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi i have draft an article oh Hemant Brijwasi, who was 2 times winner of Indian reality singing competition but still his article disapproved. i want to know the actual reason Karan Arora 12:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Zaara khan ( talk) 14:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I am writing an article about upcoming Telugu actress Zaara khan, I have mentioned her film name and its link, can you please tell me what is the exact reason, why it is declined.
Thanks in advance.
While adding an article about Allround Automations, it needs to be linked to page PL/SQL Developer, where slight information about Allround Automations is already mentioned but not in details. So when we visit PL/SQL Developer article on wikipedia, when someone want to refer about Allround Automations, it can be easily referred. Its just about putting the information, like we have for many companies in wikipedia. Manjeet.baranwal ( talk) 15:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I am trying to get some constructive feedback on this draft article. It was rejected by an editor on July 10 for "undefined." If I can get a review with some feedback, that would be super appreciated.
Jnthibeault (
talk)
16:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Need direction, if this is not acceptable, this is information found on the web link, I provided.
8aularodriguez ( talk) 20:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi my article didn't get approved because it didn't have enough references to make it notable.
Please can you advise me on how i can use the below links to verify notability?
https://themassifcentral.blog/2014/06/25/portrait-of-the-cycling-podcast/ https://www.rapha.cc/gb/en/stories/the-cycling-podcast-rapha https://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph-cycling-podcast/ https://www.pezcyclingnews.com/latestnews/pez-chat-richard-moore/ https://road.cc/content/review/239095-cycling-podcast-journey-through-cycling-year https://inrng.com/2018/07/tour-podcast-reviews/
In particular, this DCMS select committee report https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/366/36606.htm
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 6 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 8 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hi guys! Can anyone advise why was this page moved to Draft? Looks like the Reviewer (SamHolt6), advised that "the article is primary to WP:PRIMARY sources, and was declined by WP:AFC several times. Incubate." What does it mean Incubate? I see heaps of Web Frameworks approved even with less references, not sure what is the norm. One example: /info/en/?search=Bottle_(web_framework), has less references (5), so why double standards? Or this: /info/en/?search=Nagare_(web_framework), or: /info/en/?search=Webware_for_Python ???? Amassing. Not a single external reference for both! I do not understand this process, it's frustrating to say at least. I've collected 7 references, tried my best to present this info here, and did not receive any communication that the page was moved to Draft! Any communication at all. Nothing on Talk either, here is citation from /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Drafts" "As a matter of good practice the editor moving a page to draft should mark its talk page with the tags of any relevant projects as a means of soliciting improvements from interested editors." So what do I do now? Wait till December b/c someone decided that this is not good enough? And than another year if rejected again? Guys, if that is so, half of the Web Frameworks (free and Open source software) should be put back to Draft on the basis of notability. Like this I've mentioned above. Very disappointing for the first time Wikipedia contributor. You just lost me. Not worth my time, sorry. Gone surfing.... Platipusica ( talk) 06:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Really guys? So now the Reviewer (Theroadislong) is saying that "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia." And previously other Reviewers (StraussInTheHouse, Mjs1991) did not have any criticism on that note, but they requested more References, which I've clearly provided. Looks like some articles can be published with no References and notability what so ever.
Ok, I am with you. However, why no one advised me about this 6 months ago? How shall I write this in non advertising manner, which changes to implement if : other crap exists is not relevant at all? Thanks
Yabirkaur31 ( talk) 08:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
2409:4063:4E02:CBB:0:0:A7C8:6605 (
talk)
09:45, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Hope everything is fine with you. I have made every necessary changes to the article camping co but still there is issue with the notability of the subject as commented . I have attached two newspaper mentions as of now also few article mentions about the subject in various websites. Also i am in the search for more digital copies of news mentions. So it will be very helpful if you suggest and help me in publishing this article. As this will get a better educational visibility about such a venture idea which will eventually add values in the tourism sector of the northeast India
Thanks in advance with regards Krishanu Kribondhar ( talk) 11:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi i have draft an article oh Hemant Brijwasi, who was 2 times winner of Indian reality singing competition but still his article disapproved. i want to know the actual reason Karan Arora 12:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Zaara khan ( talk) 14:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I am writing an article about upcoming Telugu actress Zaara khan, I have mentioned her film name and its link, can you please tell me what is the exact reason, why it is declined.
Thanks in advance.
While adding an article about Allround Automations, it needs to be linked to page PL/SQL Developer, where slight information about Allround Automations is already mentioned but not in details. So when we visit PL/SQL Developer article on wikipedia, when someone want to refer about Allround Automations, it can be easily referred. Its just about putting the information, like we have for many companies in wikipedia. Manjeet.baranwal ( talk) 15:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I am trying to get some constructive feedback on this draft article. It was rejected by an editor on July 10 for "undefined." If I can get a review with some feedback, that would be super appreciated.
Jnthibeault (
talk)
16:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Need direction, if this is not acceptable, this is information found on the web link, I provided.
8aularodriguez ( talk) 20:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi my article didn't get approved because it didn't have enough references to make it notable.
Please can you advise me on how i can use the below links to verify notability?
https://themassifcentral.blog/2014/06/25/portrait-of-the-cycling-podcast/ https://www.rapha.cc/gb/en/stories/the-cycling-podcast-rapha https://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph-cycling-podcast/ https://www.pezcyclingnews.com/latestnews/pez-chat-richard-moore/ https://road.cc/content/review/239095-cycling-podcast-journey-through-cycling-year https://inrng.com/2018/07/tour-podcast-reviews/
In particular, this DCMS select committee report https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/366/36606.htm