Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 27 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 29 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hi hi
For the page of Jeffrey Feinman, any suggestion how i can improve the content and reference for passing the standard to be posted in Wikipedia?
Thanks a lot.
Jordi Scott ( talk) 03:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, can I ask for specific advice on this draft?
I think East Ventures is a notable topic. To my knowledge, all mentions are based on trusted and independent media coverage. Can you recheck the current draft and help point out which sources are still considered unreliable?
Will do my best to adhere to your feedback, which includes if I should remove/add certain sentences or information inside the draft. Thanks!
Jrkrist ( talk) 07:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi
I have been advised that - All the external links in the body of the article need to be removed, we don't use them. The primary sources need to be replaced with independent sources. For my article submission for EnviroVent, but I do not understand what this means and don't see how all links should be removed the article was created in a similar style to
/info/en/?search=Vent-Axia so what links did they use that I haven't, please?
Greatly appreciate your help.
Thank you!
Bethany m m ( talk) 08:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Where should the discussion on notability take place for a draft article?
Hi, is the talk page of a draft article the right place for the discussion on notability? If not, where is it? Thanks a lot. I have written a draft and I would appreciate feedback. Best Vasilis Theofylaktopoulos ( talk) 09:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Vasilis Theofylaktopoulos ( talk) 09:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I am creating a Wikipedia page for the first time and I am quite lost.
Thank you in advance
Leakordahi ( talk) 10:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
This article was rejected, but yet I've primarily modeled the article from a previously published article Summits on the Air, So, this is written in the same format/style as that article. That one was approved, and this one was rejected. I've provided more than enough references to make it WP:N. The primary goal of this article is to bring more awareness and recognition of State Parks, National parks, National Monuments, National Preserves, Wildlife Refuges, Wetland Management Districts, National Wild and Scenic Rivers Systems, Wildlife Management Areas, Antarctic Stations, National Military Parks, Historical Trails, and Amateur Radio. Aside from Amateur Radio, all the previously mentioned areas are places that ham radio operators can travel to and make contact with other ham radio operators (even at other designated locations such as these). Please reconsider and approve this article. Thanks for your time and consideration, Zul32 ( talk) 14:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I am requesting help in connection with the rejection of a draft (Abdülkadir Topkaç).
According to Theroadislong, the references “do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)”. My draft is a translation of a Turkish article. The original references, which I have retained, are articles devoted exclusively to Topkaç, published by CNN Türk (a Turkish version of CNN), Habertürk (a conservative newspaper), Cumhuriyet (a centre-left up-market newspaper), Sözcü (a Kemalist newspaper), and NTVMSNBC (a news channel).
According to Wikipedia guidelines, “News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact.” All news outlets cited in the Turkish article are well-established. All of them are secondary sources, and they are independent both of each other and of the subject (none of them can be assumed to have a vested interest in Topkaç).
I have also checked the guidelines on the notability of people: “People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.” Coverage seems significant to me on the basis of the original article’s references alone, and there are quite a number of reports in other media as well.
It seems to me that the references completely fulfil the requirements listed under “Common sourcing mistakes (notability)”: • “sources like mainstream newspaper articles, non-vanity books, established magazines, scholarly journals, television and radio documentaries, etc. – sources with editorial oversight and a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means generally not random personal websites, blogs, forum posts, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, self-published sources like open wikis (including other Wikipedia articles), etc.” • “secondary sources written by third parties to a topic that have no vested interest in the subject of their writing or coverage. This means generally not anything written by or on behalf of the subject or anyone connected with the person or organization in any way; not the subject's own website, not the subject's social media, not interviews (with the person, or of an organization's employees, officers or other insiders), and not press releases, regardless of where they are republished. An unconnected source is, for example, a newspaper reporter covering a story that they are not involved in except in their capacity as a reporter.” • “sources that treat a topic in detail”
The one reference that I have added myself is 140Journos (a crowdsourced news outlet). In contrast to the other sources, this is a primary source because the only person talking is Topkaç. I have added the reference because this is the only English-language text on Topkaç that I have been able to find (a film with English subtitles). Is this reference the problem? If not, what is? Any help would be appreciated. Emma1910 ( talk) 15:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
AnimationMonkey (
talk)
16:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I need help getting this page for Aaron Harmon approved. I've edited and revised the sources multiple times and I keep getting shot down. I'm confused because his work on multiple projects is stated on other Wikipedia pages citing he produced but it still is saying my sources aren't reliable? I'm just wondering how these other sites (i.e. blackbear ANONYMOUS) can be approved saying he is the producer and his own producer page is not accepted. I am feeling like I have no other ideas of how to get this page approved and would greatly appreciate any help here.. Thanks!
Emilythornberg ( talk) 16:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
94.69.230.41 (
talk)
21:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
It looks like this article was reviewed 10 days ago, but nothing happened. I am unable to discern the article's status. Can you?
Thanks
VicenteAssensio ( talk) 22:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 27 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 29 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hi hi
For the page of Jeffrey Feinman, any suggestion how i can improve the content and reference for passing the standard to be posted in Wikipedia?
Thanks a lot.
Jordi Scott ( talk) 03:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, can I ask for specific advice on this draft?
I think East Ventures is a notable topic. To my knowledge, all mentions are based on trusted and independent media coverage. Can you recheck the current draft and help point out which sources are still considered unreliable?
Will do my best to adhere to your feedback, which includes if I should remove/add certain sentences or information inside the draft. Thanks!
Jrkrist ( talk) 07:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi
I have been advised that - All the external links in the body of the article need to be removed, we don't use them. The primary sources need to be replaced with independent sources. For my article submission for EnviroVent, but I do not understand what this means and don't see how all links should be removed the article was created in a similar style to
/info/en/?search=Vent-Axia so what links did they use that I haven't, please?
Greatly appreciate your help.
Thank you!
Bethany m m ( talk) 08:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Where should the discussion on notability take place for a draft article?
Hi, is the talk page of a draft article the right place for the discussion on notability? If not, where is it? Thanks a lot. I have written a draft and I would appreciate feedback. Best Vasilis Theofylaktopoulos ( talk) 09:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Vasilis Theofylaktopoulos ( talk) 09:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I am creating a Wikipedia page for the first time and I am quite lost.
Thank you in advance
Leakordahi ( talk) 10:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
This article was rejected, but yet I've primarily modeled the article from a previously published article Summits on the Air, So, this is written in the same format/style as that article. That one was approved, and this one was rejected. I've provided more than enough references to make it WP:N. The primary goal of this article is to bring more awareness and recognition of State Parks, National parks, National Monuments, National Preserves, Wildlife Refuges, Wetland Management Districts, National Wild and Scenic Rivers Systems, Wildlife Management Areas, Antarctic Stations, National Military Parks, Historical Trails, and Amateur Radio. Aside from Amateur Radio, all the previously mentioned areas are places that ham radio operators can travel to and make contact with other ham radio operators (even at other designated locations such as these). Please reconsider and approve this article. Thanks for your time and consideration, Zul32 ( talk) 14:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I am requesting help in connection with the rejection of a draft (Abdülkadir Topkaç).
According to Theroadislong, the references “do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)”. My draft is a translation of a Turkish article. The original references, which I have retained, are articles devoted exclusively to Topkaç, published by CNN Türk (a Turkish version of CNN), Habertürk (a conservative newspaper), Cumhuriyet (a centre-left up-market newspaper), Sözcü (a Kemalist newspaper), and NTVMSNBC (a news channel).
According to Wikipedia guidelines, “News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact.” All news outlets cited in the Turkish article are well-established. All of them are secondary sources, and they are independent both of each other and of the subject (none of them can be assumed to have a vested interest in Topkaç).
I have also checked the guidelines on the notability of people: “People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.” Coverage seems significant to me on the basis of the original article’s references alone, and there are quite a number of reports in other media as well.
It seems to me that the references completely fulfil the requirements listed under “Common sourcing mistakes (notability)”: • “sources like mainstream newspaper articles, non-vanity books, established magazines, scholarly journals, television and radio documentaries, etc. – sources with editorial oversight and a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means generally not random personal websites, blogs, forum posts, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, self-published sources like open wikis (including other Wikipedia articles), etc.” • “secondary sources written by third parties to a topic that have no vested interest in the subject of their writing or coverage. This means generally not anything written by or on behalf of the subject or anyone connected with the person or organization in any way; not the subject's own website, not the subject's social media, not interviews (with the person, or of an organization's employees, officers or other insiders), and not press releases, regardless of where they are republished. An unconnected source is, for example, a newspaper reporter covering a story that they are not involved in except in their capacity as a reporter.” • “sources that treat a topic in detail”
The one reference that I have added myself is 140Journos (a crowdsourced news outlet). In contrast to the other sources, this is a primary source because the only person talking is Topkaç. I have added the reference because this is the only English-language text on Topkaç that I have been able to find (a film with English subtitles). Is this reference the problem? If not, what is? Any help would be appreciated. Emma1910 ( talk) 15:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
AnimationMonkey (
talk)
16:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I need help getting this page for Aaron Harmon approved. I've edited and revised the sources multiple times and I keep getting shot down. I'm confused because his work on multiple projects is stated on other Wikipedia pages citing he produced but it still is saying my sources aren't reliable? I'm just wondering how these other sites (i.e. blackbear ANONYMOUS) can be approved saying he is the producer and his own producer page is not accepted. I am feeling like I have no other ideas of how to get this page approved and would greatly appreciate any help here.. Thanks!
Emilythornberg ( talk) 16:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
94.69.230.41 (
talk)
21:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
It looks like this article was reviewed 10 days ago, but nothing happened. I am unable to discern the article's status. Can you?
Thanks
VicenteAssensio ( talk) 22:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)