Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< March 22 | << Feb | March | Apr >> | March 24 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Need to revert draft back to my sandbox for further editing (i.e. cancel submission for review). Please advise.
Rdev5 ( talk) 06:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Maria Grimana ( talk) 13:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
MAURIZIO PELLEGRIN page
Hello,
on March 10th NewYorkActuary gave me good advices on how to improve my page that was previously declined. I followed his/her advices. Can a reviewer let me know if she/he thinks that the page looks acceptable now? Is there anything else I should work on? thank you so much in advance for your help! all the best, Maria Grimana Maria Grimana ( talk) 13:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
16:22:07, 23 March 2017 review of submission by Larsonite
I am trying to figure out why my sources are not considered notable or trustworthy when I sited the largest most read publication in the technology world (engadget, techcrunch, PCmag, MacWorld. I also sited original (OEM) websites that are most credible for the devices and inventions mentioned on the article.
Thanks for the help.
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< March 22 | << Feb | March | Apr >> | March 24 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Need to revert draft back to my sandbox for further editing (i.e. cancel submission for review). Please advise.
Rdev5 ( talk) 06:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Maria Grimana ( talk) 13:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
MAURIZIO PELLEGRIN page
Hello,
on March 10th NewYorkActuary gave me good advices on how to improve my page that was previously declined. I followed his/her advices. Can a reviewer let me know if she/he thinks that the page looks acceptable now? Is there anything else I should work on? thank you so much in advance for your help! all the best, Maria Grimana Maria Grimana ( talk) 13:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
16:22:07, 23 March 2017 review of submission by Larsonite
I am trying to figure out why my sources are not considered notable or trustworthy when I sited the largest most read publication in the technology world (engadget, techcrunch, PCmag, MacWorld. I also sited original (OEM) websites that are most credible for the devices and inventions mentioned on the article.
Thanks for the help.