Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< January 4 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 6 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Help with notability
Hi @ SwisterTwister:;
I'm trying to update the article, and have consulted the Notability guidelines, as suggested. I am an independent developer - unrelated to the developer of Sage - who has worked with this library, and (perhaps obviously) feel that it is of note. It seems that there might be several potential issues, and I'm trying to figure out how to deal with them - first, there is the fact that all three referenced articles were authored by the same person, Mr. Bosch. This is true, but they are all peer-reviewed articles, two of which were developed in concert with existing customers, regarding existing commercial work, and all three were presented at simulation industry conferences. Second, it could be seen as an advertisement, but given that it is offered as open-source work, and that the notability page refers to "cleaning up" a page so it doesn't read like an advertisement. Might this be a reasonable avenue?
Before embarking on this effort, I read other pages for simulation and modeling class libraries in the open-source world, and the Ptolemy Project ( [1]) seemed to set a bar I could clear. Is there some element of Sage that I could describe, that might help it to become accepted on the same grounds as that of the Ptolemy Project?
Additionally, I've found other references to HighMAST (which became Sage, as the proposed article describes) which (refereed journal implications aside) may appear more independent, but are less informative, and less authoritative, than the ones listed. Would including one or more of those, help?
Please let me know what I might do to help make this article suitable for publication.
Regards, Ch rob ( talk) 14:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC) Ch rob ( talk) 02:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Ch rob ( talk) 15:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello! I am looking for assistance on how to improve the article I am creating on the Acorn Image Editor. I have based the general format of the article on comparable image editors that are listed under
/info/en/?search=Raster_graphics_editor such as
/info/en/?search=Pixelmator and
/info/en/?search=Affinity_Photo, but have so far received declinations based on notability and reading like an advertisement. I have increased the number of references to reliable and notable sources since the first draft. Many other image editor application pages list out the features of the application, so not sure if this is why it is deemed to be too much like an advertisement. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Artichokeflowers22 (
talk)
06:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
That helps a lot. Thanks so much!
Artichokeflowers22 ( talk) 00:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
My submission was declined.I wanted to know the reason for this. Nikitashah5 ( talk) 11:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Regarding the latest rejection of the dartf page, I would appreciate some clarification on notability criteria. Specifically, I would like to know why journalists's interviews with the company, published in major Lithuanian news portals, do not add to notability. I have found another example here: http://verslas.lrytas.lt/rinkos-pulsas/karine-technika-nato-pajegoms-gaminama-ir-kaune.htm Another article here, this time reporting about upcoming investors in Lithuanian market: http://ekonomika.tv3.lt/naujiena/keturi-uzsienio-investuotojai-i-lietuva-atnes-113-mln-litu-31261.html#ixzz2AJOWsdRq Both articles seem independent and noteworthy to me. Would they be appropriate to add, and if not, why not? Thanks! Zubzer0 ( talk) 11:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Samusaran (
talk)
13:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Why is the article that i made deleted, some of them wasn't copied
Hi, I want to post a photo on the link, Igor J. Koralnik, which was just posted. It is a photo supplied by Dr. Koralnik in an email. How do I do this? Can I supply the photo to someone to post. Regards,
Leigh Page ( talk) 15:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Leigh Page
Leigh Page ( talk) 15:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
We would like to have advice and assistance to improve Major reviews of the article.
Marika Hansen (
talk)
21:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi
I submitted "steady state (pharmacology)" because it did not excist as a page on it own in the English Wikipedia. It does have its own page in the Norwegian version, but that is linked to the whole subject of pharmacokinetics where steady state is mentioned. Tried to help and hope I did something right.
With the best of intentions
Andreas
Hjelpertil ( talk) 21:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Boxing_Bear_Brewing_Company
Hello, I've created an article page, but can't seem to find the correct tone and content to be approved by a Wikipedia reviewer. Is there any help or editing/finishing you could give me to get our article page to get approved? I noticed some other Wikipedia pages in our community with similar writing setup/styles/industry facts have been approved, so I'm a little confused as I think Boxing Bear has more information and award winning stories that would benefit an encyclopedia of knowledge for the beer industry. Especially, since a lot of it happened in 2016?
Some examples I was looking at: /info/en/?search=Bosque_Brewing_Company /info/en/?search=Marble_Brewery_(Albuquerque,_New_Mexico) /info/en/?search=Canteen_Brewhouse
Please help me, as I'm not the best formal writer, and I'm not sure how to edit my content to what you'd prefer.
Fosteryourself
Regarding the more general question of how the article should be written, the examples that you cited are not good examples to follow, because I suspect that, if ever they were nominated for deletion, they would not all survive that nomination. Instead, you should be striving to follow the examples of some of our better-quality articles on breweries, such as Boddingtons Brewery, John Smith's Brewery, Stones Brewery, Webster's Brewery or Worthington Brewery. Each of these will offer good examples of appropriate tone; they will also serve as templates for structuring the article and for assessing what type of material ought to be included (and vice versa).
Finally, I applaud your use of the {{ cite web}} template for formatting your footnotes. However, you don't seem to have quite developed the knack for correctly using its parameters. I modified one of the cites to the Alburquerque Journal to illustrate how these parameters should be used. Of course, similar corrections will be needed for the others.
I hope this response has been helpful. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 23:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< January 4 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 6 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Help with notability
Hi @ SwisterTwister:;
I'm trying to update the article, and have consulted the Notability guidelines, as suggested. I am an independent developer - unrelated to the developer of Sage - who has worked with this library, and (perhaps obviously) feel that it is of note. It seems that there might be several potential issues, and I'm trying to figure out how to deal with them - first, there is the fact that all three referenced articles were authored by the same person, Mr. Bosch. This is true, but they are all peer-reviewed articles, two of which were developed in concert with existing customers, regarding existing commercial work, and all three were presented at simulation industry conferences. Second, it could be seen as an advertisement, but given that it is offered as open-source work, and that the notability page refers to "cleaning up" a page so it doesn't read like an advertisement. Might this be a reasonable avenue?
Before embarking on this effort, I read other pages for simulation and modeling class libraries in the open-source world, and the Ptolemy Project ( [1]) seemed to set a bar I could clear. Is there some element of Sage that I could describe, that might help it to become accepted on the same grounds as that of the Ptolemy Project?
Additionally, I've found other references to HighMAST (which became Sage, as the proposed article describes) which (refereed journal implications aside) may appear more independent, but are less informative, and less authoritative, than the ones listed. Would including one or more of those, help?
Please let me know what I might do to help make this article suitable for publication.
Regards, Ch rob ( talk) 14:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC) Ch rob ( talk) 02:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Ch rob ( talk) 15:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello! I am looking for assistance on how to improve the article I am creating on the Acorn Image Editor. I have based the general format of the article on comparable image editors that are listed under
/info/en/?search=Raster_graphics_editor such as
/info/en/?search=Pixelmator and
/info/en/?search=Affinity_Photo, but have so far received declinations based on notability and reading like an advertisement. I have increased the number of references to reliable and notable sources since the first draft. Many other image editor application pages list out the features of the application, so not sure if this is why it is deemed to be too much like an advertisement. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Artichokeflowers22 (
talk)
06:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
That helps a lot. Thanks so much!
Artichokeflowers22 ( talk) 00:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
My submission was declined.I wanted to know the reason for this. Nikitashah5 ( talk) 11:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Regarding the latest rejection of the dartf page, I would appreciate some clarification on notability criteria. Specifically, I would like to know why journalists's interviews with the company, published in major Lithuanian news portals, do not add to notability. I have found another example here: http://verslas.lrytas.lt/rinkos-pulsas/karine-technika-nato-pajegoms-gaminama-ir-kaune.htm Another article here, this time reporting about upcoming investors in Lithuanian market: http://ekonomika.tv3.lt/naujiena/keturi-uzsienio-investuotojai-i-lietuva-atnes-113-mln-litu-31261.html#ixzz2AJOWsdRq Both articles seem independent and noteworthy to me. Would they be appropriate to add, and if not, why not? Thanks! Zubzer0 ( talk) 11:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Samusaran (
talk)
13:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Why is the article that i made deleted, some of them wasn't copied
Hi, I want to post a photo on the link, Igor J. Koralnik, which was just posted. It is a photo supplied by Dr. Koralnik in an email. How do I do this? Can I supply the photo to someone to post. Regards,
Leigh Page ( talk) 15:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Leigh Page
Leigh Page ( talk) 15:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
We would like to have advice and assistance to improve Major reviews of the article.
Marika Hansen (
talk)
21:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi
I submitted "steady state (pharmacology)" because it did not excist as a page on it own in the English Wikipedia. It does have its own page in the Norwegian version, but that is linked to the whole subject of pharmacokinetics where steady state is mentioned. Tried to help and hope I did something right.
With the best of intentions
Andreas
Hjelpertil ( talk) 21:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Boxing_Bear_Brewing_Company
Hello, I've created an article page, but can't seem to find the correct tone and content to be approved by a Wikipedia reviewer. Is there any help or editing/finishing you could give me to get our article page to get approved? I noticed some other Wikipedia pages in our community with similar writing setup/styles/industry facts have been approved, so I'm a little confused as I think Boxing Bear has more information and award winning stories that would benefit an encyclopedia of knowledge for the beer industry. Especially, since a lot of it happened in 2016?
Some examples I was looking at: /info/en/?search=Bosque_Brewing_Company /info/en/?search=Marble_Brewery_(Albuquerque,_New_Mexico) /info/en/?search=Canteen_Brewhouse
Please help me, as I'm not the best formal writer, and I'm not sure how to edit my content to what you'd prefer.
Fosteryourself
Regarding the more general question of how the article should be written, the examples that you cited are not good examples to follow, because I suspect that, if ever they were nominated for deletion, they would not all survive that nomination. Instead, you should be striving to follow the examples of some of our better-quality articles on breweries, such as Boddingtons Brewery, John Smith's Brewery, Stones Brewery, Webster's Brewery or Worthington Brewery. Each of these will offer good examples of appropriate tone; they will also serve as templates for structuring the article and for assessing what type of material ought to be included (and vice versa).
Finally, I applaud your use of the {{ cite web}} template for formatting your footnotes. However, you don't seem to have quite developed the knack for correctly using its parameters. I modified one of the cites to the Alburquerque Journal to illustrate how these parameters should be used. Of course, similar corrections will be needed for the others.
I hope this response has been helpful. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 23:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)