Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 1 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 3 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
RanjitBimrah (
talk)
03:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I need to know what is the problem with the article of Farhan Sarwar. I have published once but the article will be removed due to self-promotions and now i rewrite the complete article still i am unable to publish my article in the wiki. I need help what is issue occurring? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ak47hamza ( talk • contribs) 06:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the guidance. I have made changes according to your suggestions and add some verified sources. Kindly review it again. Let me know if i am still on the wrong track. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ak47hamza (
talk •
contribs)
08:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, it has been over a month now, can you please review the entry "Oak Felder" for approval? thanks again so much.
Jkerouacesq ( talk) 08:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
I can not in paragraphs and separate lines
Udumalai (
talk)
09:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I have created a draft for the company Applied Systems. As an employee of the company, I have stated my conflict of interest for transparency. I have also attempted to write the article in a factual, nonbiased, non-promotional way. Of the 40 references cited, approximately 10 are from the same company press release about awards our company won back in 2015. My draft was reviewed and has been declined as well as nominated for deletion. The reason provided was "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies." Without specifics, it is difficult for me to address the concerns. If someone here can provide guidance on how I can get this article added to Wikipedia, it is greatly appreciated. Please note: Three of the private equity firms that have owned or currently own our company have Wikipedia pages about them. Also, our major competitor has an existing page, although it was cited for the same violations the Applied Systems page I drafted. I don't understand why they have been allowed to publish a page with multiple issues and remain on Wikipedia: /info/en/?search=Vertafore. Thank you, Bennieandthejets ( talk) 14:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC) Bennieandthejets ( talk) 14:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm just looking for general comments at this stage. If the remaining sections are filled out to a similar standard as the current content, will it be likely to be accepted?
And about referencing, I'm concerned I've used a few too many references from the same sources (lots of THE), and a few primary sources. I do hope to be able to change some of them for more diverse sources, but should I make sure I do before submitting it for review, or is it passable as-is?
Macinn.es 15:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
My page (CoLAB Planning Series) was declined. I understood that the mod found some peacock terms and language that they didn't feel remained neutral. I went through the article and deleted/edited terms I felt could've been the culprits, and I have also added a new citation from a newspaper (another problem my page might've had). Would you mind going through the article and letting me know if I've fixed the peacock terms and remained in NPOV? Am I on my way to making the article better? If you find some peacock terms/ non-NPOV language, could you point them out to me? Your help will be much appreciated before I feel ready to resubmit. Thanks! VM510 ( talk) 18:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC) VM510 ( talk) 18:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Contest speedy deletion
Hello, I created a page, and it was rejected. I made significant edits in response to the feedback I received, and it was rejected again. It is meant to be wholly informational, not advertising. Where am I supposed to go from here?
/info/en/?search=Draft:NAVEX_Global
I was told to go to the page and click the button to contest deletion - but no button exists.
Mboxcar ( talk) 18:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
We are confused as to why reviewers our saying that our references do not show that our subject is notable, we would like some clarification on how to best fix this so that our page can get approved. Any suggestions would be helpful, we are just confused as to what we are missing. Paigedmckinney ( talk) 19:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 1 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 3 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
RanjitBimrah (
talk)
03:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I need to know what is the problem with the article of Farhan Sarwar. I have published once but the article will be removed due to self-promotions and now i rewrite the complete article still i am unable to publish my article in the wiki. I need help what is issue occurring? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ak47hamza ( talk • contribs) 06:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the guidance. I have made changes according to your suggestions and add some verified sources. Kindly review it again. Let me know if i am still on the wrong track. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ak47hamza (
talk •
contribs)
08:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, it has been over a month now, can you please review the entry "Oak Felder" for approval? thanks again so much.
Jkerouacesq ( talk) 08:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
I can not in paragraphs and separate lines
Udumalai (
talk)
09:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I have created a draft for the company Applied Systems. As an employee of the company, I have stated my conflict of interest for transparency. I have also attempted to write the article in a factual, nonbiased, non-promotional way. Of the 40 references cited, approximately 10 are from the same company press release about awards our company won back in 2015. My draft was reviewed and has been declined as well as nominated for deletion. The reason provided was "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies." Without specifics, it is difficult for me to address the concerns. If someone here can provide guidance on how I can get this article added to Wikipedia, it is greatly appreciated. Please note: Three of the private equity firms that have owned or currently own our company have Wikipedia pages about them. Also, our major competitor has an existing page, although it was cited for the same violations the Applied Systems page I drafted. I don't understand why they have been allowed to publish a page with multiple issues and remain on Wikipedia: /info/en/?search=Vertafore. Thank you, Bennieandthejets ( talk) 14:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC) Bennieandthejets ( talk) 14:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm just looking for general comments at this stage. If the remaining sections are filled out to a similar standard as the current content, will it be likely to be accepted?
And about referencing, I'm concerned I've used a few too many references from the same sources (lots of THE), and a few primary sources. I do hope to be able to change some of them for more diverse sources, but should I make sure I do before submitting it for review, or is it passable as-is?
Macinn.es 15:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
My page (CoLAB Planning Series) was declined. I understood that the mod found some peacock terms and language that they didn't feel remained neutral. I went through the article and deleted/edited terms I felt could've been the culprits, and I have also added a new citation from a newspaper (another problem my page might've had). Would you mind going through the article and letting me know if I've fixed the peacock terms and remained in NPOV? Am I on my way to making the article better? If you find some peacock terms/ non-NPOV language, could you point them out to me? Your help will be much appreciated before I feel ready to resubmit. Thanks! VM510 ( talk) 18:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC) VM510 ( talk) 18:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Contest speedy deletion
Hello, I created a page, and it was rejected. I made significant edits in response to the feedback I received, and it was rejected again. It is meant to be wholly informational, not advertising. Where am I supposed to go from here?
/info/en/?search=Draft:NAVEX_Global
I was told to go to the page and click the button to contest deletion - but no button exists.
Mboxcar ( talk) 18:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
We are confused as to why reviewers our saying that our references do not show that our subject is notable, we would like some clarification on how to best fix this so that our page can get approved. Any suggestions would be helpful, we are just confused as to what we are missing. Paigedmckinney ( talk) 19:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)