Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< March 18 | << Feb | March | Apr >> | March 20 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I've gotten three different variations of the same feedback--that the sources for this article are not adequate. However, the association being written about has been cited multiple times by the host country's main national newspaper, in several American university publications, and on a UNESCO webpage (which are in the list of references). If that's not enough, I'm not sure what other sources are acceptable when the point for the submission is that this subject is under-represented/covered in the first place. In the original draft, other information was included from the association's website, but that was called redundant or disallowed, and therefore got deleted despite it being the most authoritative source. Supplemental information was obtained from the association's founder but has not been published elsewhere. It is not made up and makes no far-fetched claims. A little support for this deserving association, please? Can you quantify how much more referencing is expected and at what level?
73.223.171.60 ( talk) 04:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Thitojhapali (
talk)
06:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
J,jhouse (
talk)
19:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
I have written a draft, Richard Beard(author), which I have submitted three times. It was rejected within a day the first two times (it was great to get such quick feedback. I submitted it a third time after lots of change, with all the problems, I think, fixed. However this was three weeks ago now, and it hasn't been reviewed, I was just wondering whether this was normal or if it may have been lost somehow.
Many Thanks! Teachamantoghoti ( talk) 21:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
105.112.42.211 (
talk)
21:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< March 18 | << Feb | March | Apr >> | March 20 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
I've gotten three different variations of the same feedback--that the sources for this article are not adequate. However, the association being written about has been cited multiple times by the host country's main national newspaper, in several American university publications, and on a UNESCO webpage (which are in the list of references). If that's not enough, I'm not sure what other sources are acceptable when the point for the submission is that this subject is under-represented/covered in the first place. In the original draft, other information was included from the association's website, but that was called redundant or disallowed, and therefore got deleted despite it being the most authoritative source. Supplemental information was obtained from the association's founder but has not been published elsewhere. It is not made up and makes no far-fetched claims. A little support for this deserving association, please? Can you quantify how much more referencing is expected and at what level?
73.223.171.60 ( talk) 04:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Thitojhapali (
talk)
06:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
J,jhouse (
talk)
19:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
I have written a draft, Richard Beard(author), which I have submitted three times. It was rejected within a day the first two times (it was great to get such quick feedback. I submitted it a third time after lots of change, with all the problems, I think, fixed. However this was three weeks ago now, and it hasn't been reviewed, I was just wondering whether this was normal or if it may have been lost somehow.
Many Thanks! Teachamantoghoti ( talk) 21:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
105.112.42.211 (
talk)
21:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)