Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 4 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 6 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hi there!!!! Im New to the Wikipedia world of creating articles, I am requesting assistance to improve my article of the "Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano" so that under the next article reviewing it will be approved and visible to Wikipedia when searched on the search engine. It's been a while now that the article was pending & waiting for re-review. I've already rechecked, improved & fixed all of the suggestions & comments you've sended to me a while ago to my talk page, since it was declined & leave some notes on my draft by the reviewer/s during my first submission. Being a draft, I know it is not perfect however, I am finding difficulty in understanding why it was not approved in the first place. It was written in a neutral tone and informative. Please help me improve the draft. Your help and assistance is highly & greatly appreciated. As soon as possible. I am looking forward to assist me & for your response.
Thanks.
Mystywave18 (
talk)
09:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Submission was delined on grounds of notability. However I believe that my subject should be considered notable for a range of different reasons. One of which is that I understand that he developed the " Woolmark" and I am trying to locate evidence on the web that backs this up. Before I spend too long can I have guidance as to whether this would make him "notable"?
Thanks Simontomp ( talk) 11:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
arlene francis didnt have cancer according to her son peter gabel
71.186.162.95 ( talk) 12:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I'd like to request a re-review of an article I've drafted on Amalgamated Holdings Limited. The major source for the article as it currently stands is an Annual Report that was filed with the Australian Stock Exchange. In other words, a document that had to be independently audited before submission to a highly-regulated third party. The article does not rely solely on the company's website. As for notability, a turnover of more than A$1 billion a year must surely go a long way towards meeting requirements for a stub-class article, at the very least. For the record, I'm not associated with Amalgamated Holdings in any way. I drafted this after seeing the company referred to in the
Event Cinemas and
Australian Theatres articles, and realising it did not have its own page. Thanks -
Meticulo (
talk)
12:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
How do I resubmit an article I have edited for reconsideration?
KKConnect (
talk)
14:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the draft will submit/resubmit it for review. --
Kethrus |
talk to me
14:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I've submitted a Wiki page on the American manufacturer Todd Shelton. I used as many supporting references from unbiased publications. I got a second rejection saying it reads too much like an ad. Hmmm. Can I get a little more detail abut what I'm doing wrong since almost all of the content came from a published source? Thanks for any guidance. D
Dylan22holland (
talk)
16:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
I am requesting a re-review because the reviewer pointed out that the article appears to be an advertisement. I do not know to which part of the article he is referring. If he means the article as a whole, I'm inclined to disagree. There is nothing listed that isn't factual and much of the article is backed up by very credible sources. In fact, because the band is in the same genre as The Prodigy, I used their Wiki page as a template guide on how to write a good article that is encyclopeadia worthy. I don't feel that this article is much different. I'd be grateful for feedback and advice as to how to improve the article so it fits in better with guidelines, as the examples I've compared with thus far (eg The Prodigy) don't seem any different.
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 4 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 6 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
Hi there!!!! Im New to the Wikipedia world of creating articles, I am requesting assistance to improve my article of the "Draft:Kenneth Earl Medrano" so that under the next article reviewing it will be approved and visible to Wikipedia when searched on the search engine. It's been a while now that the article was pending & waiting for re-review. I've already rechecked, improved & fixed all of the suggestions & comments you've sended to me a while ago to my talk page, since it was declined & leave some notes on my draft by the reviewer/s during my first submission. Being a draft, I know it is not perfect however, I am finding difficulty in understanding why it was not approved in the first place. It was written in a neutral tone and informative. Please help me improve the draft. Your help and assistance is highly & greatly appreciated. As soon as possible. I am looking forward to assist me & for your response.
Thanks.
Mystywave18 (
talk)
09:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Submission was delined on grounds of notability. However I believe that my subject should be considered notable for a range of different reasons. One of which is that I understand that he developed the " Woolmark" and I am trying to locate evidence on the web that backs this up. Before I spend too long can I have guidance as to whether this would make him "notable"?
Thanks Simontomp ( talk) 11:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
arlene francis didnt have cancer according to her son peter gabel
71.186.162.95 ( talk) 12:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I'd like to request a re-review of an article I've drafted on Amalgamated Holdings Limited. The major source for the article as it currently stands is an Annual Report that was filed with the Australian Stock Exchange. In other words, a document that had to be independently audited before submission to a highly-regulated third party. The article does not rely solely on the company's website. As for notability, a turnover of more than A$1 billion a year must surely go a long way towards meeting requirements for a stub-class article, at the very least. For the record, I'm not associated with Amalgamated Holdings in any way. I drafted this after seeing the company referred to in the
Event Cinemas and
Australian Theatres articles, and realising it did not have its own page. Thanks -
Meticulo (
talk)
12:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
How do I resubmit an article I have edited for reconsideration?
KKConnect (
talk)
14:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the draft will submit/resubmit it for review. --
Kethrus |
talk to me
14:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I've submitted a Wiki page on the American manufacturer Todd Shelton. I used as many supporting references from unbiased publications. I got a second rejection saying it reads too much like an ad. Hmmm. Can I get a little more detail abut what I'm doing wrong since almost all of the content came from a published source? Thanks for any guidance. D
Dylan22holland (
talk)
16:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
I am requesting a re-review because the reviewer pointed out that the article appears to be an advertisement. I do not know to which part of the article he is referring. If he means the article as a whole, I'm inclined to disagree. There is nothing listed that isn't factual and much of the article is backed up by very credible sources. In fact, because the band is in the same genre as The Prodigy, I used their Wiki page as a template guide on how to write a good article that is encyclopeadia worthy. I don't feel that this article is much different. I'd be grateful for feedback and advice as to how to improve the article so it fits in better with guidelines, as the examples I've compared with thus far (eg The Prodigy) don't seem any different.