Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 28 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 30 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
The reason for article rejection is said to be use of peacock terms and lack of independent verifiable sources. Per my understanding, all the sources are news source and that too, not a single but multiple sources. Also, the time span of coverage in news papers is quite wide i.e. it is not related to single year coverage.
Regarding peacock terms, it would be good if someone can point me what para/lines need to re-written to make it more neutral. All the coverage that I found has been highly appreciative and I tried to make it quite neutral. Gaidinliu ( talk) 07:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Gaidinliu ( talk) 07:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'd like to have another go at an article that has been rejected, but am really busy and won't be able to get to it for a while, as the changes suggested are quite complex. How long will the draft stay up so i can come back to it and add to it as advised by the reviewer? It was rejected in late February, and I won't time to get to it until at least June. (Sorry). Thanks so much.
Meltingwatch ( talk) 11:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I am trying to create a bio page for Peter Aiken and was recently informed that the information submitted is not notable. Can you please tell me what actually qualifies as notable? He is known worldwide in his field for data re-engineering and data management. Thank you.
Datablue12 ( talk) 12:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
This diff shows a very odd edit. I think, but am not sure, that I have rescued the page. Wiser heads than mine need to check. Fiddle Faddle 15:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
The article about Bukkehave was declined and deemed too much like an advertisement. I contend that it is no different that a wikipedia page for DHL, FedEx and other like those. Additonally, this is a company with a 90 year international history history that was one of the first Ford dealerships in Europe and then grew to a multinational company working with governments providing support to third world countries. This is not a company that sells to the public. Please let me know where we can make corrections.
Royalavenuemedia ( talk) 17:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I changed my username as it reflected an unintentional conflict of interest. Does this help or do you suggest any further improvements to the page? Ravin9976 ( talk) 18:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you advise on the wording to use for COI and where it should be placed on the talk page? I am unclear on this. Thanks. Ravin9976 ( talk) 15:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I am hoping you can help me with suggestions on how to make my article more notable or I fear it will be declined again. Thanks! Phyllis Rosser ( talk) 17:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 28 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 30 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
The reason for article rejection is said to be use of peacock terms and lack of independent verifiable sources. Per my understanding, all the sources are news source and that too, not a single but multiple sources. Also, the time span of coverage in news papers is quite wide i.e. it is not related to single year coverage.
Regarding peacock terms, it would be good if someone can point me what para/lines need to re-written to make it more neutral. All the coverage that I found has been highly appreciative and I tried to make it quite neutral. Gaidinliu ( talk) 07:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Gaidinliu ( talk) 07:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'd like to have another go at an article that has been rejected, but am really busy and won't be able to get to it for a while, as the changes suggested are quite complex. How long will the draft stay up so i can come back to it and add to it as advised by the reviewer? It was rejected in late February, and I won't time to get to it until at least June. (Sorry). Thanks so much.
Meltingwatch ( talk) 11:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I am trying to create a bio page for Peter Aiken and was recently informed that the information submitted is not notable. Can you please tell me what actually qualifies as notable? He is known worldwide in his field for data re-engineering and data management. Thank you.
Datablue12 ( talk) 12:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
This diff shows a very odd edit. I think, but am not sure, that I have rescued the page. Wiser heads than mine need to check. Fiddle Faddle 15:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
The article about Bukkehave was declined and deemed too much like an advertisement. I contend that it is no different that a wikipedia page for DHL, FedEx and other like those. Additonally, this is a company with a 90 year international history history that was one of the first Ford dealerships in Europe and then grew to a multinational company working with governments providing support to third world countries. This is not a company that sells to the public. Please let me know where we can make corrections.
Royalavenuemedia ( talk) 17:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I changed my username as it reflected an unintentional conflict of interest. Does this help or do you suggest any further improvements to the page? Ravin9976 ( talk) 18:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you advise on the wording to use for COI and where it should be placed on the talk page? I am unclear on this. Thanks. Ravin9976 ( talk) 15:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I am hoping you can help me with suggestions on how to make my article more notable or I fear it will be declined again. Thanks! Phyllis Rosser ( talk) 17:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)