This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Paul August☎ 03:12, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
The Chief name by itself gets only 3 Google hits; add the words white and feather (not even in quotes) and there are zero hits.
Paul Klenk
Delete or improve, the only hits bring up someone on the tribal council who was descended form Pawhuska. And his name means white hair not white feather so the name isnt correct in the first place.
Jobe6 08:53, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and Move to
Pawhuska.He has his own memorial
here.
shows Thishe is some what notable.
Jobe6 09:00, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Google
[1] seems to show that this chief is notable. (I don't think google counts should be a test for historical figures.)
Sdedeo19:22, 28 August 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
Paul August☎ 03:12, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
The Chief name by itself gets only 3 Google hits; add the words white and feather (not even in quotes) and there are zero hits.
Paul Klenk
Delete or improve, the only hits bring up someone on the tribal council who was descended form Pawhuska. And his name means white hair not white feather so the name isnt correct in the first place.
Jobe6 08:53, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and Move to
Pawhuska.He has his own memorial
here.
shows Thishe is some what notable.
Jobe6 09:00, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Google
[1] seems to show that this chief is notable. (I don't think google counts should be a test for historical figures.)
Sdedeo19:22, 28 August 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.