This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Fork of Persecution of non-Muslims to avoid get around VFD of that article. Author of the article is pushing an anti-Islam POV on numerous articles. ~~~~ 07:31, 20 July 2005 (UTC) User:-Ril- reply
This article is neutral, as manifested by the lack of POV complaints. -- Germen is not the only contributor to this article. When persecution of muslims is a legitimate article, why Religious persecution by muslims is not? Note that no objective reasons have been stated to delete this article. All attempts seem to focus on my supposed bad faith. -- Germen 12:19, 20 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Update: I have added a discussion [1]. -- Germen 13:02, 20 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Update: This VfD seems to be an attempt to support the RfC [2] complaint against me: one of the charges which are levelled against me is the "spurious" creation of articles. Note that it is not Wikipedia policy to forbid the creation of articles and that this article describes a real-world and proven phenomenon. Note that the ones who sponsor the VfD (like Ril and Axon) support a delete vote just for one reason: the supposed bad-faith of undersigned. The propable reason is my supposed anti-islam bias. -- Germen 08:48, 21 July 2005 (UTC) reply
-- Irishpunktom\ talk 10:16, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
21:13, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Fork of Persecution of non-Muslims to avoid get around VFD of that article. Author of the article is pushing an anti-Islam POV on numerous articles. ~~~~ 07:31, 20 July 2005 (UTC) User:-Ril- reply
This article is neutral, as manifested by the lack of POV complaints. -- Germen is not the only contributor to this article. When persecution of muslims is a legitimate article, why Religious persecution by muslims is not? Note that no objective reasons have been stated to delete this article. All attempts seem to focus on my supposed bad faith. -- Germen 12:19, 20 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Update: I have added a discussion [1]. -- Germen 13:02, 20 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Update: This VfD seems to be an attempt to support the RfC [2] complaint against me: one of the charges which are levelled against me is the "spurious" creation of articles. Note that it is not Wikipedia policy to forbid the creation of articles and that this article describes a real-world and proven phenomenon. Note that the ones who sponsor the VfD (like Ril and Axon) support a delete vote just for one reason: the supposed bad-faith of undersigned. The propable reason is my supposed anti-islam bias. -- Germen 08:48, 21 July 2005 (UTC) reply
-- Irishpunktom\ talk 10:16, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
21:13, 21 July 2005 (UTC)