This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP: 7k, 1d, 2 anons discounted. But copyvio portion removed. - Splash 02:59, 15 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete: unremarkable shops do not deserve an article. Badly written. Borderline vanity page. Not encyclopedic. Nova Cygni 14:25, 1 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP: 7k, 1d, 2 anons discounted. But copyvio portion removed. - Splash 02:59, 15 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete: unremarkable shops do not deserve an article. Badly written. Borderline vanity page. Not encyclopedic. Nova Cygni 14:25, 1 May 2005 (UTC) reply