Delete. This information should be merged to the appropriate articles given by Jiang
—
siroχo 20:12, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
This could just have been merged with those and a redirect made.
Morwen -
Talk 20:19, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Is the author of this article an attested psychic? I for one don't believe Wikipedia has forseeing the future as one of its functions.
Fire Star 20:36, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
A merge is not appropriate. The information is already duplicated. A redirect will be misleading - these are in some cases already "nations" or de facto sovereign states. It is not wikipedia's business to make predictions as the word "future" does. --
Jiang 21:07, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete: pure supposition, no fact. --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 22:03, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I hope it's just a case of someone accidentally creating a new article without knowing that its contents were already present under a more logically named entry. List of future lottery numbers is the article I'm holding out for.
Geogre 00:29, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The muse is coming over me now... OooooOOOoooOOOoohh... 2... 5... 16... 33... 42... 48... If you win you owe me a million bucks --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 10:42, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Cool! Drop me a line on my user page when that happens. In the meantime, delete this one as speculation. -
Lucky 6.9 05:18, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete - There is no reason for speculation
Gangulf 06:38, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. This information should be merged to the appropriate articles given by Jiang
—
siroχo 20:12, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
This could just have been merged with those and a redirect made.
Morwen -
Talk 20:19, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Is the author of this article an attested psychic? I for one don't believe Wikipedia has forseeing the future as one of its functions.
Fire Star 20:36, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
A merge is not appropriate. The information is already duplicated. A redirect will be misleading - these are in some cases already "nations" or de facto sovereign states. It is not wikipedia's business to make predictions as the word "future" does. --
Jiang 21:07, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete: pure supposition, no fact. --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 22:03, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I hope it's just a case of someone accidentally creating a new article without knowing that its contents were already present under a more logically named entry. List of future lottery numbers is the article I'm holding out for.
Geogre 00:29, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The muse is coming over me now... OooooOOOoooOOOoohh... 2... 5... 16... 33... 42... 48... If you win you owe me a million bucks --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 10:42, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Cool! Drop me a line on my user page when that happens. In the meantime, delete this one as speculation. -
Lucky 6.9 05:18, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete - There is no reason for speculation
Gangulf 06:38, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)