More fun with the VR crowd from Iowa State. Already suggested for deletion, so let's make it official, friends. -
Lucky 6.9 02:46, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I'm sure the author meant well. There's no pagerank puffing or anything, but not notable.
Geogre 03:40, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
If it can be added to or cleaned some by the end of the voting period, I will change my vote. Not against the project, but this article doesn't give enough.
Geogre 02:00, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete: hasn't this been voted on and deleted from here once before? --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 09:03, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
For information, yes it was but should not (IMO) warrant speedy deletion this time round. See
Template:VfD-C6org. --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 13:38, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Keep, no need to remove C6 completely from Wikipedia. --
Ben Brockert 21:49, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
It is not that bad. As far as I can tell, it seems to describe a pretty serious, four-years old project, or am I missing something? I vote to keep it. --
Alexandre 00:01, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Academic projects are a dime a dozen. Very important to the participants, I'm sure; no evidence this one matters to anyone else.
Wile E. Heresiarch 13:34, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
More fun with the VR crowd from Iowa State. Already suggested for deletion, so let's make it official, friends. -
Lucky 6.9 02:46, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I'm sure the author meant well. There's no pagerank puffing or anything, but not notable.
Geogre 03:40, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
If it can be added to or cleaned some by the end of the voting period, I will change my vote. Not against the project, but this article doesn't give enough.
Geogre 02:00, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete: hasn't this been voted on and deleted from here once before? --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 09:03, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
For information, yes it was but should not (IMO) warrant speedy deletion this time round. See
Template:VfD-C6org. --
Graham ☺ |
Talk 13:38, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Keep, no need to remove C6 completely from Wikipedia. --
Ben Brockert 21:49, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
It is not that bad. As far as I can tell, it seems to describe a pretty serious, four-years old project, or am I missing something? I vote to keep it. --
Alexandre 00:01, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Academic projects are a dime a dozen. Very important to the participants, I'm sure; no evidence this one matters to anyone else.
Wile E. Heresiarch 13:34, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)