This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept -
SimonP 01:19, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
bad english, wrong category, simple view on something that isn't, wrong title, explanation wrong, nothing links to it. Biot 19:13, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. It needs cleanup, not deletion. It is a valid topic for an article, it just needs improved slightly. Perhaps some stuff could be pulled from the main
Internet page which would help to reduce its horrendous size --
Cynical 19:33, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Weak Keep. If there was some other article that linked to it or if the article got cleaned up and expanded, then I'd say keep it for sure. The article in its present form isn't worth keeping, but since it's on the wikipedia a year from now it'll probably be a featured article :) -Cookiemobsta
I just noticed that there's an article called "Bandwidth throttling" (note the difference in capitalization), which is actually quite good. I should have spotted this before VfD'ing this page, and just redirected it instead; it's the obvious thing to do. I've gone ahead and done it. Sorry about the mess. - Biot 08:34, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept -
SimonP 01:19, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
bad english, wrong category, simple view on something that isn't, wrong title, explanation wrong, nothing links to it. Biot 19:13, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. It needs cleanup, not deletion. It is a valid topic for an article, it just needs improved slightly. Perhaps some stuff could be pulled from the main
Internet page which would help to reduce its horrendous size --
Cynical 19:33, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
reply
Weak Keep. If there was some other article that linked to it or if the article got cleaned up and expanded, then I'd say keep it for sure. The article in its present form isn't worth keeping, but since it's on the wikipedia a year from now it'll probably be a featured article :) -Cookiemobsta
I just noticed that there's an article called "Bandwidth throttling" (note the difference in capitalization), which is actually quite good. I should have spotted this before VfD'ing this page, and just redirected it instead; it's the obvious thing to do. I've gone ahead and done it. Sorry about the mess. - Biot 08:34, May 17, 2005 (UTC)