This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
page appears to have been created by a one-time user about themselves, with no evident claims to notability. Material is more appropriate for a User page. Text also includes substantial advertorial content for a publication supposedly produced by this person. It's been flagged as PotentialVanity for about 2 weeks, the user has not added anything else in that time, so probably time to delete this.
cjllw |
TALK 06:02, 2005 August 3 (UTC)
Comment: This looks like a copyvio (I did a quick Google check, but no luck there), unless it's an ad and posted with permission. --
MarkSweep 06:12, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete. Potential copyvio and magazine is yet to issue a single copy. No indication whether it will reach notability guidelines if and when it is published so its editor/publisher is not yet notable.
Capitalistroadster 06:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not notable, as the magazine has not even been published yet.
Thue |
talk 08:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete, vanity. --
Merovingian(t)(c) 12:07, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Delete not speedy, as vanity/advertising --
Henrygb 14:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete vanity/ad. --
Etacar11 01:53, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
page appears to have been created by a one-time user about themselves, with no evident claims to notability. Material is more appropriate for a User page. Text also includes substantial advertorial content for a publication supposedly produced by this person. It's been flagged as PotentialVanity for about 2 weeks, the user has not added anything else in that time, so probably time to delete this.
cjllw |
TALK 06:02, 2005 August 3 (UTC)
Comment: This looks like a copyvio (I did a quick Google check, but no luck there), unless it's an ad and posted with permission. --
MarkSweep 06:12, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete. Potential copyvio and magazine is yet to issue a single copy. No indication whether it will reach notability guidelines if and when it is published so its editor/publisher is not yet notable.
Capitalistroadster 06:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not notable, as the magazine has not even been published yet.
Thue |
talk 08:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete, vanity. --
Merovingian(t)(c) 12:07, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Delete not speedy, as vanity/advertising --
Henrygb 14:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Delete vanity/ad. --
Etacar11 01:53, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.