The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
WikiProject Medicine is fairly active, so we may have a little bit of time to get the articles fixed. How about asking them?
Titoxd(
?!?) 00:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)reply
No way! It is the problem of
WikiProject Medical Genetics. We started to work one week ago, and we're active. Anyway, Medicine wikiproject is not active. How many active participants we have? Have a look at the history of medicine project page. :) I'll fix these, just give me some days.
NCursework 06:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Hmm... so should we pass these now or wait instead?
Titoxd(
?!?) 05:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Currently I'm on wikiholiday. And I can't fix all of these articles now. But the Medical WikiProject is active and works hard. So for the end of august, every article will be ready.
NCursework 07:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Currently, I recommend setting the list aside for now, bringing it back out when the Project feels the articles are ready. If nothing else so that the later versions get in instead of the current ones.
Nifboy 06:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)reply
With tear on my face I must say ok. :( We will work harder...
NCursework 08:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)reply
I updated the list. It seems that all articles are A-B or FA-class.
NCursework 15:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)reply
I just looked over these - sorry I didn't see your update note earlier. I would have classified Albinism and Color blindness as only B-Class based on references, but the Downs article is now FA. While accepting that the first two and most of the Bs are poorly referenced, I think the articles are all of usable quality. The topics are nearly all fairly important disorders, Downs particularly so IMHO. Therefore I would be OK with including the list as is.
Walkerma 02:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)reply
I think we could add in the first and last of these, they are both very nice articles, but the middle two look to be poor Bs and they don't have the importance of something like Down syndrome.
Proposal based on the above, listed by
Walkerma 04:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Include:
Albinism - A-class (but criticised as "poorly sourced")
Color blindness - A-class (but criticised as "poorly sourced")
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
WikiProject Medicine is fairly active, so we may have a little bit of time to get the articles fixed. How about asking them?
Titoxd(
?!?) 00:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)reply
No way! It is the problem of
WikiProject Medical Genetics. We started to work one week ago, and we're active. Anyway, Medicine wikiproject is not active. How many active participants we have? Have a look at the history of medicine project page. :) I'll fix these, just give me some days.
NCursework 06:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Hmm... so should we pass these now or wait instead?
Titoxd(
?!?) 05:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Currently I'm on wikiholiday. And I can't fix all of these articles now. But the Medical WikiProject is active and works hard. So for the end of august, every article will be ready.
NCursework 07:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Currently, I recommend setting the list aside for now, bringing it back out when the Project feels the articles are ready. If nothing else so that the later versions get in instead of the current ones.
Nifboy 06:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)reply
With tear on my face I must say ok. :( We will work harder...
NCursework 08:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)reply
I updated the list. It seems that all articles are A-B or FA-class.
NCursework 15:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)reply
I just looked over these - sorry I didn't see your update note earlier. I would have classified Albinism and Color blindness as only B-Class based on references, but the Downs article is now FA. While accepting that the first two and most of the Bs are poorly referenced, I think the articles are all of usable quality. The topics are nearly all fairly important disorders, Downs particularly so IMHO. Therefore I would be OK with including the list as is.
Walkerma 02:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)reply
I think we could add in the first and last of these, they are both very nice articles, but the middle two look to be poor Bs and they don't have the importance of something like Down syndrome.
Proposal based on the above, listed by
Walkerma 04:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Include:
Albinism - A-class (but criticised as "poorly sourced")
Color blindness - A-class (but criticised as "poorly sourced")
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.