![]() |
Wikipedia 1.0 — (
talk) FAQ — To do |
---|
Release version tools Guide — (talk) — (stats) |
Article selection process (talk) Version 0.8 bot selection Version 0.8 feedback |
IRC channel ( IRC) |
|
Release criteria |
Review team ( FAQ) |
Version 0.8 release (manual selection) (t) |
"Selection" project (
Talk) |
|
CORE TOPICS CORE SUPPLEMENT Core topics - 1,000 ( Talk) ( COTF) (bot) |
TORRENT ( Talk) |
"Selection" project for kids ( (t)) |
WORK VIA WIKI PROJECTS ( talk) |
Pushing to 1.0 ( talk) |
|
Static content subcom. |
Here, we determine which groups or sets of entries will be eligible for Version 0.5. A set may consist of a group of interrelated topics (such as Proton, Neutron, and Electron), or a major topic and its various subarticles (such as Canada and History of Canada). These entries will be chosen based on overall importance, quality and stability.
Any article may be nominated to be part of a set, but sets are generally expected to have at least one article eligible for individual nomination for Version 0.5 under the release criteria. The rest of the set would be considered part of the "completeness" clause of the release criteria. For the sake of completeness, articles that have already been accepted may be re-nominated as part of a different set: Please note this in your nominations.
The initially nominated list does not necessarily have to resemble the finally passed list. Anyone may request that articles be added or removed from the list; with general consensus (or consent of the nominator) the article may be freely added or removed. Otherwise, users may support or oppose the nomination as with any other procedure.
Once discussion has generated a consensus, a member of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team may close the nomination after discussion has died down, either passing it (by moving the set and its contents to Wikipedia:Version 0.5, passing them as if they were nominated individually), or failing it. Either way, all discussions will be archived.
Once a set has passed, articles can be added to it through the individual article nomination process.
The result of the debate was include all but Marfan syndrome and Von Willebrand disease. Tito xd( ?!?) 02:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
These are important articles, the most common genetic disorders. WikiProject Medical Genetics works on these. NCurse work 06:20, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
We'd also include:
NCurse work 07:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Proposal based on the above, listed by Walkerma 04:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Consensus:
This is the original proposal; for the revised proposal see the list below.
Seems to be a set to include because political aspects are in minority in the release. Lincher 15:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Revised list
Discussion on revised list Bearing in mind that some of these are philosophical and some are political, I think we can include all 16 of the revised list. Alex, one reason that the list was offered here was to try to restore balance, because these areas are under-represented at present. Also, my experience here at V0.5 is that getting a nice body of related articles like this on important topics is very valuable; if you end up with (say) capitalism but not socialism it severely weakens the listing. So I propose we keep all 16. Walkerma 04:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Underpopulated section, hope some of these articles can be added to the project. Lincher 16:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
OK, let's include all of the original list, plus Kirill's list, and also Roman mythology and Apollo. I'll add these on Friday barring any objections. Walkerma 04:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikipedia 1.0 — (
talk) FAQ — To do |
---|
Release version tools Guide — (talk) — (stats) |
Article selection process (talk) Version 0.8 bot selection Version 0.8 feedback |
IRC channel ( IRC) |
|
Release criteria |
Review team ( FAQ) |
Version 0.8 release (manual selection) (t) |
"Selection" project (
Talk) |
|
CORE TOPICS CORE SUPPLEMENT Core topics - 1,000 ( Talk) ( COTF) (bot) |
TORRENT ( Talk) |
"Selection" project for kids ( (t)) |
WORK VIA WIKI PROJECTS ( talk) |
Pushing to 1.0 ( talk) |
|
Static content subcom. |
Here, we determine which groups or sets of entries will be eligible for Version 0.5. A set may consist of a group of interrelated topics (such as Proton, Neutron, and Electron), or a major topic and its various subarticles (such as Canada and History of Canada). These entries will be chosen based on overall importance, quality and stability.
Any article may be nominated to be part of a set, but sets are generally expected to have at least one article eligible for individual nomination for Version 0.5 under the release criteria. The rest of the set would be considered part of the "completeness" clause of the release criteria. For the sake of completeness, articles that have already been accepted may be re-nominated as part of a different set: Please note this in your nominations.
The initially nominated list does not necessarily have to resemble the finally passed list. Anyone may request that articles be added or removed from the list; with general consensus (or consent of the nominator) the article may be freely added or removed. Otherwise, users may support or oppose the nomination as with any other procedure.
Once discussion has generated a consensus, a member of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team may close the nomination after discussion has died down, either passing it (by moving the set and its contents to Wikipedia:Version 0.5, passing them as if they were nominated individually), or failing it. Either way, all discussions will be archived.
Once a set has passed, articles can be added to it through the individual article nomination process.
The result of the debate was include all but Marfan syndrome and Von Willebrand disease. Tito xd( ?!?) 02:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
These are important articles, the most common genetic disorders. WikiProject Medical Genetics works on these. NCurse work 06:20, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
We'd also include:
NCurse work 07:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Proposal based on the above, listed by Walkerma 04:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Consensus:
This is the original proposal; for the revised proposal see the list below.
Seems to be a set to include because political aspects are in minority in the release. Lincher 15:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Revised list
Discussion on revised list Bearing in mind that some of these are philosophical and some are political, I think we can include all 16 of the revised list. Alex, one reason that the list was offered here was to try to restore balance, because these areas are under-represented at present. Also, my experience here at V0.5 is that getting a nice body of related articles like this on important topics is very valuable; if you end up with (say) capitalism but not socialism it severely weakens the listing. So I propose we keep all 16. Walkerma 04:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Underpopulated section, hope some of these articles can be added to the project. Lincher 16:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
OK, let's include all of the original list, plus Kirill's list, and also Roman mythology and Apollo. I'll add these on Friday barring any objections. Walkerma 04:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)