Support as nominator --wadester16 17:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Support quite impressive. --candle•wicke 03:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Support per nom, but shouldn't it have been closed at FPC before being nommed here? I don't believe an image should have active noms in both places at once. --
jjron (
talk) 06:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry, it was a clear failure at FPC and I nom'ed it after its 7 days open + 2 of inactivity, so it was only awaiting the closing process. wadester16 16:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
True enough, but I never like these awkward precedents ;-). --
jjron (
talk) 08:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Support as nominator --wadester16 17:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Support quite impressive. --candle•wicke 03:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Support per nom, but shouldn't it have been closed at FPC before being nommed here? I don't believe an image should have active noms in both places at once. --
jjron (
talk) 06:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Sorry, it was a clear failure at FPC and I nom'ed it after its 7 days open + 2 of inactivity, so it was only awaiting the closing process. wadester16 16:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)reply
True enough, but I never like these awkward precedents ;-). --
jjron (
talk) 08:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)reply