From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Defunct club. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 21:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Canadian Premier League table templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I have preserved the history for 2021 and 2022 in the 2021 Canadian Premier League and 2022 Canadian Premier League redirects as suggested/questioned by Blaixx, RedBlueGreen93, and CRwikiCA. If the history of any others are wanted, just let me know. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Changed to tables embedded in articles, see earlier discussion for rationale. There is no need to retain the templates themselves. CRwikiCA  talk 21:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

It would be a shame to lose the history of these templates. I do find it useful to see how the template looked on a given date. BLAIXX 21:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • delete, but if someone wants to keep the history in user or project space, I see no problem with that. Frietjes ( talk) 23:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – Some of the 2022 club season articles are not complete. The 2022 template at least should remain until those articles are completed. That way the history about where a team stood on different matchdays is not deleted until it has been added elsewhere. RedBlueGreen93 ( talk) 19:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
Frietjes Can you advise how to best move to user or project space? CRwikiCA  talk 20:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
@ RedBlueGreen93 and Blaixx: See WP:USERFY about a guide to move this to user space if you need that to create/update the season articles. CRwikiCA  talk 14:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply
yes, if this closes as delete, you should be able to get the closing admin to move the history to user or project space. Frietjes ( talk) 20:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The club withdrew from the league. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 21:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The club is defunct from 2020. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 20:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

unused, appears to be effectively replaced by Template:Births and deaths by year for decade Frietjes ( talk) 20:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

An empty template, so useless. Team seems to play in 3rd level, so I imagine not very useful if it'd be up to date. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 20:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

not transcluded by any articles, or linked from any articles, seems like it has been replaced by something else Frietjes ( talk) 18:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Usages of this template should be replaced with the general Template:Infobox venue as this template doesn't really offer anything that the general one doesn't have. Additionally, it would seem that usages of this template are just misused (see York Park) or just offer no added value (see Hong Kong Cricket Club). Gonnym ( talk) 16:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Cricket grounds are typically a different kettle of fish to other sporting grounds, and this template is more relevant to them than the one being proposed. Either way, if it is deleted, the current Template:Infobox venue would need to have things like end names added to it, or provisions for Test/ODI/T20I first and last matches held. In my view, the infobox isn't misused in cricket articles for the most part. One or two examples of misuse are far outweighed by correct use, in probably 99% of cricket articles where it is used. StickyWicket ( talk) 17:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as per SW, the cricket ground infobox has multiple specific parameters that aren't useful to mpst general venues. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 20:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Per the comments of StickyWicket and Joseph2302. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 10:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The ability of first/last matches for each type, End names (referred commonly during television productions etc, are all interesting information). Cricket grounds are also quite quirky with multiple generations of building etc. and ends play a big part. I see no reason to delete them. The instanes of misuse potentially would have happened, wven with generic ground template. Beast01998 ( talk) 09:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Not needed, it's a pointless switch template between articles. These points tables are used on 2014 T20 Blast and 2015 T20 Blast and can be accessed between each other via those pages. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Made up topic. Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 01:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Defunct club. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 21:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Canadian Premier League table templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I have preserved the history for 2021 and 2022 in the 2021 Canadian Premier League and 2022 Canadian Premier League redirects as suggested/questioned by Blaixx, RedBlueGreen93, and CRwikiCA. If the history of any others are wanted, just let me know. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Changed to tables embedded in articles, see earlier discussion for rationale. There is no need to retain the templates themselves. CRwikiCA  talk 21:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

It would be a shame to lose the history of these templates. I do find it useful to see how the template looked on a given date. BLAIXX 21:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • delete, but if someone wants to keep the history in user or project space, I see no problem with that. Frietjes ( talk) 23:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – Some of the 2022 club season articles are not complete. The 2022 template at least should remain until those articles are completed. That way the history about where a team stood on different matchdays is not deleted until it has been added elsewhere. RedBlueGreen93 ( talk) 19:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
Frietjes Can you advise how to best move to user or project space? CRwikiCA  talk 20:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
@ RedBlueGreen93 and Blaixx: See WP:USERFY about a guide to move this to user space if you need that to create/update the season articles. CRwikiCA  talk 14:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply
yes, if this closes as delete, you should be able to get the closing admin to move the history to user or project space. Frietjes ( talk) 20:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The club withdrew from the league. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 21:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The club is defunct from 2020. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 20:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

unused, appears to be effectively replaced by Template:Births and deaths by year for decade Frietjes ( talk) 20:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

An empty template, so useless. Team seems to play in 3rd level, so I imagine not very useful if it'd be up to date. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 20:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

not transcluded by any articles, or linked from any articles, seems like it has been replaced by something else Frietjes ( talk) 18:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Usages of this template should be replaced with the general Template:Infobox venue as this template doesn't really offer anything that the general one doesn't have. Additionally, it would seem that usages of this template are just misused (see York Park) or just offer no added value (see Hong Kong Cricket Club). Gonnym ( talk) 16:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Cricket grounds are typically a different kettle of fish to other sporting grounds, and this template is more relevant to them than the one being proposed. Either way, if it is deleted, the current Template:Infobox venue would need to have things like end names added to it, or provisions for Test/ODI/T20I first and last matches held. In my view, the infobox isn't misused in cricket articles for the most part. One or two examples of misuse are far outweighed by correct use, in probably 99% of cricket articles where it is used. StickyWicket ( talk) 17:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as per SW, the cricket ground infobox has multiple specific parameters that aren't useful to mpst general venues. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 20:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Per the comments of StickyWicket and Joseph2302. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 10:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The ability of first/last matches for each type, End names (referred commonly during television productions etc, are all interesting information). Cricket grounds are also quite quirky with multiple generations of building etc. and ends play a big part. I see no reason to delete them. The instanes of misuse potentially would have happened, wven with generic ground template. Beast01998 ( talk) 09:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Not needed, it's a pointless switch template between articles. These points tables are used on 2014 T20 Blast and 2015 T20 Blast and can be accessed between each other via those pages. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Made up topic. Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 01:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook