From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 30. plicit 23:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Manchester Metrolink Frietjes ( talk) 17:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Now in use, but feel free to renominate if you still think it should be deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Appears to be article content, but it is not used in any articles. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 16:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Nonsense DR, it will be added to articles once final specifications are out in 1-2 weeks, will be similar to use of the previous template -- Denniss ( talk) 18:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Denniss is right, it is not like everything gets perfect in the first revision. Erkin Alp Güney 11:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Hence my opinion is, oppose. Erkin Alp Güney 21:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 09:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Many details will (hopefully) be released today so then we'll be able to update it and transclude to article. -- Denniss ( talk) 10:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Updated template with details from Anandtech article. It is now also used by at least one article. -- Denniss ( talk) 09:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 02:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC). reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 30. plicit 23:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC) reply

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Manchester Metrolink Frietjes ( talk) 17:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Now in use, but feel free to renominate if you still think it should be deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Appears to be article content, but it is not used in any articles. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 16:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Nonsense DR, it will be added to articles once final specifications are out in 1-2 weeks, will be similar to use of the previous template -- Denniss ( talk) 18:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Denniss is right, it is not like everything gets perfect in the first revision. Erkin Alp Güney 11:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Hence my opinion is, oppose. Erkin Alp Güney 21:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 09:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Many details will (hopefully) be released today so then we'll be able to update it and transclude to article. -- Denniss ( talk) 10:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC) reply
Updated template with details from Anandtech article. It is now also used by at least one article. -- Denniss ( talk) 09:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC) reply

No transclusions. — hueman1 ( talk contributions) 02:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC). reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook