The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Was used in one article and currently used in one sandbox. I've replaced the article usage with Template:Weather box/colp as the /doc says this is the standard color style. Both templates together have 2 transclusions so having alternative styles for this is a complete overkill. The sandbox version should also be replaced and this deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 12:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused other than in the docs. Gonnym ( talk) 12:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Was used in 1 template and 1 article which I've replaced with Template:Weather box/colt as the /doc says this is the standard color style. No reason to have an alternative style that is barely used. Gonnym ( talk) 12:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused other than in docs and 1 archived talk page. Gonnym ( talk) 12:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Used in 2 user sandboxes and 1 talk page from ~2008. Subst there and delete as this is no longer used with this its parent template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Used in only 1 sandbox from 2009. Subst there and delete. Gonnym ( talk) 12:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Used in only 1 old talk page. Subst there and delete. Gonnym ( talk) 12:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Was used in a single article where I subst it. No longer has any usages. Gonnym ( talk) 12:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
no need for a current squad template as team is defunct Joeykai ( talk) 13:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
no need for a current squad template as team is defunct Joeykai ( talk) 13:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete/keep. Delete "formerly" due to the ambiguous name and keep "thread retitled" (nothing to merge). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Formerly with
Template:Thread retitled.
All the 11 transclusions of Formerly are a misuse of the template when it was supposed to be used for "former title of a thread". —
DaxServer (
t ·
m ·
c)
16:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as a duplicate of Template:Fake heading Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
This set of templates goes completely against the MoS. If a header should be used then the it should use the proper syntax. These templates also do not work with new software features like the subscribe option. Usages should be replaced with the relevant header syntax and the templates deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 20:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused and also seems pretty pointless. The only reason to use a horizontal rule is for its visual element. If a line break is wanted, then there are other, semantically correct ways to produce it. Gonnym ( talk) 20:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Was used in one article and currently used in one sandbox. I've replaced the article usage with Template:Weather box/colp as the /doc says this is the standard color style. Both templates together have 2 transclusions so having alternative styles for this is a complete overkill. The sandbox version should also be replaced and this deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 12:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused other than in the docs. Gonnym ( talk) 12:26, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Was used in 1 template and 1 article which I've replaced with Template:Weather box/colt as the /doc says this is the standard color style. No reason to have an alternative style that is barely used. Gonnym ( talk) 12:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused other than in docs and 1 archived talk page. Gonnym ( talk) 12:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Used in 2 user sandboxes and 1 talk page from ~2008. Subst there and delete as this is no longer used with this its parent template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused weather box sub template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Used in only 1 sandbox from 2009. Subst there and delete. Gonnym ( talk) 12:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Used in only 1 old talk page. Subst there and delete. Gonnym ( talk) 12:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Was used in a single article where I subst it. No longer has any usages. Gonnym ( talk) 12:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
no need for a current squad template as team is defunct Joeykai ( talk) 13:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
no need for a current squad template as team is defunct Joeykai ( talk) 13:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete/keep. Delete "formerly" due to the ambiguous name and keep "thread retitled" (nothing to merge). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Formerly with
Template:Thread retitled.
All the 11 transclusions of Formerly are a misuse of the template when it was supposed to be used for "former title of a thread". —
DaxServer (
t ·
m ·
c)
16:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as a duplicate of Template:Fake heading Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
This set of templates goes completely against the MoS. If a header should be used then the it should use the proper syntax. These templates also do not work with new software features like the subscribe option. Usages should be replaced with the relevant header syntax and the templates deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 20:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused and also seems pretty pointless. The only reason to use a horizontal rule is for its visual element. If a line break is wanted, then there are other, semantically correct ways to produce it. Gonnym ( talk) 20:10, 20 March 2022 (UTC)