The result of the discussion was delete. One thing is clear: this template is virtually unusable in the current state, and has to go. Whether a new genera-only template can be created later or readers should be made to rely on taxoboxes has no consensus but a new rescoped template can be created at any time. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 17:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Huge navbox that is way too large to provide any useful navigation. WP:NAVBOXCREEP and WP:NENAN. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants/Archive74#Oversized_navigation_template. Mbdfar ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rescope into just genera or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy per creator request. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
No transclusions, incoming links, or categories. Created in March 2022, but does not appear to have been adopted anywhere. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 21:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, three of the articles on it are at prod Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 24. ✗ plicit 23:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 04:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Only four links (both Giant Days links go to the same page). WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete for linking to virtually no articles. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Club has been relegated out of the Scottish Professional Football League, and now doesn't have any players who have articles. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 18:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Similar to the Sri Lanka templates that were deleted on April 12 I nominated. Don't see the need for navboxes for every certain period in Thailand's history. All of these are primarily just clutter for listing every leader and institution that relates to the specific period. But these fall under template creep when there are other templates covering the scope for all the articles under the events section in all three navboxes. Template:History of Thailand navbox can probably cover the scope. But these navbox is broader for its subject matter. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
17:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unhelpful. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Used only once in one article as a note for a citation. Unclear what "not available everywhere" means, but this seems to be similar to the |url-access=
parameter in the citation templates. If that is the case, replace with standard parameter and delete tempate.
Gonnym (
talk)
17:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
No one is creating subpages in this way anymore. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The template has been completed its historical mission and should be deleted. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7 (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 18:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The template is not used by the way. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
meant for use with Show previewin their edit summary of creation. I'll let them comment further. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Eventually, the template was no longer used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
At present, this template is no longer used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
This template is not currently used by any page. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The status quo is that this template is no longer used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
This template isn't even being used at the moment. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
This BS template is not used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 15:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The template are empty and currently completely unused. Q 𝟤 𝟪 15:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
All links were deleted in a May 24, 2017 Afd. No need to keep anymore. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Propose to delete this unused template that attempts to use an extension that isn't present on English Wikipedia. — andrybak ( talk) 09:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. One thing is clear: this template is virtually unusable in the current state, and has to go. Whether a new genera-only template can be created later or readers should be made to rely on taxoboxes has no consensus but a new rescoped template can be created at any time. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 17:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Huge navbox that is way too large to provide any useful navigation. WP:NAVBOXCREEP and WP:NENAN. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants/Archive74#Oversized_navigation_template. Mbdfar ( talk) 19:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rescope into just genera or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
22:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was userfy per creator request. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
No transclusions, incoming links, or categories. Created in March 2022, but does not appear to have been adopted anywhere. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 21:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, three of the articles on it are at prod Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 24. ✗ plicit 23:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Izno ( talk) 04:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Only four links (both Giant Days links go to the same page). WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete for linking to virtually no articles. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Club has been relegated out of the Scottish Professional Football League, and now doesn't have any players who have articles. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 18:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Similar to the Sri Lanka templates that were deleted on April 12 I nominated. Don't see the need for navboxes for every certain period in Thailand's history. All of these are primarily just clutter for listing every leader and institution that relates to the specific period. But these fall under template creep when there are other templates covering the scope for all the articles under the events section in all three navboxes. Template:History of Thailand navbox can probably cover the scope. But these navbox is broader for its subject matter. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk)
17:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete as unhelpful. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 22:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Used only once in one article as a note for a citation. Unclear what "not available everywhere" means, but this seems to be similar to the |url-access=
parameter in the citation templates. If that is the case, replace with standard parameter and delete tempate.
Gonnym (
talk)
17:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
No one is creating subpages in this way anymore. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The template has been completed its historical mission and should be deleted. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7 (non-admin closure) Frietjes ( talk) 18:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The template is not used by the way. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
meant for use with Show previewin their edit summary of creation. I'll let them comment further. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Eventually, the template was no longer used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
At present, this template is no longer used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
This template is not currently used by any page. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The status quo is that this template is no longer used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
This template isn't even being used at the moment. Q 𝟤 𝟪 16:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
This BS template is not used. Q 𝟤 𝟪 15:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The template are empty and currently completely unused. Q 𝟤 𝟪 15:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
All links were deleted in a May 24, 2017 Afd. No need to keep anymore. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Propose to delete this unused template that attempts to use an extension that isn't present on English Wikipedia. — andrybak ( talk) 09:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)