The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Article content on template space. No need for substitution anywhere. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Due to the template creator announcing their intent to use these templates on multiple pages soon.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 23:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Article content on template space. Montana's at-large congressional district doesn't need this. Nor anywhere could this be substituted on. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
as and when required. There have been no changes in Delaware & Montana's delegation yet. Why would anyone want to edit the template, unless they still believes strongly in 2020 election conspiracies? Well, now, look at Template:Current U.S. representatives from California (11 of 13 edits are other accounts & IPs). Similarly Template:Current U.S. representatives from New York, Template:Current U.S. representatives from Texas, Template:Current U.S. representatives from Nebraska. These states had a change in delegation, because of vacancies and subsequent special election and hence were edited
as and when requiredby other accounts and IPs. The barrier, or so you claim, is just a very visible "edit" link on the top of table, that has had no visible problem for IPs. As for usage of the template, I've already committed to use them efficiently across articles that share the same template. Give some time man. There are 50 states, and I have a non-WP life too. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 04:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Templates should not normally be used to store article text(emphasis added) all the times it approaches anything close to that meaning. Tables aren't text. The information page the blue linked "article text" takes us to doesn't mention anything about tables either. Further, I did say that these are supposed to have 3 transclusions when I reach there. I don't understand what's so difficult for you to understand. As for the current number of transclusions these templates, I already said I need time. Contrary to popular beliefs, I'm not a bot, neither do I know how to build one. When you have to compete with some 3 million students for a few tens of thousands of seats at affordable government colleges, right after you spent entire 23 months at home (not school) because of lockdown, you'd know my burden but you wouldn't. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 20:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Template creator announced a plan to include the template in more articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 19:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a template that adds simple styles and which can trivially be replaced with those styles directly. It has no business existing accordingly.
Its use also encourages adding styles, when we just simply should not in most cases. And lastly, the codes are absolutely opaque. Izno ( talk) 17:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Stuttgart Stadtbahn Frietjes ( talk) 15:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. Without an explanation for why this is needed, it does not appear to be usable. I have never seen a MOS section that advises the use of "double strikethrough" formatting. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused after Template:Speciesbox/name was converted to Lua here. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Double strikethrough/backend with
Module:Dssplit.
Template:Double strikethrough/backend is only used by the module. In general, if there already is a module, then the entire code should be there and not split between module and templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nom wants to merge, one other wants to rename, and two others want to delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 08:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Article content on template space. No need for substitution anywhere. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Due to the template creator announcing their intent to use these templates on multiple pages soon.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 23:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 22:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Article content on template space. Montana's at-large congressional district doesn't need this. Nor anywhere could this be substituted on. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
as and when required. There have been no changes in Delaware & Montana's delegation yet. Why would anyone want to edit the template, unless they still believes strongly in 2020 election conspiracies? Well, now, look at Template:Current U.S. representatives from California (11 of 13 edits are other accounts & IPs). Similarly Template:Current U.S. representatives from New York, Template:Current U.S. representatives from Texas, Template:Current U.S. representatives from Nebraska. These states had a change in delegation, because of vacancies and subsequent special election and hence were edited
as and when requiredby other accounts and IPs. The barrier, or so you claim, is just a very visible "edit" link on the top of table, that has had no visible problem for IPs. As for usage of the template, I've already committed to use them efficiently across articles that share the same template. Give some time man. There are 50 states, and I have a non-WP life too. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 04:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Templates should not normally be used to store article text(emphasis added) all the times it approaches anything close to that meaning. Tables aren't text. The information page the blue linked "article text" takes us to doesn't mention anything about tables either. Further, I did say that these are supposed to have 3 transclusions when I reach there. I don't understand what's so difficult for you to understand. As for the current number of transclusions these templates, I already said I need time. Contrary to popular beliefs, I'm not a bot, neither do I know how to build one. When you have to compete with some 3 million students for a few tens of thousands of seats at affordable government colleges, right after you spent entire 23 months at home (not school) because of lockdown, you'd know my burden but you wouldn't. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 20:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Template creator announced a plan to include the template in more articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 19:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a template that adds simple styles and which can trivially be replaced with those styles directly. It has no business existing accordingly.
Its use also encourages adding styles, when we just simply should not in most cases. And lastly, the codes are absolutely opaque. Izno ( talk) 17:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Stuttgart Stadtbahn Frietjes ( talk) 15:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. Without an explanation for why this is needed, it does not appear to be usable. I have never seen a MOS section that advises the use of "double strikethrough" formatting. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Unused after Template:Speciesbox/name was converted to Lua here. Gonnym ( talk) 08:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Double strikethrough/backend with
Module:Dssplit.
Template:Double strikethrough/backend is only used by the module. In general, if there already is a module, then the entire code should be there and not split between module and templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nom wants to merge, one other wants to rename, and two others want to delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 08:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)