The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Feel free to enact the alternative renaming solution Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:OTRS topicon with
Template:VRT topicon.
This one should be named {{
VRT topicon}} as it is the primary one.
Jonatan Svensson Glad (
talk) 21:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 23:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 23:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to have been used since 2014 * Pppery * it has begun... 16:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 04:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused and redundant with noting but mainly red links. And created by sockpuppet. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 04:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused and filled with red links. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not comply with WP:NAVBOX guidelines, which suggest that "the subject of the template should be mentioned in every article", "The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent," and "If not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles." This collection of apocrypha (TLBotBatFBoE for short) is one of many, many published collections of apocrypha (if each collection had their own navbox, we'd have 10 similar navboxes at the bottom of a lot of articles). TLBotBatFBoE was merely reusing centuries old translations, was written millennia after these works were originally published, and is a rather eclectic set of works that would not easily be linked by a "See also" section (the letters of Ignatius are authentic letters by a 2nd century Christian; the Letter of Aristeas is a 2nd or 3rd century BCE Jewish work; the Gospel of Nicodemus is a medieval pseudepigraphic work; these aren't closely linked, and they're written over a millennium apart). The articles (correctly) don't generally mention their inclusion in this collection. It might be worth making an exception if TLBotBatFBoE was truly epicly popular, the authoritative 20th & 21st century source on these works, but a check of Amazon review count shows this collection with fewer reviews & ratings than other, more modern apocrypha collections. Anyway, apocrypha navboxes are fine, but the linked articles are already connected by {{ Jewish Apocrypha}}, {{ New Testament Apocrypha}}, and so on. This template is generally redundant to them with the exception of a few articles - and those articles (e.g. Odes of Solomon) should probably be included in a different navbox anyway with more directly related works. SnowFire ( talk) 04:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused rail template after the style was merged into the module. Gonnym ( talk) 15:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
unused Frietjes ( talk) 19:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Guangzhou Metro. Frietjes ( talk) 19:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 23:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused language expansion header. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused chart template. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 23:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused Germany district image maps. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused military rank template. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused message template. Not substituted anywhere if that was the intent. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused medal icon templates. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 8. ✗ plicit 23:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Can be replaced by the standard {{ Compact ToC}} (see List of Xbox One games (A–L) as an example). Izno ( talk) 23:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | April Fools isn't here yet, or has passed! Please do not start pranking until April 1 (UTC time). If it is April 1 (UTC), then please
purge the page and this notice will disappear and you can enjoy April 1. Please do not remove this notice, even on April Fools. The beginning of April Fools Day 2022 has started. ( refresh) |
The result of the discussion was April Fools' always. Until it's over (like now) (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
April Fools today, April Fools tomorrow, April Fools forever B2TF ( talk) 05:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Citation added. April fools' is over. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Per WP:Citation needed. 4-1 citation needed Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 04:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Hahaha. April fools' is over. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
This template claims that the material tagged with it is not meant to be taken seriously. However, material tagged with this template is actually the only material on the entire site that is meant to be taken seriously. This needs to be fixed! - Preceding signed comment added by Evil Sith Lord ( talk • contribs) 07:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Feel free to enact the alternative renaming solution Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:OTRS topicon with
Template:VRT topicon.
This one should be named {{
VRT topicon}} as it is the primary one.
Jonatan Svensson Glad (
talk) 21:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Izno (
talk) 23:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 23:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to have been used since 2014 * Pppery * it has begun... 16:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 04:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused and redundant with noting but mainly red links. And created by sockpuppet. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 04:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused and filled with red links. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not comply with WP:NAVBOX guidelines, which suggest that "the subject of the template should be mentioned in every article", "The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent," and "If not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles." This collection of apocrypha (TLBotBatFBoE for short) is one of many, many published collections of apocrypha (if each collection had their own navbox, we'd have 10 similar navboxes at the bottom of a lot of articles). TLBotBatFBoE was merely reusing centuries old translations, was written millennia after these works were originally published, and is a rather eclectic set of works that would not easily be linked by a "See also" section (the letters of Ignatius are authentic letters by a 2nd century Christian; the Letter of Aristeas is a 2nd or 3rd century BCE Jewish work; the Gospel of Nicodemus is a medieval pseudepigraphic work; these aren't closely linked, and they're written over a millennium apart). The articles (correctly) don't generally mention their inclusion in this collection. It might be worth making an exception if TLBotBatFBoE was truly epicly popular, the authoritative 20th & 21st century source on these works, but a check of Amazon review count shows this collection with fewer reviews & ratings than other, more modern apocrypha collections. Anyway, apocrypha navboxes are fine, but the linked articles are already connected by {{ Jewish Apocrypha}}, {{ New Testament Apocrypha}}, and so on. This template is generally redundant to them with the exception of a few articles - and those articles (e.g. Odes of Solomon) should probably be included in a different navbox anyway with more directly related works. SnowFire ( talk) 04:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused rail template after the style was merged into the module. Gonnym ( talk) 15:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
unused Frietjes ( talk) 19:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Guangzhou Metro. Frietjes ( talk) 19:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 23:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused language expansion header. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused chart template. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 23:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused Germany district image maps. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused military rank template. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 20:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused message template. Not substituted anywhere if that was the intent. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 21:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused medal icon templates. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 8. ✗ plicit 23:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Can be replaced by the standard {{ Compact ToC}} (see List of Xbox One games (A–L) as an example). Izno ( talk) 23:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | April Fools isn't here yet, or has passed! Please do not start pranking until April 1 (UTC time). If it is April 1 (UTC), then please
purge the page and this notice will disappear and you can enjoy April 1. Please do not remove this notice, even on April Fools. The beginning of April Fools Day 2022 has started. ( refresh) |
The result of the discussion was April Fools' always. Until it's over (like now) (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
April Fools today, April Fools tomorrow, April Fools forever B2TF ( talk) 05:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Citation added. April fools' is over. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Per WP:Citation needed. 4-1 citation needed Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 04:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Hahaha. April fools' is over. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
This template claims that the material tagged with it is not meant to be taken seriously. However, material tagged with this template is actually the only material on the entire site that is meant to be taken seriously. This needs to be fixed! - Preceding signed comment added by Evil Sith Lord ( talk • contribs) 07:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)