- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:28, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Pandora Papers ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unnecessary navbox, linking only Pandora Papers and List of people named in the Pandora Papers. There is a WikiQuote page, but no WikiCommons page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 02:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
03:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Still support deletion, as most of the newly-added articles only mention the Pandora Papers in passing or not at all, which makess the articles too loosely affiliated to support a navbox. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I have updated template. This is important due to its topic. I will update it with more headings.11:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Ameen Akbar ( talk)
- Keep per @Ameen Akbar. ytpks896 ( talk) 13:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I'd advise adding the template to the relevant articles before going to a Tfd to see if its use is warranted. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 13:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Pppery. This topic does not presently meet the expectations in WP:NAVBOX, particularly #3 and #5, and I do not anticipate that fact will change. Probably {{ Panama Papers}} and {{ Paradise Papers}} should meet the same fate as this template. There probably is a reasonable combined template for the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists that should exist connecting all the papers related topics and any other significant activities of the ICIJ, or maybe a generic {{ Papers leaks}} or something. -- Izno ( talk) 15:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above; does not meet guidelines number 3 and 5 in WP:NAVBOX. The linked articles do not refer to each other, because the Pandora Papers are the only thing they have in common, and they would be unlikely to appear in each other's "See also" sections if not for this navbox. I would also agree on combining all the ICIJ paper leaks into one navbox. Yeeno ( talk) 🍁 00:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - All so to save face about the current leak warranting it. - 2603:9000:A703:1EFD:9541:8330:E94D:87FB ( talk) 02:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Not based on the recent news but because it looks like the template has been improved. It looks like the template was copy and pasted from
{{ Panama Papers}}, so even if it was deleted today I would imagine a navbox would be created eventually. – The Grid ( talk) 12:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 19. Izno ( talk) 18:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Alhatorah ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Module:Alhatorah ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Remove unranked ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single-purpose template to remove one string ("unranked_"), now replaced with a generic find-replace template. User:GKFX talk 21:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:28, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Pandora Papers ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unnecessary navbox, linking only Pandora Papers and List of people named in the Pandora Papers. There is a WikiQuote page, but no WikiCommons page. – Muboshgu ( talk) 02:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
03:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Still support deletion, as most of the newly-added articles only mention the Pandora Papers in passing or not at all, which makess the articles too loosely affiliated to support a navbox. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I have updated template. This is important due to its topic. I will update it with more headings.11:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Ameen Akbar ( talk)
- Keep per @Ameen Akbar. ytpks896 ( talk) 13:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I'd advise adding the template to the relevant articles before going to a Tfd to see if its use is warranted. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 13:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Pppery. This topic does not presently meet the expectations in WP:NAVBOX, particularly #3 and #5, and I do not anticipate that fact will change. Probably {{ Panama Papers}} and {{ Paradise Papers}} should meet the same fate as this template. There probably is a reasonable combined template for the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists that should exist connecting all the papers related topics and any other significant activities of the ICIJ, or maybe a generic {{ Papers leaks}} or something. -- Izno ( talk) 15:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above; does not meet guidelines number 3 and 5 in WP:NAVBOX. The linked articles do not refer to each other, because the Pandora Papers are the only thing they have in common, and they would be unlikely to appear in each other's "See also" sections if not for this navbox. I would also agree on combining all the ICIJ paper leaks into one navbox. Yeeno ( talk) 🍁 00:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - All so to save face about the current leak warranting it. - 2603:9000:A703:1EFD:9541:8330:E94D:87FB ( talk) 02:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Not based on the recent news but because it looks like the template has been improved. It looks like the template was copy and pasted from
{{ Panama Papers}}, so even if it was deleted today I would imagine a navbox would be created eventually. – The Grid ( talk) 12:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 19. Izno ( talk) 18:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Alhatorah ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Module:Alhatorah ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Remove unranked ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Single-purpose template to remove one string ("unranked_"), now replaced with a generic find-replace template. User:GKFX talk 21:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).