The result of the discussion was see week earlier TFD. Izno ( talk) 02:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a routine nomination of all pages in Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates for deletion. This category is a temporary holding area for taxonomy templates whose deletion will be uncontroversial, because the template is both unused and unnecessary, e.g. because it is incorrectly set up, or relates to a taxon no longer used. Periodically, all templates in this category will be nominated for deletion. These are templates used by the Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system; they are never placed directly on articles. The templates nominated here have all been blanked and are no longer in use. For more details, see this talk page thread at Wikipedia talk:Automated taxobox system. Credit for this explanation goes to Jonesey95 and Plantdrew, as I drew it up by combing their comments from a prior nomination. Tamwin ( talk) 21:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Extremely pointless template, which adds "the ". Such things do not need templates. Subst to where its used. Gonnym ( talk) 18:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
These templates are broken, with the links leading to the main yahoo.com page. Gonnym ( talk) 16:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
The whole family of TV.com templates was deleted at this discussion for the reasons that the site is no longer considered a good external link and better alternatives exist. Gonnym ( talk) 16:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was do not merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:POV with
Template:Unbalanced.
I propsed this merge six months ago, as "These seem to be about the same issue."
; the closing summary was "...keep separate. The majority of opponents to the proposal feel that any shortcomings and "duplicity" [sic] between the two templates can be cleared up by expanding and/or clarifying the documentation to make it more clear when to use each template. If there are still concerns about usage following these updates/changes, there is no prejudice against re-nomination, but please give a few months for both the changes to be made and to potentially demonstrate that there has been an impact."
. Since then, the documentation of neither template has changed.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
14:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
"POV would be the wrong template"So you prefer a template which, according to its own documentation, is for "when you have identified a serious issue of balance and the lack of a WP:Neutral point of view"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after converting any salvageable links to non-templated links Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Template that has ceased to function because the links have died. It currently outputs nothing outside of preview. Used on ~60 pages. If necessary, could be replaced with a normal external link in the future, if there were such available. Izno ( talk) 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Template that has ceased to function because the links have died. It currently outputs nothing outside of preview. Rarely used. If necessary, could be replaced with a normal external link in the future, if there were such available. Izno ( talk) 13:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
per WP:NENAN. Apart from the head article, there are only three other specifically relevant navigational links. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 12:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was see week earlier TFD. Izno ( talk) 02:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a routine nomination of all pages in Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates for deletion. This category is a temporary holding area for taxonomy templates whose deletion will be uncontroversial, because the template is both unused and unnecessary, e.g. because it is incorrectly set up, or relates to a taxon no longer used. Periodically, all templates in this category will be nominated for deletion. These are templates used by the Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system; they are never placed directly on articles. The templates nominated here have all been blanked and are no longer in use. For more details, see this talk page thread at Wikipedia talk:Automated taxobox system. Credit for this explanation goes to Jonesey95 and Plantdrew, as I drew it up by combing their comments from a prior nomination. Tamwin ( talk) 21:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Extremely pointless template, which adds "the ". Such things do not need templates. Subst to where its used. Gonnym ( talk) 18:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
These templates are broken, with the links leading to the main yahoo.com page. Gonnym ( talk) 16:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
The whole family of TV.com templates was deleted at this discussion for the reasons that the site is no longer considered a good external link and better alternatives exist. Gonnym ( talk) 16:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was do not merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:POV with
Template:Unbalanced.
I propsed this merge six months ago, as "These seem to be about the same issue."
; the closing summary was "...keep separate. The majority of opponents to the proposal feel that any shortcomings and "duplicity" [sic] between the two templates can be cleared up by expanding and/or clarifying the documentation to make it more clear when to use each template. If there are still concerns about usage following these updates/changes, there is no prejudice against re-nomination, but please give a few months for both the changes to be made and to potentially demonstrate that there has been an impact."
. Since then, the documentation of neither template has changed.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
14:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
"POV would be the wrong template"So you prefer a template which, according to its own documentation, is for "when you have identified a serious issue of balance and the lack of a WP:Neutral point of view"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after converting any salvageable links to non-templated links Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Template that has ceased to function because the links have died. It currently outputs nothing outside of preview. Used on ~60 pages. If necessary, could be replaced with a normal external link in the future, if there were such available. Izno ( talk) 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Template that has ceased to function because the links have died. It currently outputs nothing outside of preview. Rarely used. If necessary, could be replaced with a normal external link in the future, if there were such available. Izno ( talk) 13:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
per WP:NENAN. Apart from the head article, there are only three other specifically relevant navigational links. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 12:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)