The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
For most usage (anything except antimatter, judging by the documentation) this template is redundant to {{
chem2}}, as with the
other single-element templates discussed previously. Anti-matter cannot be written with the normal chemistry templates. Instead the template that
Template:Element wraps can be used ({{Physics particle|He|TR=+|anti=yes}}
→
He+
) which is equally straightforward. Fairly low usage.
User:GKFX
talk
23:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Just two winners. The Banner talk 18:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, just two links to winners The Banner talk 18:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, of course, since it was meant as a temporary-use template while previewing. No incoming links from discussion pages. This template was created back when references did not show at all when previewing a section. MediaWiki has been changed to show refs when previewing a section, so this template is no longer useful. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions. Appears to have been created as an experiment in 2018, but unless it has been substed, it has had no use. Delete, or if it is used, change to subst only by adding {{ subst only}} to its documentation. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn ( non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions. Created in 2014; no substantive edits since that time. If I had to guess, I would guess that there are no official US Highways in Puerto Rico, only Category:Highways in Puerto Rico that have other designations, so it is not possible to use this template. The same rationale and potential explanation applies to {{ Gu browse}} (Guam) and {{ Vi browse}} (US Virgin Islands?). If they can be used, please put them into use and I will happily withdraw this nomination. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links. Appears to have been copied from German WP in 2017 for use in translation of portal pages, but unless it has been substed, it has had no use. Delete, or if it is used, change to subst only by adding {{ subst only}} to its documentation. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions. Appears to have been used as a subtemplate of Template:IPA-pl at one time (as of 2009), but subsequent development of that template appears to have orphaned this one. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions of this navbox. Only one link in this navbox. See similar nomination that closed as Delete. Linking of possibly relevant articles is well covered by Category:People Power (Hong Kong) politicians, which has only 11 members. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links. No substantive edits since creation in 2008. May be redundant to {{ Fhps}} or another template in Category:Field hockey templates. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused; no transclusions, substitutions, or incoming links. No substantive edits since 2013. Appears to be a template that was created in anticipation of use, but was never used. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Only 1 link, which is already in the article. Superfluous. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
unused. Guys, it looks like we should delete it. Q28 ( talk) 07:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this template is no longer used. Q28 ( talk) 07:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Okay, but it's really not used. Q28 ( talk) 07:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Not used and very rough. Q28 ( talk) 07:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The template is corrupted and unused. Q28 ( talk) 07:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
It is not used and no longer in use. Q28 ( talk) 07:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 ( talk) 06:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 ( talk) 06:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 ( talk) 06:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Obviously, we might want to delete it. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Is not being used, so we need to delete it. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Is not used, and the template document does not say that the template needs to be preserved. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. The page appears to be in use, it has been fully-protected and had its content model corrected. Speedy keep reason 3: nomination entirely inaccurate, although some work was needed. (non-admin closure) User:GKFX talk 10:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused pages, and It is completely corrupted. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
completely corrupted, and that latter claim merely indicates that the nominator is on the wrong side of Chesterton's fence. This does need to be fully protected (which is a better solution that the ugly hack of moving to userspace) to remedy GFKX's concern, but after changing the content model to JavaScript, there will be no valid reason for deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
For most usage (anything except antimatter, judging by the documentation) this template is redundant to {{
chem2}}, as with the
other single-element templates discussed previously. Anti-matter cannot be written with the normal chemistry templates. Instead the template that
Template:Element wraps can be used ({{Physics particle|He|TR=+|anti=yes}}
→
He+
) which is equally straightforward. Fairly low usage.
User:GKFX
talk
23:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:NENAN. Just two winners. The Banner talk 18:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, just two links to winners The Banner talk 18:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, of course, since it was meant as a temporary-use template while previewing. No incoming links from discussion pages. This template was created back when references did not show at all when previewing a section. MediaWiki has been changed to show refs when previewing a section, so this template is no longer useful. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions. Appears to have been created as an experiment in 2018, but unless it has been substed, it has had no use. Delete, or if it is used, change to subst only by adding {{ subst only}} to its documentation. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn ( non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 23:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions. Created in 2014; no substantive edits since that time. If I had to guess, I would guess that there are no official US Highways in Puerto Rico, only Category:Highways in Puerto Rico that have other designations, so it is not possible to use this template. The same rationale and potential explanation applies to {{ Gu browse}} (Guam) and {{ Vi browse}} (US Virgin Islands?). If they can be used, please put them into use and I will happily withdraw this nomination. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links. Appears to have been copied from German WP in 2017 for use in translation of portal pages, but unless it has been substed, it has had no use. Delete, or if it is used, change to subst only by adding {{ subst only}} to its documentation. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions. Appears to have been used as a subtemplate of Template:IPA-pl at one time (as of 2009), but subsequent development of that template appears to have orphaned this one. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions of this navbox. Only one link in this navbox. See similar nomination that closed as Delete. Linking of possibly relevant articles is well covered by Category:People Power (Hong Kong) politicians, which has only 11 members. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
No transclusions, no incoming links. No substantive edits since creation in 2008. May be redundant to {{ Fhps}} or another template in Category:Field hockey templates. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused; no transclusions, substitutions, or incoming links. No substantive edits since 2013. Appears to be a template that was created in anticipation of use, but was never used. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 00:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Only 1 link, which is already in the article. Superfluous. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
unused. Guys, it looks like we should delete it. Q28 ( talk) 07:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this template is no longer used. Q28 ( talk) 07:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Okay, but it's really not used. Q28 ( talk) 07:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Not used and very rough. Q28 ( talk) 07:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 11:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The template is corrupted and unused. Q28 ( talk) 07:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
It is not used and no longer in use. Q28 ( talk) 07:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 ( talk) 06:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 ( talk) 06:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 07:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Guys, this is an unused template. Q28 ( talk) 06:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 03:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused. Obviously, we might want to delete it. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Is not being used, so we need to delete it. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Is not used, and the template document does not say that the template needs to be preserved. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. The page appears to be in use, it has been fully-protected and had its content model corrected. Speedy keep reason 3: nomination entirely inaccurate, although some work was needed. (non-admin closure) User:GKFX talk 10:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused pages, and It is completely corrupted. Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 01:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
completely corrupted, and that latter claim merely indicates that the nominator is on the wrong side of Chesterton's fence. This does need to be fully protected (which is a better solution that the ugly hack of moving to userspace) to remedy GFKX's concern, but after changing the content model to JavaScript, there will be no valid reason for deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)