The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 22:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article Frietjes ( talk) 22:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 3. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 22:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox station. There were several editors who opposed the merger and raised concerns that this merger would not be an improvement and pointed out a few possible issues, however significantly more editors believed a merger would be appropriate. I suggest that whoever implements this merger make sure editors working on UK railways articles and the people who raised concerns here are part of the process and specific concerns are addressed as far as possible. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 14:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Previous TfDs for this template: |
Propose merging the listed UK-specific templates with
Template:Infobox station.
These templates' params can be almost perfectly matched by {{
Infobox station}} (and then some). I've done this with
Newcastle railway station at my sandbox:
Special:Permalink/968998076. Pretty much all the params converted bar a couple:
I removed a couple as duplicates (eg location and place). This is with no edits to {{ Infobox station}} by the way, not using a sandbox version. Obviously with some tidying up we can make the passengers not show "Passengers" for each row, and add those two params. The other 2 templates are even less different than {{ Infobox GB station}}. Given the various new params in {{ Infobox station}}, I think it's a good candidate for merge. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 19:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The nominator is encouraged, at least, to create a mock up version of the merged template before renominating these templates. Not to repeat my nom, I've done that using the existing live {{ Infobox station}} (at Special:Permalink/968998076) with an existing live railway station to show the data can be converted over (with the exception of two params which I propose adding as useful generic ones). My PoC was done using solely the existing parameters in the template. With a full overlap in params (bar gridref, which we can add), and an even more basic structure for the latter two templates, I can't see why all these shouldn't be merged. Perhaps there have been changes to {{ Infobox station}} since 2012 to make it more compatible, I haven't checked its history. There is nothing complex about an A->B param map.
{{
Infobox London station}}
not been included in the bundle? There is much more in common between that and {{
Infobox GB station}}
than between the latter and {{
Infobox station}}
, and there are occasions when the GB one is replaced by the London one (
example), but I know of no situation where it was necessary to replace any of the GB ones with the generic one.The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
unused wrapper template -- AquaDTRS ( talk) 16:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Template has no purpose. Appears to be an experiment, like this new editor's other contributions. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicates templates in Category:Twitter user templates. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicates existing templates, e.g. {{ in use}} or {{ cleanup}}. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:16, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicates TFD process templates. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
{{
delete|No use for Wikipedia}}
until I just removed it. The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a useful template. It looks like an experiment. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a useful template. It looks like an experiment. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a useful template. It looks like an experiment. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 15:20, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes ( talk) 15:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 21:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused as the now-cancelled multi-sport event for disabled athletes because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. ApprenticeFan work 14:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 15:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Local project consensus is for team templates just for World Cup and continental championships (Euro 2020, AFCON etc), not for the Nations League. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Template:England squad UEFA Nations League Finals 2019 Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 15:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
WikipediaData
tool in
Mathematica 12I chose to format this analysis as numbered bullet points.
Conclusion: This template is not useful.
I'd recommend discussing points 4–6 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:16, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 15:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary template based upon machinima company Edgeworks Entertainment. There aren't any articles on The Codex Series, while Vox Populi is a redirect to Edgeworks Entertainment#Vox Populi. Edgeworks is not mentioned in Halo 2, it is mentioned once in machinima and not in new media. There's only full-fledged article on founder Alexander Winn, but that's it. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 22:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article Frietjes ( talk) 22:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 3. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 22:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox station. There were several editors who opposed the merger and raised concerns that this merger would not be an improvement and pointed out a few possible issues, however significantly more editors believed a merger would be appropriate. I suggest that whoever implements this merger make sure editors working on UK railways articles and the people who raised concerns here are part of the process and specific concerns are addressed as far as possible. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears ( talk) 14:03, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Previous TfDs for this template: |
Propose merging the listed UK-specific templates with
Template:Infobox station.
These templates' params can be almost perfectly matched by {{
Infobox station}} (and then some). I've done this with
Newcastle railway station at my sandbox:
Special:Permalink/968998076. Pretty much all the params converted bar a couple:
I removed a couple as duplicates (eg location and place). This is with no edits to {{ Infobox station}} by the way, not using a sandbox version. Obviously with some tidying up we can make the passengers not show "Passengers" for each row, and add those two params. The other 2 templates are even less different than {{ Infobox GB station}}. Given the various new params in {{ Infobox station}}, I think it's a good candidate for merge. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 19:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The nominator is encouraged, at least, to create a mock up version of the merged template before renominating these templates. Not to repeat my nom, I've done that using the existing live {{ Infobox station}} (at Special:Permalink/968998076) with an existing live railway station to show the data can be converted over (with the exception of two params which I propose adding as useful generic ones). My PoC was done using solely the existing parameters in the template. With a full overlap in params (bar gridref, which we can add), and an even more basic structure for the latter two templates, I can't see why all these shouldn't be merged. Perhaps there have been changes to {{ Infobox station}} since 2012 to make it more compatible, I haven't checked its history. There is nothing complex about an A->B param map.
{{
Infobox London station}}
not been included in the bundle? There is much more in common between that and {{
Infobox GB station}}
than between the latter and {{
Infobox station}}
, and there are occasions when the GB one is replaced by the London one (
example), but I know of no situation where it was necessary to replace any of the GB ones with the generic one.The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
unused wrapper template -- AquaDTRS ( talk) 16:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Template has no purpose. Appears to be an experiment, like this new editor's other contributions. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicates templates in Category:Twitter user templates. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicates existing templates, e.g. {{ in use}} or {{ cleanup}}. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:16, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Duplicates TFD process templates. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
{{
delete|No use for Wikipedia}}
until I just removed it. The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a useful template. It looks like an experiment. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a useful template. It looks like an experiment. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G5 by Cryptic ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a useful template. It looks like an experiment. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 15:20, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes ( talk) 15:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert ( talk) 21:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused as the now-cancelled multi-sport event for disabled athletes because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. ApprenticeFan work 14:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 15:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Local project consensus is for team templates just for World Cup and continental championships (Euro 2020, AFCON etc), not for the Nations League. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Template:England squad UEFA Nations League Finals 2019 Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 15:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
WikipediaData
tool in
Mathematica 12I chose to format this analysis as numbered bullet points.
Conclusion: This template is not useful.
I'd recommend discussing points 4–6 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:16, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 15:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary template based upon machinima company Edgeworks Entertainment. There aren't any articles on The Codex Series, while Vox Populi is a redirect to Edgeworks Entertainment#Vox Populi. Edgeworks is not mentioned in Halo 2, it is mentioned once in machinima and not in new media. There's only full-fledged article on founder Alexander Winn, but that's it. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)