The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 7. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 11:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused fork of Template:Nuremberg S-Bahn. AlgaeGraphix ( talk) 19:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 7. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 11:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Disruptive template by a disruptive editor. Kinu t/ c 09:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Personal templates like this should not be here at all. FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 09:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was wrong venue. This should be at MediaWiki talk:Nocreatetext (presumably to make it the same as Mediawiki:Noarticletext-nopermission) since it is not acting like a template (no transclusions, just a standard interface message). — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Propose merging
MediaWiki:Nocreatetext with
Template:No article text.
I ran into the
MediaWiki:Nocreatetext notice when testing out the create page input box from
H:YFA while logged out. It appears to be a less well-developed duplicate of
Template:No article text (which is transcluded at
MediaWiki:Noarticletext). The stated distinction at
Template talk:No article text is that one is used when trying to view a non-existent page whereas the other is used when trying to edit a non-existent page, but there seems to be nothing tailored in the notices themselves, and I'm not sure what distinction we would want to make. Could we merge them to the design at
Template:No article text? {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
00:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 7. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 11:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused fork of Template:Nuremberg S-Bahn. AlgaeGraphix ( talk) 19:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 7. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 11:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Disruptive template by a disruptive editor. Kinu t/ c 09:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Personal templates like this should not be here at all. FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 09:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was wrong venue. This should be at MediaWiki talk:Nocreatetext (presumably to make it the same as Mediawiki:Noarticletext-nopermission) since it is not acting like a template (no transclusions, just a standard interface message). — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Propose merging
MediaWiki:Nocreatetext with
Template:No article text.
I ran into the
MediaWiki:Nocreatetext notice when testing out the create page input box from
H:YFA while logged out. It appears to be a less well-developed duplicate of
Template:No article text (which is transcluded at
MediaWiki:Noarticletext). The stated distinction at
Template talk:No article text is that one is used when trying to view a non-existent page whereas the other is used when trying to edit a non-existent page, but there seems to be nothing tailored in the notices themselves, and I'm not sure what distinction we would want to make. Could we merge them to the design at
Template:No article text? {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
00:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)