The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Pursuant to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 May 28 and because there was a previous discussion cut short by a speedy deletion (due to sockpuppetry). I have no opinion myself, but pinging MarnetteD as the previous discussion participants. Note that I restored the template to a pre-IP sock version when removing the {{ tempundelete}} Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{ infobox settlement}}. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Region-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
77.11.73.22 ( talk) 17:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
|NUTS=
area for the EU, they will have to guess which "blank" parameter contains the value they need to change. Personally I would like to see that all the specific fields are dealt with, by being handled in the {{
Infobox settlement}} template, before this is converted. Once the specific fields are dealt with, I see no issue with this being substituted.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷
talk to me |
my contributions
20:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
|GDP=
and |NUTS=
in {{
Infobox settlement}} before substitution.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷
talk to me |
my contributions
22:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
No transclusions. Duplicates basic module functionality. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 09:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
This infobox template is not used anywhere because I put it directly into the article. It exists in only one article and is not reusable anywhere else. Article content should not exist in template space. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 09:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused more than two years after its creation. Undocumented, so it's not possible to determine if it duplicates functionality in other templates that start with "Bluebook", of which there are at least seven. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 08:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused, and unlikely to be used in an article. Still mostly red links after seven years. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 08:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused template that's been superseded by a full graphics library for the various motorways. Imzadi 1979 → 03:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 11. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Pursuant to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 May 28 and because there was a previous discussion cut short by a speedy deletion (due to sockpuppetry). I have no opinion myself, but pinging MarnetteD as the previous discussion participants. Note that I restored the template to a pre-IP sock version when removing the {{ tempundelete}} Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{ infobox settlement}}. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Region-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
77.11.73.22 ( talk) 17:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
|NUTS=
area for the EU, they will have to guess which "blank" parameter contains the value they need to change. Personally I would like to see that all the specific fields are dealt with, by being handled in the {{
Infobox settlement}} template, before this is converted. Once the specific fields are dealt with, I see no issue with this being substituted.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷
talk to me |
my contributions
20:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
|GDP=
and |NUTS=
in {{
Infobox settlement}} before substitution.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷
talk to me |
my contributions
22:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
No transclusions. Duplicates basic module functionality. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 09:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
This infobox template is not used anywhere because I put it directly into the article. It exists in only one article and is not reusable anywhere else. Article content should not exist in template space. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 09:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused more than two years after its creation. Undocumented, so it's not possible to determine if it duplicates functionality in other templates that start with "Bluebook", of which there are at least seven. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 08:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused, and unlikely to be used in an article. Still mostly red links after seven years. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 08:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Unused template that's been superseded by a full graphics library for the various motorways. Imzadi 1979 → 03:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 11. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)