The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 08:04, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
These templates are only used in Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers and offer links to sub-categories by nationality, but since no one is keeping them updated, they do not list all the country categories. This is a wasted effort, which requires active maintenance, while all of them can be easily replaced by a see also link in the article leading directly to the parent category, which is always up-to-date. Also, since they are not placed on any other relevant page, they offer no navigation per WP:LINKBACK. Gonnym ( talk) 21:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
The navbox violates WP:FILMNAV, "Filmographies (and similar) of individuals should also not be included in navboxes, unless the individual concerned could be considered a primary creator of the material in question." As simply a producer, Scott Rudin is almost never the primary creator of the material in question. Furthermore, producer navboxes in general are inappropriate because per WP:NAVBOX disadvantages, they "may also incorrectly suggest that one aspect of a topic or a linked example is of more, less, or equal importance to others" and "can take up too much space for information that is only tangentially related" and "may not give the reader enough clues as to which links are most relevant". Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 20:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
The navbox violates WP:FILMNAV, "Filmographies (and similar) of individuals should also not be included in navboxes, unless the individual concerned could be considered a primary creator of the material in question." As simply a producer, David Heyman is almost never the primary creator of the material in question. Furthermore, producer navboxes in general are inappropriate because per WP:NAVBOX disadvantages, they "may also incorrectly suggest that one aspect of a topic or a linked example is of more, less, or equal importance to others" and "can take up too much space for information that is only tangentially related" and "may not give the reader enough clues as to which links are most relevant". Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 19:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:22, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete Google just shut down Google+, and the external link no longer works. Only 166 remaining transclusions. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Head article plus three other pages doesn't even meet the bare minimum of
WP:NENAN. (The "Discography" link just redirects back to the main article).
Note: I nominated this after being pinged to the discusison at
WT:WikiProject Music#Template:Angaleena_Presley.
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs) 17:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete all templates. TfD is not the forum for deleting a category, and since there is another template in the category that is not part of this TfD, it is not eligible for deletion under WP:C1. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
merged with article with attribution per this discussion. Frietjes ( talk) 16:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
S-line templates for Hudson-Bergen Light Rail. Merged into Module:Adjacent stations/NJ Transit. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 10:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/DC Streetcar. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. If Biden doesn't run for election in 2020, there is no prejudice against renomination. Primefac ( talk) 19:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
An unnecessary template that lacks substantial information and clutters the page instead. Walk Like an Egyptian ( talk) 00:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC); edited 23:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Cleanup image and convert into a wrapper. This will mean no change necessary to Twinkle while still collecting duplicate templates into a smaller space. Primefac ( talk) 00:47, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Cleanup-SVG with
Template:Cleanup image.
Unused currently, and this template could easily be merged back into the other image cleanup template, by making that template accept a parameter as to the media-type.
ShakespeareFan00 (
talk) 08:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
Cleanup image|type=SVG|1={{{1|}}}}}
. --
Ahecht (
TALKThe result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 20. Primefac ( talk) 00:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies with the caveat that the requester actually improve/utilize the template per the concerns raised in the discussion. Primefac ( talk) 00:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox. About half redlinks and no parent article. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by Fastily ( log entry) (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 04:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
No reason to warn a user about this problem; it automatically corrects itself as the templates substitute to a transclusion of themselves. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 22:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
An important part of Wikipedia historyis not a reason to keep a template. -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 15:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Bengali cuisine. During the merge, remove redlinks and only keep dishes that are "specific to Bengal" and not general desserts found in the subcontinent. Primefac ( talk) 00:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article. Mostly redlinks Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{ Infobox settlement}}. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 20:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
As anyone following TFDs know, there has been a LOT of contention about {{ Infobox settlement}} wrappers. I want to discuss this one in particular with no prejudice towards the other wrappers...
{{ Metadata South Africa}} upon which this template is largely based is already in the process of being deleted per this tfd. Additionally, {{ Inofbox South African town}} has already been deleted per this tfd. I feel that these show a clear precedent for up-merging this specific infobox.
To be clear, NO INFORMATION will be deleted from the articles. Once the merge is done, from the reader's perspective, nothing will have changed. Any questions or concerns, please {{ping|zackmann08}}
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 16:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 08:04, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
These templates are only used in Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers and offer links to sub-categories by nationality, but since no one is keeping them updated, they do not list all the country categories. This is a wasted effort, which requires active maintenance, while all of them can be easily replaced by a see also link in the article leading directly to the parent category, which is always up-to-date. Also, since they are not placed on any other relevant page, they offer no navigation per WP:LINKBACK. Gonnym ( talk) 21:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
The navbox violates WP:FILMNAV, "Filmographies (and similar) of individuals should also not be included in navboxes, unless the individual concerned could be considered a primary creator of the material in question." As simply a producer, Scott Rudin is almost never the primary creator of the material in question. Furthermore, producer navboxes in general are inappropriate because per WP:NAVBOX disadvantages, they "may also incorrectly suggest that one aspect of a topic or a linked example is of more, less, or equal importance to others" and "can take up too much space for information that is only tangentially related" and "may not give the reader enough clues as to which links are most relevant". Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 20:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
The navbox violates WP:FILMNAV, "Filmographies (and similar) of individuals should also not be included in navboxes, unless the individual concerned could be considered a primary creator of the material in question." As simply a producer, David Heyman is almost never the primary creator of the material in question. Furthermore, producer navboxes in general are inappropriate because per WP:NAVBOX disadvantages, they "may also incorrectly suggest that one aspect of a topic or a linked example is of more, less, or equal importance to others" and "can take up too much space for information that is only tangentially related" and "may not give the reader enough clues as to which links are most relevant". Erik ( talk | contrib) ( ping me) 19:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:22, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Delete Google just shut down Google+, and the external link no longer works. Only 166 remaining transclusions. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Head article plus three other pages doesn't even meet the bare minimum of
WP:NENAN. (The "Discography" link just redirects back to the main article).
Note: I nominated this after being pinged to the discusison at
WT:WikiProject Music#Template:Angaleena_Presley.
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs) 17:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete all templates. TfD is not the forum for deleting a category, and since there is another template in the category that is not part of this TfD, it is not eligible for deletion under WP:C1. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
merged with article with attribution per this discussion. Frietjes ( talk) 16:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
S-line templates for Hudson-Bergen Light Rail. Merged into Module:Adjacent stations/NJ Transit. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 10:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 00:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/DC Streetcar. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus. If Biden doesn't run for election in 2020, there is no prejudice against renomination. Primefac ( talk) 19:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
An unnecessary template that lacks substantial information and clutters the page instead. Walk Like an Egyptian ( talk) 00:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC); edited 23:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Cleanup image and convert into a wrapper. This will mean no change necessary to Twinkle while still collecting duplicate templates into a smaller space. Primefac ( talk) 00:47, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Cleanup-SVG with
Template:Cleanup image.
Unused currently, and this template could easily be merged back into the other image cleanup template, by making that template accept a parameter as to the media-type.
ShakespeareFan00 (
talk) 08:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
Cleanup image|type=SVG|1={{{1|}}}}}
. --
Ahecht (
TALKThe result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 20. Primefac ( talk) 00:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies with the caveat that the requester actually improve/utilize the template per the concerns raised in the discussion. Primefac ( talk) 00:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox. About half redlinks and no parent article. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by Fastily ( log entry) (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 04:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
No reason to warn a user about this problem; it automatically corrects itself as the templates substitute to a transclusion of themselves. {{3x|p}}ery ( talk) 22:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
An important part of Wikipedia historyis not a reason to keep a template. -- Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 15:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Bengali cuisine. During the merge, remove redlinks and only keep dishes that are "specific to Bengal" and not general desserts found in the subcontinent. Primefac ( talk) 00:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
unused navbox with no parent article. Mostly redlinks Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{ Infobox settlement}}. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 20:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
As anyone following TFDs know, there has been a LOT of contention about {{ Infobox settlement}} wrappers. I want to discuss this one in particular with no prejudice towards the other wrappers...
{{ Metadata South Africa}} upon which this template is largely based is already in the process of being deleted per this tfd. Additionally, {{ Inofbox South African town}} has already been deleted per this tfd. I feel that these show a clear precedent for up-merging this specific infobox.
To be clear, NO INFORMATION will be deleted from the articles. Once the merge is done, from the reader's perspective, nothing will have changed. Any questions or concerns, please {{ping|zackmann08}}
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 16:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)