The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG converse 08:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Module no longer used in its associated template Template:Further per this; for some reason I didn't think to simply do that when I merged Module:Details in a few months back.. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 17:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delayed Conditional Deletion. In the event that no source on the topic is located, that verifies the content of the template, within a span of six months, the template can be deleted. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG converse 08:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2015 Magioladitis ( talk) 09:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
{{
unreferenced section}}
be placed? Second have you removed any other such request for citation tags from family templates? --
PBS (
talk)
13:22, 27 July 2018 (UTC){{
unreferenced section}}
to {{
refimprove section}}
which is a lot of extra unnecessary work. Hence it makes much more sense to place a request for citations into the template itself. Trees are an optional extra. The reason why they are collapsed is a compromise between those who like them and those who would prefer if Wikipeida did not include them in articles. Placing the request for citation into the template has three advantages. (1) it can display on any page that it appears. (2) It acts as a heads-up to readers that the tree is not sourced and so may contain original research or errors (for editors potential violations of two of the core content policies
WP:NOR and
WP:V). (3) As the templates is collapsed if a reader/editor does not open the collapsed box to view the tree they do not need to see the heads-up which when the box is collapsed is visually obtrusive as it is larger than the collapsed box -- this is something I considered when I placed them inside the collapsed box as I could have placed it above the collapse box to appear in all the articles even if the box was collapsed. --
PBS (
talk)
08:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)|reason=
because at least I got confused and what exactly needs citation. Certain names? The entire tree? Maybe use {{
citation needed}} in the places the reference is required? --
Magioladitis (
talk)
14:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 7. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG converse 08:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG converse 08:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Module no longer used in its associated template Template:Further per this; for some reason I didn't think to simply do that when I merged Module:Details in a few months back.. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 17:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delayed Conditional Deletion. In the event that no source on the topic is located, that verifies the content of the template, within a span of six months, the template can be deleted. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG converse 08:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2015 Magioladitis ( talk) 09:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
{{
unreferenced section}}
be placed? Second have you removed any other such request for citation tags from family templates? --
PBS (
talk)
13:22, 27 July 2018 (UTC){{
unreferenced section}}
to {{
refimprove section}}
which is a lot of extra unnecessary work. Hence it makes much more sense to place a request for citations into the template itself. Trees are an optional extra. The reason why they are collapsed is a compromise between those who like them and those who would prefer if Wikipeida did not include them in articles. Placing the request for citation into the template has three advantages. (1) it can display on any page that it appears. (2) It acts as a heads-up to readers that the tree is not sourced and so may contain original research or errors (for editors potential violations of two of the core content policies
WP:NOR and
WP:V). (3) As the templates is collapsed if a reader/editor does not open the collapsed box to view the tree they do not need to see the heads-up which when the box is collapsed is visually obtrusive as it is larger than the collapsed box -- this is something I considered when I placed them inside the collapsed box as I could have placed it above the collapse box to appear in all the articles even if the box was collapsed. --
PBS (
talk)
08:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)|reason=
because at least I got confused and what exactly needs citation. Certain names? The entire tree? Maybe use {{
citation needed}} in the places the reference is required? --
Magioladitis (
talk)
14:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 7. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG converse 08:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)