From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn, wrong venue. ( non-admin closure) ToThAc ( talk) 22:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Classical Chinese is a written language. The high form of Sinitic languages. It is based on the long-dead colloquial language of Zhou Dynasty. There is no living native oral speakers of this language. Minimizing Studio ( talk) 21:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RickinBaltimore ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply

redundant to {{ TSSN|name=I}} and problematic naming due to confusion with {{ it}}. Frietjes ( talk) 20:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 May 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn, wrong venue. ( non-admin closure) ToThAc ( talk) 22:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Classical Chinese is a written language. The high form of Sinitic languages. It is based on the long-dead colloquial language of Zhou Dynasty. There is no living native oral speakers of this language. Minimizing Studio ( talk) 21:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RickinBaltimore ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 15:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply

redundant to {{ TSSN|name=I}} and problematic naming due to confusion with {{ it}}. Frietjes ( talk) 20:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 May 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook