- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was "question answered" (NAC) Frietjes ( talk) 13:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, I know this isn't the place to ask this, but I can't think of anyplace else. Something weird is going on with the template Template:Beggars Banquet tracks. It was tagged with T3 for speedy deletion on May 6. Somehow that has resulted in all the individual song article pages getting listed at Category:Speedy deletion candidates with talk pages, even though the articles themselves are not candidates for deletion. The same is the case with Template:Sticky Fingers tracks, Template:Let It Bleed tracks, and Template:Exile on Main St. tracks. I have no idea how to fix this. Or will it fix itself when the templates are deleted? Anyone know? (Anyone? Buehler? Anyone?) -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
MelanieN, you should wrap the speedy deletion tags in
<noinclude>...</noinclude>if you don't want them to be transcluded with the template. also, you should (1) orphan the template before (2) having it deleted. otherwise we are going to have redlinks to a non-existing template in a bunch of articles. Frietjes ( talk) 13:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Inactive team. Can be substituted and deleted. ~ Rob13 Talk 12:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- substitute/delete per nom, only used in one article. Frietjes ( talk) 13:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox99speedmart ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No real purpose of the template. Also a template loop. QianCheng 虔诚 05:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was "question answered" (NAC) Frietjes ( talk) 13:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, I know this isn't the place to ask this, but I can't think of anyplace else. Something weird is going on with the template Template:Beggars Banquet tracks. It was tagged with T3 for speedy deletion on May 6. Somehow that has resulted in all the individual song article pages getting listed at Category:Speedy deletion candidates with talk pages, even though the articles themselves are not candidates for deletion. The same is the case with Template:Sticky Fingers tracks, Template:Let It Bleed tracks, and Template:Exile on Main St. tracks. I have no idea how to fix this. Or will it fix itself when the templates are deleted? Anyone know? (Anyone? Buehler? Anyone?) -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
-
MelanieN, you should wrap the speedy deletion tags in
<noinclude>...</noinclude>if you don't want them to be transcluded with the template. also, you should (1) orphan the template before (2) having it deleted. otherwise we are going to have redlinks to a non-existing template in a bunch of articles. Frietjes ( talk) 13:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Inactive team. Can be substituted and deleted. ~ Rob13 Talk 12:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- substitute/delete per nom, only used in one article. Frietjes ( talk) 13:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox99speedmart ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No real purpose of the template. Also a template loop. QianCheng 虔诚 05:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).