From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

This template provides links to the now-defunct College Football Data Warehouse. All links are now dead. Jweiss11 ( talk) 20:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Plastikspork:, when SporkBot removes templates like these, what would happen in the case of Robert B. Redman? The template in question here generates the only external link in the external links section of the article. Would SporkBot remove the section heading as well or leave an empty section? Jweiss11 ( talk) 21:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Jweiss11, by default, the bot would leave the empty section. However, it is possible to have the empty section removed as well, it just takes more programming. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Plastikspork, it would be great if the empty sections could be removed as well. Thanks, Jweiss11 ( talk) 21:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, though once a useful site for citation, with the site gone, this template is no longer useful.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

unused and not needed Frietjes ( talk) 18:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

This is a navigational template for a music artist consists of a bunch of redlink, too few articles to justify a navbox. Mjbmr ( talk) 17:27, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Created out of process in 2006, never used, not needed; no corresponding category exists. Her Pegship ( talk) 17:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

I updated Miner's Cup to use {{ sports rivalry series table}}, so this is no longer needed Frietjes ( talk) 16:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Bourgoin rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Provence rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Tarbes rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Birmingham Moseley rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the London Welsh rugby union team, which folded in December 2016, and released all their players. This template is no longer transcluded from any articles, and no longer valid. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

An awkward sorting template that links to a number of redirects (stations without articles). Removing the redundant redirect links would probably leave not enough articles to link. Raymie ( tc) 08:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

This template provides links to the now-defunct College Football Data Warehouse. All links are now dead. Jweiss11 ( talk) 20:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Plastikspork:, when SporkBot removes templates like these, what would happen in the case of Robert B. Redman? The template in question here generates the only external link in the external links section of the article. Would SporkBot remove the section heading as well or leave an empty section? Jweiss11 ( talk) 21:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Jweiss11, by default, the bot would leave the empty section. However, it is possible to have the empty section removed as well, it just takes more programming. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Plastikspork, it would be great if the empty sections could be removed as well. Thanks, Jweiss11 ( talk) 21:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, though once a useful site for citation, with the site gone, this template is no longer useful.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

unused and not needed Frietjes ( talk) 18:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

This is a navigational template for a music artist consists of a bunch of redlink, too few articles to justify a navbox. Mjbmr ( talk) 17:27, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Created out of process in 2006, never used, not needed; no corresponding category exists. Her Pegship ( talk) 17:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

I updated Miner's Cup to use {{ sports rivalry series table}}, so this is no longer needed Frietjes ( talk) 16:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Bourgoin rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Provence rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Tarbes rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Birmingham Moseley rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the London Welsh rugby union team, which folded in December 2016, and released all their players. This template is no longer transcluded from any articles, and no longer valid. TheMightyPeanut ( talk) 15:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

An awkward sorting template that links to a number of redirects (stations without articles). Removing the redundant redirect links would probably leave not enough articles to link. Raymie ( tc) 08:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook