- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- delete, thankfully unused. we don't need standings templates for high school football. Frietjes ( talk) 13:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Torku Konyaspor roster ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Türk Telekom BK roster ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused and out-of-date Frietjes ( talk) 16:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
unused and duplicates Best Balıkesir B.K.#Current roster Frietjes ( talk) 16:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox map ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
since the last discussion, this template has been replace by (1) introducing a second parameter in the infoboxes for file/image-based maps, (2) replacing the infobox map call with calls to {{ location map}} and InfoboxImage, (3) replacing any x/y dot maps with other maps (mostly location maps). the last discussion closed as "no consensus" mostly because this refactoring/replacement was happening during the discussion. but, now that the refactoring/replacement is complete, this template can be safely deleted. Frietjes ( talk) 14:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- @ Jc86035, Hike395, Jonesey95, and JohnBlackburne: who participated in the last discussion. Frietjes ( talk) 14:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support, but we'll need to be careful to check and fix incoming links, like the one at
Template:Infobox mountain range/doc. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
14:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- fixed.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I do not see any more incoming links that would be confusing to editors. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- fixed.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- support Seems all the refactoring/replacement that needs doing has been done. Links are not a problem, anyone following a redlink should see the reason it was deleted and can if they want investigate further based on that. Apart from subpages of this template the only transclusion now is a user’s test page that they can take care of if they wish to. Nothing else needs doing before deleting it.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 15:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 31. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was resolved Frietjes ( talk) 14:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
There is something wrong with Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality when using the Photomontage with the image_skyline, check this article for instance Khabarovsk compared to Trujillo, Peru when using Template:Infobox settlement. Amorite Mercenary ( talk) 09:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Amorite Mercenary, it seems like you aren't proposing anything for deletion or merger in this discussion? I fixed the problem in Khabarovsk, so can we close this thread? normally, we discuss particular problems with Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality at Template talk:Infobox Russian inhabited locality and not at TFD. Frietjes ( talk) 14:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
@ Frietjes: you can close this thread, for sure ! Amorite Mercenary ( talk) 14:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- delete, thankfully unused. we don't need standings templates for high school football. Frietjes ( talk) 13:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Torku Konyaspor roster ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Türk Telekom BK roster ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused and out-of-date Frietjes ( talk) 16:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
unused and duplicates Best Balıkesir B.K.#Current roster Frietjes ( talk) 16:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox map ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
since the last discussion, this template has been replace by (1) introducing a second parameter in the infoboxes for file/image-based maps, (2) replacing the infobox map call with calls to {{ location map}} and InfoboxImage, (3) replacing any x/y dot maps with other maps (mostly location maps). the last discussion closed as "no consensus" mostly because this refactoring/replacement was happening during the discussion. but, now that the refactoring/replacement is complete, this template can be safely deleted. Frietjes ( talk) 14:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- @ Jc86035, Hike395, Jonesey95, and JohnBlackburne: who participated in the last discussion. Frietjes ( talk) 14:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support, but we'll need to be careful to check and fix incoming links, like the one at
Template:Infobox mountain range/doc. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
14:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- fixed.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I do not see any more incoming links that would be confusing to editors. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- fixed.
Frietjes (
talk)
14:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- support Seems all the refactoring/replacement that needs doing has been done. Links are not a problem, anyone following a redlink should see the reason it was deleted and can if they want investigate further based on that. Apart from subpages of this template the only transclusion now is a user’s test page that they can take care of if they wish to. Nothing else needs doing before deleting it.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 15:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 31. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was resolved Frietjes ( talk) 14:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
There is something wrong with Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality when using the Photomontage with the image_skyline, check this article for instance Khabarovsk compared to Trujillo, Peru when using Template:Infobox settlement. Amorite Mercenary ( talk) 09:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- Amorite Mercenary, it seems like you aren't proposing anything for deletion or merger in this discussion? I fixed the problem in Khabarovsk, so can we close this thread? normally, we discuss particular problems with Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality at Template talk:Infobox Russian inhabited locality and not at TFD. Frietjes ( talk) 14:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
@ Frietjes: you can close this thread, for sure ! Amorite Mercenary ( talk) 14:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).