From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 16

Template:H-1 aux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 24 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lifeform-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. We have well-established stub category trees such as Category:Eukaryote stubs to handle lifeforms. Until we make first contact, this is unnecessary. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Directeurs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

redundant to navigation provided by Template:French Directory. if we really need the per-date-span chronology, we can add a "date span" option to Template:French Directory to toggle showing the particular "date span". Frietjes ( talk) 14:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Baerum Basket depth chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and out-of-date Frietjes ( talk) 13:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Badmintonbox5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

unused Frietjes ( talk) 13:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ba Football squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and out-of-date Frietjes ( talk) 13:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Keep, i will use it here Ba_F.C. and also update it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishfiji ( talkcontribs) 06:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply
    @ Krishfiji: why would you do that when you can just update Ba F.C.#Current squad? there is no reason to have it in a separate template if you are just using it in one article. Frietjes ( talk) 15:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Even if it is used, it would only be used in one article, so might as well be maintained on that article instead of in a template. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cambrian nav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused and redundant to the graphically superior {{ Cambrian graphical timeline}}. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

This template is for categories, not articles, so there is no redundancy. Abyssal ( talk) 12:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
It'll be used. Abyssal ( talk) 19:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: It's in use now. Abyssal ( talk) 17:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Yeah, but not usefully, in my opinion. It's being used to navigate to the categories that are already plainly linked on the page as subcategories. Where's the navigational benefit to that? ~ Rob13 Talk 06:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Californication

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. Just a link to Californication, a character, and a bunch of links to the list of episodes article. Better handled by normal wikilinks. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • delete, mostly redirects. Frietjes ( talk) 13:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I'm the author. All links were to articles at the time. I have removed [1] the entries which were deleted or redirected to List of Californication episodes. This should be done even if it's kept but it does leave a rather small navbox. PrimeHunter ( talk) 13:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused Mid-American Conference standings templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • delete, or move to userspace until the articles can be written. Frietjes ( talk) 13:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-jazz-composition-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13 Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. Please check template history before nomination! Grutness... wha? 11:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship ( talk) 18:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-erotic-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-child-sf-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-Marathi-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-jazz-composition-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13 Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. See above. Grutness... wha? 11:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship ( talk) 18:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-horror-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-Marathi-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-philos-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-jazz-composition-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13 Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. Again, see above. Grutness... wha? 11:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship ( talk) 18:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-bildungsroman-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-Marathi-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-thriller-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-horror-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-erotic-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-child-hist-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1900s-mystery-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1900s-Germany-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1890s-child-hist-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1880s-mystery-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 16

Template:H-1 aux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 24 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lifeform-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. We have well-established stub category trees such as Category:Eukaryote stubs to handle lifeforms. Until we make first contact, this is unnecessary. ~ Rob13 Talk 19:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Directeurs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

redundant to navigation provided by Template:French Directory. if we really need the per-date-span chronology, we can add a "date span" option to Template:French Directory to toggle showing the particular "date span". Frietjes ( talk) 14:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Baerum Basket depth chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and out-of-date Frietjes ( talk) 13:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Badmintonbox5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

unused Frietjes ( talk) 13:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ba Football squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

unused and out-of-date Frietjes ( talk) 13:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Keep, i will use it here Ba_F.C. and also update it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishfiji ( talkcontribs) 06:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply
    @ Krishfiji: why would you do that when you can just update Ba F.C.#Current squad? there is no reason to have it in a separate template if you are just using it in one article. Frietjes ( talk) 15:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Even if it is used, it would only be used in one article, so might as well be maintained on that article instead of in a template. ~ Rob13 Talk 06:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cambrian nav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused and redundant to the graphically superior {{ Cambrian graphical timeline}}. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

This template is for categories, not articles, so there is no redundancy. Abyssal ( talk) 12:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
It'll be used. Abyssal ( talk) 19:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: It's in use now. Abyssal ( talk) 17:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Yeah, but not usefully, in my opinion. It's being used to navigate to the categories that are already plainly linked on the page as subcategories. Where's the navigational benefit to that? ~ Rob13 Talk 06:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Californication

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. Just a link to Californication, a character, and a bunch of links to the list of episodes article. Better handled by normal wikilinks. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • delete, mostly redirects. Frietjes ( talk) 13:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I'm the author. All links were to articles at the time. I have removed [1] the entries which were deleted or redirected to List of Californication episodes. This should be done even if it's kept but it does leave a rather small navbox. PrimeHunter ( talk) 13:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused Mid-American Conference standings templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • delete, or move to userspace until the articles can be written. Frietjes ( talk) 13:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-jazz-composition-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13 Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. Please check template history before nomination! Grutness... wha? 11:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship ( talk) 18:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-erotic-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-child-sf-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-Marathi-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-jazz-composition-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13 Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. See above. Grutness... wha? 11:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship ( talk) 18:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-horror-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-Marathi-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-philos-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-jazz-composition-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13 Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Unused. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. Again, see above. Grutness... wha? 11:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship ( talk) 18:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-bildungsroman-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-Marathi-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-thriller-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-horror-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-erotic-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-child-hist-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1900s-mystery-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1900s-Germany-film-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1890s-child-hist-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1880s-mystery-novel-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13 Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook